Short Communications
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2011.760

NEW FOOD FRAUDS IN SEAFOOD CHAIN: TUB GURNARD OR PANGASIUS?

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 3 January 2013
Published: 1 April 2011
1267
Views
1495
Downloads
fraud, species identification, fish, isoelectrofocusing

Authors

M. C. Campagna
lucia.zoppi@pagepress.org
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana – Roma, Italy.
S. Marozzi
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana – Roma, Italy.
R. Condoleo
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana – Roma, Italy.
N. Bottalico
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana – Roma, Italy.
A. Nardoni
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana – Roma, Italy.
R. Cavallina
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana – Roma, Italy.
The present study reports a case of food fraud occurred in the Lazio region. Using the Isoelectrofocusing we revealed the substitution of tub-gurnard, with the less valuable commercial fish, pangasius.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite



1.
NEW FOOD FRAUDS IN SEAFOOD CHAIN: TUB GURNARD OR PANGASIUS? Ital J Food Safety [Internet]. 2011 Apr. 1 [cited 2026 Sep. 17];1(1):95-6. Available from: https://www.pagepressjournals.org/ijfs/article/view/ijfs.2011.1.95

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.