Session III - Biotechnology & bioengineering innovations
Vol. 99 No. s1 (2026): Abstract Book del 98° Congresso Nazionale della Società Italiana di...
https://doi.org/10.4081/jbr.2026.15304

052 | Metabolic analysis of farm animal plasma by 1H-NMR: variation and preliminary spectral characterization

Luca Cicero1, Silvia Orecchio1, Aldo Migliazzo1, Valeria Vitale Badaco1, Stefano Burgio3, Tiziana Orefice1, Giuseppe La Corte1, Antonino La Corte1, Grazia Scuderi2, Paolo Fagone2, Giovanni Cassata1 | 1Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia, Italy; 2Università degli Studi di Catania, Italy; 3Università di Enna "Kore", Italy.

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 31 March 2026
Published: 31 March 2026
18
Views

Authors

Metabolomics is an increasingly important discipline in the life sciences, as it allows for a comprehensive description of an organism's physiological state through the analysis of its metabolites. Among the available techniques, proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-NMR) represents a reliable and reproducible tool for the study of biofluids such as plasma and serum, thanks to its non-destructive nature, rapid analysis, and high degree of standardization. This approach allows for the simultaneous detection of numerous metabolic compounds, providing a detailed biochemical profile of the organism. In the livestock sector, 1H-NMR-based metabolomics is emerging as a promising method for monitoring animal health and welfare, while NMR analysis of ovine plasma remains largely unexplored. This work applied 1H-NMR to the preliminary characterization of the metabolic profile of sheep plasma from different farms. Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein, collected with lithium heparin, centrifuged, and stored at –80°C until analysis. Spectra were acquired with a Bruker 7 Tesla spectrometer (300 MHz) and processed using standard Fourier transformation, phase correction, and chemical alignment procedures. Results showed a clear separation between the metabolic profiles of animals from different farms, demonstrating the potential of 1H-NMR to detect specific metabolic “fingerprints.” Semi-quantitative analysis showed that lactate and circulating lipids were the dominant spectral components, while glucose, alanine, BCAAs, choline-containing compounds, and creatine were present at moderate or low intensities. Two subgroups were identified: one with relatively higher levels of lactate, lipids, glucose, BCAAs, and choline, consistent with a more metabolically active phenotype; the other with lower metabolic intensities, indicative of a more conservative energy state. Overall, these differences suggest the presence of distinct physiological states within the cohort, likely related to recent activity, nutritional status, or metabolic efficiency of the animals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

1. Emwas AH, Roy R, McKay RT, et al. NMR spectroscopy for metabolomics research. Metabolites 2019;9:123.

2. Ma S, Xia M, Gao X. Biomarker discovery in atherosclerotic diseases using quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021;8:681444.

3. Piccioli Cappelli F, Seal CJ, Wiseman J, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomics for animal nutrition and health. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2018;243:42-52.

4. Dona AC, Jiménez B, Schäfer H, et al. Precision high-throughput proton NMR spectroscopy of human urine, serum, and plasma for large-scale metabolic phenotyping. Anal Chem 2014;86:9887-94.

5. Wishart DS. Metabolomics for investigating physiological and pathophysiological processes. Physiol Rev 2019;99:1819-1875.

How to Cite



052 | Metabolic analysis of farm animal plasma by 1H-NMR: variation and preliminary spectral characterization: Luca Cicero1, Silvia Orecchio1, Aldo Migliazzo1, Valeria Vitale Badaco1, Stefano Burgio3, Tiziana Orefice1, Giuseppe La Corte1, Antonino La Corte1, Grazia Scuderi2, Paolo Fagone2, Giovanni Cassata1 | 1Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia, Italy; 2Università degli Studi di Catania, Italy; 3Università di Enna "Kore", Italy. (2026). Journal of Biological Research - Bollettino Della Società Italiana Di Biologia Sperimentale, 99(s1). https://doi.org/10.4081/jbr.2026.15304