Original Articles

The Bayesian β-binomial model to improve the inference based on the results of sampling plans: the case study of the biotoxin monitoring plan of Chamelea gallina natural beds

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 15 October 2025
Published: 3 February 2026
147
Views
128
Downloads

Authors

Sampling is a cornerstone of food safety monitoring, yet traditional frequentist approaches can yield unreliable inferences in the presence of rare or absent events, particularly when maximum likelihood estimates lie on the boundary of the parameter space and asymptotic approximations are not justified due to insufficient event counts. This study introduces the Bayesian β-binomial model as an effective framework to improve statistical inference in sampling plans, integrating prior knowledge with observed data to yield robust uncertainty estimates of contamination prevalence. The model was applied to ten years (2015-2024) of monitoring data on algal biotoxins in Chamelea gallina striped clams from classified harvesting areas in the Marche Region, Italy. Given the scarcity of historical data, three prior scenarios were tested—optimistic [β(1,10)], non-informative [β(1,1)], and pessimistic [β(5,10)]—to evaluate sensitivity to prior assumptions. Analytical determinations for five toxin groups (domoic acid, saxitoxin, azaspiracid, okadaic acid, yessotoxin) showed that all results, except one sample below the maximum legal limit, were under quantification thresholds. Bayesian posterior estimates confirmed a very low probability of biotoxin accumulation above limits, even under pessimistic assumptions. The findings demonstrate the model’s capacity to generate stable, interpretable estimates and credible intervals, particularly valuable when the prevalence is not exactly zero but may be extremely small. Overall, the Bayesian β-binomial approach strengthens evidence-based decision-making in food safety surveillance, providing a transparent and adaptable tool for risk assessment and regulatory management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Accoroni S, Cangini M, Angeletti R, Losasso C, Bacchiocchi S, Costa A, Di Taranto A, Escalera L, Fedrizzi G, Garzia A, Longo F, Macaluso A, Melchiorre N, Milandri A, Milandri S, Montresor M, Neri F, Piersanti A, Rubini S, Suraci C, Susini F, Vadrucci MR, Mudadu AG, Vivaldi B, Soro B, Totti C, Zingone A, 2024. Marine phycotoxin levels in shellfish—14 years of data gathered along the Italian coast. Harmful Algae 131:102560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2023.102560

Benschop J, Spencer S, Alban L, Stevenson M, French N, 2010. Bayesian zero-inflated predictive modelling of herd-level Salmonella prevalence for risk-based surveillance. Zoonoses Pub Health 57:60-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01355.x

Barnouin G, El Hourany R, Record NR, Bajc Z, Kennedy J, Lafitte A, Dechraoui Bottein MY, 2025. Marine biotoxins in Mediterranean seafood: environmental occurrence and food safety concerns. Ecotox Environ Safety 303:119032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.119032

EFSA, 2012. Scientific Opinion on the development of a risk ranking framework on biological hazards. EFSA J 10:2724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2724

European Parliament, 2004. Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin. In: Official Journal, L 139/55, 30/04/2004.

Fernández R, Mamán L, Jaén D, Fernández Fuentes L, Ocaña MA, Gordillo MM, 2019. Dinophysis species and diarrhetic shellfish toxins: 20 years of monitoring program in Andalusia, south of Spain. Toxins 11:189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11040189

Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB, 2013. Bayesian data analysis (3rd ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b16018

Giunta della Regione Marche, 2024. Delibera n. 857 del 04/06/2024, Riclassificazione sanitaria delle zone di produzione/stabulazione dei molluschi bivalvi vivi ai sensi del Regolamento UE del 15 marzo 2019, n. 627; revoca della Deliberazione di Giunta del 20 giugno 2022, n. 773. BUR Marche LV(53), 10644.

Johnson AA, Ott MQ, Dogucu M, 2022. Bayes rules! An introduction to applied Bayesian modeling. (1st ed.) Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, FL, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429288340

Khan MA, Bruce BB, Bottichio L, Wise M, 2023. A Bayesian method for exposure prevalence comparison during foodborne disease outbreak investigations. Foodborne Pathog Dis 20:414-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2023.0059

Poletti R, 2014. Biotossine marine: origine, diffusione e controllo. Centro Ricerche Marine di Cesenatico. Available from: https://cipesalute.org/cedo/allegati/4500-BiotossineMarine.pdf.

Ranta J, Lindqvist R, Hansson I, Tuominen P, Nauta M, 2015. A Bayesian approach to the evaluation of risk-based microbiological criteria for Campylobacter in broiler meat. Ann Appl Statistics 9:1415-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/15-AOAS845

Spiegelhalter DJ, Abrams KR, Myles JP, 2004. Bayesian approaches to clinical trials and health-care evaluation. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Hoboken, NJ, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0470092602

Van der Voet H, Slob W, 2007. Integration of probabilistic exposure assessment and probabilistic hazard characterization. Risk Anal 27:351-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00887.x

Williams MS, Ebel ED, Hoeting JA, 2011. Bayesian analysis for food-safety risk assessment: evaluation of dose-response functions within WinBUGS. J Stat Software 43:1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v043.c02

How to Cite



1.
The Bayesian β-binomial model to improve the inference based on the results of sampling plans: the case study of the biotoxin monitoring plan of Chamelea gallina natural beds. Ital J Food Safety [Internet]. 2026 Feb. 3 [cited 2026 Apr. 29];. Available from: https://www.pagepressjournals.org/ijfs/article/view/14544