Conference Paper
Vol. 15 No. s1 (2026): XXXV National Conference of the Italian Association of Veterinary Food...
https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2026.16238
PO10 | GLUTEN MONITORING IN GLUTEN-FREE FOOD PRODUCTS: A FIVE-YEAR SURVEY FROM THE CRENARIA LABORATORY NETWORK (2021–2025)
Samantha Lupi1, Elisabetta Razzuoli2, Cristiana Maurella3, Francesca Lega4, Enrico Pavoni5, Olga Lai6, Francesco Paolo Serpe7, Marco Iammarino8, Francesca Ferrieri9, Jari Falomo10, Paolo Angelo Amboni11, Daniela Manila Bianchi1 | 1Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d’Aosta - Centro di Referenza Nazionale per la Rilevazione negli Alimenti di Sostanze e Prodotti che Provocano Allergie e Intolleranze – CReNaRiA, Torino, Italy; 2Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d’Aosta, S.S. Genova e Portualità Marittima, Genova, Italy; 3Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d’Aosta, SS Epidemiologia-Sicurezza Alimentare, Torino, Italy; 4Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, SCS2 – Chimica Laboratorio Anabolizzanti, Legnaro (PD), Italy; 5Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia-Romagna, Rep. Controllo Degli Alimenti, Brescia, Italy; 6Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana, UOS Salute e Benessere Animale, Roma, Italy; 7Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Dip. Coordinamento di Sicurezza Alimentare, Portici (NA), Italy; 8Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Puglia e della Basilicata, S.C. Chimica, Servizio Additivi ed Allergeni, Foggia, Italy; 9Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell’Ambiente della Puglia, Polo Specializzazione Alimenti, Bari, Italy; 10Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell’Ambiente del Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Palmanova (UD), Italy; 11Agenzia della Tutela della Salute di Bergamo, UOSD Laboratorio di Prevenzione, Bergamo, Italy.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
62
Views
40
Downloads
Nine laboratories participated in the study: IIZZSS (n=6), ARPA (n=2) and ATS (n=1). The analyzed samples belonged to the following types: bakery and pastry, flours, pasta, sauces and condiments, ready-to-eat foods, meat products and preparations, cheeses and dairy products, infant foods, food supplements, fishery products and preparations, dietary foods for special purposes, jellies and broth preparation. Samples were also classified according to the reason for sampling (RS). All laboratories are accreditated and performed the analyses by ELISA, with the Ridascreen® Gliadin kit (R-Biopharm).
During the period considered, the nine laboratories analyzed 10376 samples labeled as gluten-free. (2129 in 2021, 2059 in 2022, 1744 in 2023, 2061 in 2024 and 2383 in 2025). Most of the samples belonged to the food matrix “pasta” (41%); followed by “bakery and pastry products” (14%) and “food supplements” (10%). Regarding RS, samples were distributed as follows: 54% in “own-check”, 24% in “activities for associations”, 19% in “official control ordered by competent authorities or supervisory bodies” (“OC”), 4% in “research samples”, 1% in “food-borne allergy outbreak”, and 1% in “other”. Overall, 0.93% of samples (97 in total) showed gluten levels above the legal limit: 80.4% concerned “own-check” samples, 11.3% “research samples”, and 8.2% “OC” samples.
The collected data highlights that samples exceeding the legal gluten limits representing less than 1% (0.93%) of the total of over 10000 analyzed samples. However, temporal trend analysis shows a progressive and steady increase in the proportion of non-compliant samples, rising from 0.61% in 2021 to 1.30% in 2025. This increase was observed mainly in “own-check” RS samples, probably attributable to a growing awareness among producers in monitoring the supply chain, but also to issues related to cross-contamination at production sites. This survey reinforces the importance of: i) maintaining high levels of control throughout the agri-food supply chain, ii) harmonizing the analytical approach across the country through the use of validated methods to ensure data comparability, iii) implementing training activities for food business operators on allergen management, in order to ensure maximum safety for allergic consumers.
Project funded by the Italian Ministry of Health; IZS PLV 02/25 RC; CUP: J19I2500213001
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
1.
PO10 | GLUTEN MONITORING IN GLUTEN-FREE FOOD PRODUCTS: A FIVE-YEAR SURVEY FROM THE CRENARIA LABORATORY NETWORK (2021–2025): Samantha Lupi1, Elisabetta Razzuoli2, Cristiana Maurella3, Francesca Lega4, Enrico Pavoni5, Olga Lai6, Francesco Paolo Serpe7, Marco Iammarino8, Francesca Ferrieri9, Jari Falomo10, Paolo Angelo Amboni11, Daniela Manila Bianchi1 | 1Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d’Aosta - Centro di Referenza Nazionale per la Rilevazione negli Alimenti di Sostanze e Prodotti che Provocano Allergie e Intolleranze – CReNaRiA, Torino, Italy; 2Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d’Aosta, S.S. Genova e Portualità Marittima, Genova, Italy; 3Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d’Aosta, SS Epidemiologia-Sicurezza Alimentare, Torino, Italy; 4Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, SCS2 – Chimica Laboratorio Anabolizzanti, Legnaro (PD), Italy; 5Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia-Romagna, Rep. Controllo Degli Alimenti, Brescia, Italy; 6Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana, UOS Salute e Benessere Animale, Roma, Italy; 7Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Dip. Coordinamento di Sicurezza Alimentare, Portici (NA), Italy; 8Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Puglia e della Basilicata, S.C. Chimica, Servizio Additivi ed Allergeni, Foggia, Italy; 9Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell’Ambiente della Puglia, Polo Specializzazione Alimenti, Bari, Italy; 10Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell’Ambiente del Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Palmanova (UD), Italy; 11Agenzia della Tutela della Salute di Bergamo, UOSD Laboratorio di Prevenzione, Bergamo, Italy. Ital J Food Safety [Internet]. 2026 Sep. 2 [cited 2026 Oct. 2];15(s1). Available from: https://www.pagepressjournals.org/ijfs/article/view/16238
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s)


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.