Session V - Environmental pollution and health
Vol. 99 No. s1 (2026): Abstract Book del 98° Congresso Nazionale della Società Italiana di...
https://doi.org/10.4081/jbr.2026.15360

108 | Emerging models for emerging contaminants

Camilla Mossotto1|2, Alice Gabetti1, Alessandra Maganza1|2, Alessia Merialdi1, Antonia Concetta Elia2, Monia Renzi3, Giuseppe Esposito1, Marino Prearo1, Caterina Faggio4, Paolo Pastorino1 | 1Istituto Zooprofilattico del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d’Aosta, Torino, Italy; 2Università di Perugia, Italy; 3Università degli Studi di Trieste, Italy; 4Università degli Studi di Messina, Italy.

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 31 March 2026
Published: 31 March 2026
17
Views

Authors

Marine ecotoxicological risk assessment relies on a limited range of biological models, particularly in the case of benthic environments, thereby limiting the ecological realism of toxicity evaluations. Although echinoderms are widely recognised as sensitive and ecologically relevant organisms, experimental research has predominantly focused on sea urchins, leaving other echinoderm classes insufficiently explored. This study combines a critical literature review on sea stars (class Asteroidea) and brittle stars (class Ophiuroidea) with targeted experimental evidence to evaluate their potential as models for assessing emerging contaminants in marine ecosystems. A systematic evaluation of ecotoxicological studies published over the past two decades was conducted to assess the use of sea stars and brittle stars in toxicity testing, with particular attention to experimental design, biological endpoints, and ethical considerations. The analysis reveals that research on these classes is sporadic and unevenly distributed, with a strong emphasis on bioaccumulation endpoints and a focus primarily on metal exposure, while only a limited number of studies have addressed emerging contaminants. In contrast, fewer studies have investigated functional or physiological endpoints. Moreover, the literature suggests that both sea stars and brittle stars exhibit a range of sensitive, non-lethal endpoints suitable for repeated measures testing and long-term exposure scenarios. Based on the identified knowledge gaps, targeted experimental assays were designed to explore the applicability of brittle stars as models for emerging contaminants. Two brittle star species collected from the gulf of La Spezia (Ligurian Sea, Italy) were exposed for seven days to gadolinium, a rare earth element increasingly detected in aquatic environments due to its widespread use in medical imaging and green technologies, across a concentration range of 0 to 1000 µg/L. This short-term exposure was used to establish baseline tolerance and assess sublethal physiological responsiveness. The absence of acute mortality, together with the detection of measurable oxidative stress responses, supports the suitability of brittle stars for controlled laboratory testing and potential chronic exposure studies. Overall, this work highlights the potential of sea stars and brittle stars as emerging ecotoxicological models for investigating poorly studied contaminants within echinoderm research. Incorporating these taxa more systematically into ecotoxicological bioassay frameworks could broaden taxonomic coverage and enhance the ecological relevance of marine pollution assessments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite



108 | Emerging models for emerging contaminants: Camilla Mossotto1|2, Alice Gabetti1, Alessandra Maganza1|2, Alessia Merialdi1, Antonia Concetta Elia2, Monia Renzi3, Giuseppe Esposito1, Marino Prearo1, Caterina Faggio4, Paolo Pastorino1 | 1Istituto Zooprofilattico del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d’Aosta, Torino, Italy; 2Università di Perugia, Italy; 3Università degli Studi di Trieste, Italy; 4Università degli Studi di Messina, Italy. (2026). Journal of Biological Research - Bollettino Della Società Italiana Di Biologia Sperimentale, 99(s1). https://doi.org/10.4081/jbr.2026.15360