Session VI - Extracellular vesicles
Vol. 99 No. s1 (2026): Abstract Book del 98° Congresso Nazionale della Società Italiana di...
https://doi.org/10.4081/jbr.2026.15374

122 | Tangential flow filtration enables high-yield isolation and stable characterization of grape-derived extracellular vesicles for therapeutic application

Sabino Porro1|2, Tamer Esmail1|2, Francesca D’Ascanio1|2|3, Giulia Colasante1|2, Arianna Aquilini-Mummolo,1|2, Luana D’Onofrio1|2, Mariagiulia Filoso1|2, Ayesha Younas1|2, Isabel Maria Vallejo Bermudez4|5, Camilla Cichella1|2, Michela Battistelli6, Anna Piro7, Serena Veschi7, Serena Pilato7, Antonella Fontana7, Alessandro Cama7, Angelo Cichelli8, Paola Lanuti1|2, Federica Flamminii9 | 1Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University “G d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, Italy; 2Center for Advanced Studies and Technology CAST; 3Molecular Immunology Group CTS208 Department of Humanities, Law and Economics, Leonardo da Vinci University, Torrevecchia Teatina, Italy; 4Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain; 5Immunology and Allergy Group GC01, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba IMIBIC, University of Cordoba, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain; 6Department of Biomolecular Sciences DISB University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Italy; 7Department of Pharmacy, University “G d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, Italy; 8Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, University “G d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, Italy; 9Department of Promotion of Human Sciences and Quality of Life, San Raffaele Telematic University, Rome, Italy.

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 31 March 2026
Published: 31 March 2026
41
Views

Authors

Grapes produce extracellular vesicles (EVs) that have gained considerable attention in recent years due to their potential applications in food, nutrition, dermatology and health. This study presents a comprehensive comparison of grape juice-derived EV isolation methods using ultracentrifugation, and tangential flow filtration. We demonstrated that tangential flow filtration yielded more grape juice-derived EVs than ultracentrifugation while preserving structural integrity. The EVs isolated were characterized using different biophysical techniques, including flow cytometry, nanoparticle tracking analysis, zeta potential, atomic force microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. EVs isolated by ultracentrifugation displayed an average diameter of 182±90 nm, while the zeta potential was -35+ 12 mV . Atomic force microscopy and transmission electron microscopy confirmed their sizes as well as vesicular nature (i.e. their spherical shape). Flow cytometry analyses of their phenotypes showed that juice-derived EVs isolated by ultracentrifugation expressed typical plant-derived EV markers, such as penetration 1 and tetraspanin 8. Grape juice-derived EVs isolated using tangential flow filtration also showed similar results: an average diameter of 182±117 nm, a average zeta potential of -37+ 2 mV, a spherical shape, and the positivity to penetration 1 and tetraspanin 8. However, the recovery obtained by tangential flow filtration (46.3+11%) was significantly higher compared to that obtained by ultracentrifugation (14.8+ 6% ). Therefore, tangential flow filtration represents a robust and scalable approach for the isolation of grape juice–derived EVs, yielding vesicles with preserved structural and phenotypic characteristics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite



122 | Tangential flow filtration enables high-yield isolation and stable characterization of grape-derived extracellular vesicles for therapeutic application: Sabino Porro1|2, Tamer Esmail1|2, Francesca D’Ascanio1|2|3, Giulia Colasante1|2, Arianna Aquilini-Mummolo,1|2, Luana D’Onofrio1|2, Mariagiulia Filoso1|2, Ayesha Younas1|2, Isabel Maria Vallejo Bermudez4|5, Camilla Cichella1|2, Michela Battistelli6, Anna Piro7, Serena Veschi7, Serena Pilato7, Antonella Fontana7, Alessandro Cama7, Angelo Cichelli8, Paola Lanuti1|2, Federica Flamminii9 | 1Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University “G d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, Italy; 2Center for Advanced Studies and Technology CAST; 3Molecular Immunology Group CTS208 Department of Humanities, Law and Economics, Leonardo da Vinci University, Torrevecchia Teatina, Italy; 4Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain; 5Immunology and Allergy Group GC01, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba IMIBIC, University of Cordoba, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain; 6Department of Biomolecular Sciences DISB University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Italy; 7Department of Pharmacy, University “G d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, Italy; 8Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, University “G d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, Italy; 9Department of Promotion of Human Sciences and Quality of Life, San Raffaele Telematic University, Rome, Italy. (2026). Journal of Biological Research - Bollettino Della Società Italiana Di Biologia Sperimentale, 99(s1). https://doi.org/10.4081/jbr.2026.15374