Authors’ response to Comments on “Why do emergency department clinicians miss acute aortic syndrome? A case series and descriptive analysis”
https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2023.11470
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Dear Editor,
We thank Vercelli et al.1 for their comments on our paper: Why do emergency department clinicians miss acute aortic syndrome? A case series and descriptive analysis.
We fully agree with the authors, that investigating the heart and aorta using POCUS may allow for an earlier diagnosis and therefore more expedient treatment of a patient with acute aortic syndrome (AAS). We would also agree with the authors that POCUS is a point of care test with good specificity for the detection of AAS (i.e., it may be good at ruling in the diagnosis) but has poor sensitivity for the detection of AAS (i.e., it is not good at ruling out the diagnosis).[...]
Vercelli A, Berardi E, Poggiali E. Comments on “Why do emergency department clinicians miss acute aortic syndrome? A case series and descriptive analysis”. Emerg care J 2023;19:11433.
McLatchie R, Wilson S, Reed M, et al. Why do emergency department clinicians miss acute aortic syndrome? A case series and descriptive analysis. Emerg Care J 2023;19:11153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2023.11153
Copyright (c) 2023 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Downloads
Citations
