Original Articles
AIVI - September 2009 - Issue 5
https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2009.1146

AUTHENTICATION OF WILD AND REARED SEA BASS BY INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY NIRs (NEAR INFRARED REFLECTANCE SPECTROSCOPY)

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 13 February 2013
Published: 13 September 2009
1531
Views
1048
Downloads
NIRs, Authentication, Farmed, Wild, sea bass, fatty acids

Authors

E. Novelli
lucia.zoppi@pagepress.org
Dipartimento di Sanità pubblica, Patologia comparata e Igiene veterinaria, Italy.
S. Balzan
Dipartimento di Sanità pubblica, Patologia comparata e Igiene veterinaria, Italy.
S. Tenti
Dipartimento di Scienze animali – Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy.
M. Mirisola
Dipartimento di Scienze animali – Università degli Studi di Padova, .
F. Benozzo
Dipartimento di Scienze animali – Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy.
S. Santomauro
Dipartimento di Sanità pubblica, Patologia comparata e Igiene veterinaria, Italy.
L. Fasolato
Dipartimento di Sanità pubblica, Patologia comparata e Igiene veterinaria, Italy.
The aim of this study was to evaluate NIRs (Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy) performances in the prediction of Farmed vs.Wild production method in European sea bass. Samples collected (n=39) were submitted to analysis in order to assess chemical composition and fatty acids profile of fillets. Aliquots of wet and ground freeze-dried minced samples were scanned in duplicates (1100 to 2498 nm; 2 nm intervals) in reflectance mode using a monochromator NIRsystem 5000. NIRs technique showed a satisfactory accurateness in predicting Protein, Lipids and Fatty acids profile in raw samples. Sample lyophilisation increased some predicting values (r2: coefficient of determination on cross-validation range from 0,671 to 0,992; SECV: standard error of cross-validation range from 0,864 to 2,981). Results showed that NIRs technique was able to discriminate between Wild (94,7% samples recognized) and Farmed (100% samples recognized) using wet muscles, and 100% for both classes on ground freeze-dried fillet.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite



1.
AUTHENTICATION OF WILD AND REARED SEA BASS BY INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY NIRs (NEAR INFRARED REFLECTANCE SPECTROSCOPY). Ital J Food Safety [Internet]. 2009 Sep. 13 [cited 2026 Apr. 17];1(5):69-73. Available from: https://www.pagepressjournals.org/ijfs/article/view/ijfs.2009.5.69

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.