Conference Paper
Vol. 15 No. s1 (2026): XXXV National Conference of the Italian Association of Veterinary Food...
https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2026.16257
PO29 | MICROBIOLOGICAL SAFETY OF DRY-AGED EYE OF ROUND BEEF TREATED WITH BEEF TALLOW COATING
Elena Zanato1, Giulia Polizzi1, Laura Prandini1, Federica Savini1, Alessandro Seguino1, Alessandra De Cesare1, Lia Bardasi2, Silvia Vianello2, Mattia Ramini2, Andrea Serraino1 | 1Dip. di Scienze Mediche Veterinarie, Università di Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia (BO), Italy; 2Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna, Bologna, Italy.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 2 September 2026
Published: 2 September 2026
Published: 2 September 2026
4
Views
0
Downloads
Methods. Three batches of eye of round were sliced and divided into control and L. monocytogenes-inoculated samples. The latter were inoculated at day 0 with a cocktail of three L. monocytogenes strains and, together with the control samples, dry-aged for 45 days in a dedicated dry-aging chamber (Stagionello® Meat Curing Device) under controlled conditions (1 ± 2 °C, 78 ± 7% relative humidity, and 2.0 m/s airflow speed). Samples were collected at 0, 15, 30, and 45 days, while beef tallow coating was applied to both groups after 15 days of aging. Control samples were analysed for total bacterial count (TBC), lactic acid bacteria (LAB), and Enterobacteriaceae, while L. monocytogenes was enumerated in inoculated samples according to the relevant ISO standards (ISO 4833-2:2013, ISO 15214:1998, ISO 21528-2:2017, and ISO 11290-2:2017). pH was measured using a penetration pH meter according to ISO 2917:1999, whereas aw was determined on crust samples using an Aqualab 4TE hygrometer according to ISO 18787:2017.
Results. A progressive reduction in microbial populations was observed throughout the dry-aging period. TBC decreased from 5.83 ± 0.34 Log CFU/g at day 0 to 3.62 ± 0.36 Log CFU/g after 45 days. Enterobacteriaceae showed a marked reduction of 1.95 Log units over the 45-day aging period, with the greatest decline occurring during the first 15 days of aging. Similarly, LAB decreased from 4.96 ± 0.34 to 3.09 ± 0.39 Log CFU/g by day 45.
In inoculated samples, L. monocytogenes counts declined from 4.32 ± 0.01 Log CFU/g after inoculation to 2.78 ± 0.39 Log CFU/g at the end of the aging period, corresponding to a reduction of approximately 1.5 Log units.
aw decreased steadily during dry aging, from 0.997 ± 0.001 at day 0 to 0.735 ± 0.014 at day 45, whereas pH remained substantially unchanged, ranging from 5.52 ± 0.06 to 5.56 ± 0.07. The progressive reduction in aw was accompanied by a decrease in bacterial populations, indicating an association between reduced water activity and microbial decline during dry aging.
Conclusions. Dry aging under the applied processing conditions resulted in a progressive reduction of microbial populations, including L. monocytogenes, in compliance with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1141. Beef tallow coating was successfully applied as part of the commercial dry-aging process without compromising microbiological safety.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
1.
PO29 | MICROBIOLOGICAL SAFETY OF DRY-AGED EYE OF ROUND BEEF TREATED WITH BEEF TALLOW COATING: Elena Zanato1, Giulia Polizzi1, Laura Prandini1, Federica Savini1, Alessandro Seguino1, Alessandra De Cesare1, Lia Bardasi2, Silvia Vianello2, Mattia Ramini2, Andrea Serraino1 | 1Dip. di Scienze Mediche Veterinarie, Università di Bologna, Ozzano dell’Emilia (BO), Italy; 2Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia Romagna, Bologna, Italy. Ital J Food Safety [Internet]. 2026 Sep. 2 [cited 2026 Sep. 10];15(s1). Available from: https://www.pagepressjournals.org/ijfs/article/view/16257
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s)


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.