Original Papers - Oncology

A national perspective on the management of high-risk BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in Romania

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 24 December 2025
442
Views
194
Downloads

Authors

Purpose: BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) remains a persistent challenge. This study examines Romanian urologists’ clinical practices, focusing on treatment preferences and awareness of emerging therapies for BCG-unresponsive disease.
Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey comprising 24 items was distributed to selected urologists who manage NMIBC via professional mailing lists. Data were collected between May 15 and June 30, 2025.
Results: Out of 400 invited urologists, 216 completed the survey. Radical cystectomy (RC) was the most preferred treatment for BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, recommended by 67% of respondents, followed by tumor resection with surveillance (15%), repeat BCG instillation (14%), and intravesical chemotherapy (4%). Neither clinical trials nor intravenous checkpoint inhibitors were used. Among those using intravesical chemotherapy, gemcitabine was the most commonly used agent (85%), followed by mitomycin C (5%), gemcitabine/docetaxel (4%), gemcitabine/ mitomycin C (3%), docetaxel (2%), and valrubicin (1%). Oncological safety concerns were the main barrier to adopting bladder-sparing therapies. Awareness of FDA-approved therapies for BCG-unresponsive disease, Nadofaragene firadenovec, Nogapendekin alfa inbakicept-pmln, and Pembrolizumab, was limited; 61% of urologists were unaware of all three, and only 1% had used any. BCG shortages were reported by 93% of respondents at some point, who adapted by reducing doses and prioritizing high-grade T1 and CIS cases. Most recognized intravesical chemotherapy as an alternative and were willing to use it if needed.
Conclusions: Though RC remains the predominant approach for BCG-unresponsive cases, over half of urologists’ report using intravesical chemotherapy, reflecting interest in bladder-sparing strategies rather than newly approved FDA agents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1. Babjuk M, Burger M, Capoun O, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (Ta, T1, and carcinoma in situ). Eur Urol 2022; 81:75-94.
2. Holzbeierlein JM, Bixler BR, Buckley DI, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: AUA/SUO guideline: 2024 amendment. J Urol 2024; 211:533-538. Erratum in: J Urol 2024; 212:936.
3. van den Bosch S, Alfred Witjes J. Long-term cancer-specific survival in patients with high-risk, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and tumour progression: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2011;60:493-500.
4. Harvey M, Chislett B, Perera M, et al. Critical shortage in BCG immunotherapy: how did we get here and where will it take us? Urol Oncol 2022; 40:1-3.
5. Nazmifar M, Williams C, Naser-Tavakolian A, et al. Clinical and preclinical therapies for bladder cancer following Bacillus Calmette-Guérin failure. J Urol 2023; 209:32-48.
6. Karl A, Adejoro O, Saigal C, et al. General adherence to guideline recommendations on initial diagnosis of bladder cancer in the United States and influencing factors. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2014;12:270-7.
7. Matulay JT, Tabayoyong W, Duplisea JJ, et al. Variability in adherence to guidelines based management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer among Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) members. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:796. e1-796.e6.
8. Petre I, Barna F, Gurgus D, et al. Analysis of the healthcare system in Romania: a brief review. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2069.
9. Moussa M, Abou Chakra M, Shore ND, et al. Patterns of treatment of high-risk BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients among Arab urologists. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2024; 96:12244.
10. Abou Chakra M, Shore ND, Dillon R, O'Donnell MA. US clinical practice patterns of intravesical chemotherapy for Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-exposed nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. Urol Pract 2024; 11:97-107.
11. Broughton EI, Chun DS, Gooden KM, et al. Treatment and disease management patterns for bacillus Calmette-Guérin unresponsive nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer in North America, Europe and Asia: A real-world data analysis. Curr Urol 2022; 16:147-153.
12. Broughton EI, Gooden KM, Mycock KL, et al. Multi-country clinical practice patterns, including use of biomarkers, among physicians' treatment of BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). BMC Urol 2022; 22:27.
13. Abou Chakra M, Packiam VT, O'Donnell MA. Real-world efficacy of adjuvant single-agent intravesical gemcitabine for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2023; 24:2081-2091. Erratum in: Expert Opin Pharmacother 2024; 25:121.
14. Abou Chakra M, Packiam VT, Duquesne I, et al. Combination intravesical chemotherapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) as first-line or rescue therapy: where do we stand now? Expert Opin Pharmacother 2024; 25:203-214.
15. Scilipoti P, Moschini M, Li R, et al. The financial burden of localized and metastatic bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2025; 87:536-550.
16. Myers AA, Steinmetz AR, Kamat AM. The evolving role of multidisciplinary teams in optimizing non-muscle invasive bladder cancer care. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2024; 24:1203-1208.

How to Cite



A national perspective on the management of high-risk BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in Romania. (2025). Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 97(4). https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2025.14596