Reviews - Oncology

Risk of urinary adverse effects of bevacizumab therapy in patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 24 December 2025
431
Views
191
Downloads

Authors

Background: Ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal malignancies affecting women, often diagnosed at advanced stages. Bevacizumab, a novel therapeutic agent, has recently demonstrated efficacy in the management of this disease. However, its use has been associated with various adverse effects reported in clinical trials. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of urinary complications linked to bevacizumab therapy in ovarian cancer patients.
Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis involved a comprehensive search of databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, covering studies up to October 2024. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared ovarian cancer patients undergoing bevacizumab treatment with those receiving other therapeutic options. The primary outcome was the relative risk (RR) of developing urinary complications, categorized based on disease grade and stage.
Results: A total of 11 interventional studies were ultimately included in the analysis. The relative risk (RR) of urinary complications in patients receiving bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy, compared to the control group treated with chemotherapy without bevacizumab, was significantly elevated for key adverse events. The overall risk of complications, regardless of type, was 1.76 times higher (RR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.18-2.61, p=0.005). Specific adverse events included a 6.13- fold increase in the risk of proteinuria (RR = 6.13, 95% CI: 2.84-13.25, p<0.001), a 5.03-fold increase for hyponatremia (RR = 5.03, 95% CI: 1.08-23.52, p=0.039), and a 2.41-fold increase for hyperkalemia (RR = 2.41, 95% CI: 0.57-10.22, p=0.232). Additionally, subgroup analysis based on grading revealed that the risk of proteinuria in the treatment group compared to controls was 6.35-fold higher for patients with grade ≤ 2 and 6.55-fold higher for those with grade ≥3.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the use of Bevacizumab in patients with ovarian cancer significantly increases the overall risk of urinary complications, particularly proteinuria. These findings could contribute to enhanced awareness, facilitating the early identification and management of these adverse effects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015; 136:E359-86.
2. Reid BM, Permuth JB, Sellers TA. Epidemiology of ovarian cancer: a review. Cancer Biol Med. 2017; 14:9-32.
3. Goff BA, Mandel LS, Melancon CH, et al. Frequency of symptoms of ovarian cancer in women presenting to primary care clinics. JAMA 2004;291:2705-12.
4. Griffiths CT, Fuller AF. Intensive surgical and chemotherapeutic management of advanced ovarian cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 1978; 58:131-42.
5. Bell J, Brady MF, Young RC, et al. Randomized phase III trial of three versus six cycles of adjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel in early stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 102:432-9.
6. Simpkins F, Belinson JL, Rose PG. Avoiding bevacizumab related gastrointestinal toxicity for recurrent ovarian cancer by careful patient screening. Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 107:118-23.
7. Perren TJ, Swart AM, Pfisterer J, et al. A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365:2484-96.
8. Pignata S, Lorusso D, Joly F, et al. Carboplatin-based doublet plus bevacizumab beyond progression versus carboplatin-based doublet alone in patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021; 22:267-76.
9. Pirzaman AT, Ebrahimi P, Doostmohamadian S, et al. 5-flourouracil-induced toxicity in both male and female reproductive systems: A narrative review. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2023; 42:9603271231217988. Erratum in: Hum Exp Toxicol 2023;42:9603271231224521.
10. Gurevich F, Perazella MA. Renal effects of anti-angiogenesis therapy: update for the internist. Am J Med. 2009; 122:322-8.
11. Sugimoto H, Hamano Y, Charytan D, et al. Neutralization of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by anti-VEGF antibodies and soluble VEGF receptor 1 (sFlt-1) induces proteinuria. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278:12605-8.
12. Advani A, Kelly DJ, Advani SL, et al. Role of VEGF in maintaining renal structure and function under normotensive and hypertensive conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:14448-53.
13. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 134:103-12.
14. National Cancer Institute. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE). 2024.
15. Schlaeppi JM, Eppenberger U, Martiny-Baron G, et al. Chemiluminescence immunoassay for vascular endothelial growth factor (vascular permeability factor) in tumor-tissue homogenates. Clinical chemistry. 1996; 42:1777-84.
16. Begg CB, Berlin JA. Publication bias and dissemination of clinical research. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989; 81:107-15.
17. Burger RA, Brady MF, Bookman MA, et al. Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365:2473-83.
18. Coleman RL, Brady MF, Herzog TJ, et al. Bevacizumab and paclitaxel-carboplatin chemotherapy and secondary cytoreduction in recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study GOG-0213): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:779-91.
19. Garcia Garcia Y, de Juan Ferré A, Mendiola C, et al. Efficacy and safety results from GEICO 1205, a randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019;29:1050-56.
20. Gore M, Hackshaw A, Brady WE, et al. An international, phase III randomized trial in patients with mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (mEOC/GOG 0241) with long-term follow-up: and experience of conducting a clinical trial in a rare gynecological tumor. Gynecol Oncol. 2019; 153:541-48.
21. Mirza MR, Åvall Lundqvist E, Birrer MJ, et al. Niraparib plus bevacizumab versus niraparib alone for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (NSGO-AVANOVA2/ENGOT-ov24): a randomised, phase 2, superiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20:1409-19.
22. Pujade-Lauraine E, Hilpert F, Weber B, et al. Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: The AURELIA open-label randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32:1302-8.
23. Ray-Coquard I, Harter P, Lorusso D, et al. Effect of weekly paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab on progression-free rate among patients with relapsed ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors: the ALIENOR/ENGOT-ov7 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020; 6:1923-30.
24. Roque DM, Siegel ER, Buza N, et al. Randomised phase II trial of weekly ixabepilone ± biweekly bevacizumab for platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2022; 126:1695-703.
25. Shoji T, Enomoto T, Abe M, et al. Efficacy and safety of standard of care with/without bevacizumab for platinum-resistant ovarian/fallopian tube/peritoneal cancer previously treated with bevacizumab: the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study JGOG3023. Cancer Sci. 2022; 113:240-50.
26. Lafayette RA, McCall B, Li N, et al. Incidence and relevance of proteinuria in bevacizumab-treated patients: pooled analysis from randomized controlled trials. Am J Nephrol. 2014; 40:75-83.
27. Gheorghe A-D, Zob D, Stanculeanu D-L. Adverse events of bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Rev Chim (Bucharest) 2020; 71:140-44.
28. Wu S, Kim C, Baer L, et al. Bevacizumab increases risk for severe proteinuria in cancer patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010; 21:1381-9.
29. Zhao T, Wang X, Xu T, et al. Bevacizumab significantly increases the risks of hypertension and proteinuria in cancer patients: A systematicreview and comprehensive meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8:51492-506.
30. Izzedine H, Massard C, Spano JP, et al. VEGF signalling inhibition-induced proteinuria: Mechanisms, significance and management. Eur J Cancer. 2010; 46:439-48.
31. Shord SS, Bressler LR, Tierney LA, et al. Understanding and managing the possible adverse effects associated with bevacizumab. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009; 66:999-1013.
32. Eremina V, Jefferson JA, Kowalewska J, et al. VEGF inhibition and renal thrombotic microangiopathy. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1129-36.
33. Tanaka H, Takahashi K, Yamaguchi K, et al. Hypertension and proteinuria as predictive factors of effects of bevacizumab on advanced breast cancer in Japan. Biol Pharm Bull. 2018; 41:644-8.
34. Wu PF, Lin CH, Kuo CH, et al. A pilot study of bevacizumab combined with etoposide and cisplatin in breast cancer patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. BMC Cancer. 2015; 15:299.
35. Verzicco I, Regolisti G, Quaini F, et al. Electrolyte disorders induced by antineoplastic drugs. Front Oncol. 2020;10:779.
36. Shaikh A, Wiisanen ME, Gunderson HD, et al. Acquired Fanconi syndrome after treatment with capecitabine, irinotecan, and bevacizumab. Ann Pharmacother 2009;43:1370-3.

How to Cite



Risk of urinary adverse effects of bevacizumab therapy in patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025). Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 97(4). https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2025.14659