Original Articles Open access

Unraveling bortezomib resistance in multiple myeloma: insights from RNA-Seq and PI3K/mTOR pathway analysis

Authors

Published
4 February 2026
Section
Original Articles
DOI
10.4081/jbr.2026.14187

Abstract

Multiple Myeloma (MM), characterized by abnormal plasma cell proliferation, lacks curative treatment due to drug resistance, notably against Bortezomib, a critical proteasome inhibitor. To elucidate resistance mechanisms, we conducted RNA sequencing on Bortezomib-sensitive and resistant RPMI-8226 MM cells, comparing them to healthy B-cells. Differential expression analysis highlighted significant alterations in immune signaling, proteasome function, and metabolism. Resistant MM cells exhibited decreased antigen-presentation genes (HLA-DRA, HLA-DPA1, CD74), indicating immune evasion. Downregulation of metabolic regulators like GLUL and MDK suggested a glycolytic metabolic shift, whereas enhanced proteasome activities and nucleocytoplasmic transport represented adaptive strategies against proteotoxic stress. Importantly, resistant cells showed notable upregulation of PRAME and FAF1 genes, as oncogenes and apoptosis-related genes linked to therapy resistance.  Pathway analysis revealed enrichment in neurodegenerative disease-related pathways, suggesting common protein misfolding mechanisms in MM progression. Additionally, resistant cells displayed cross-resistance to the dual phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor BEZ235, with a four-fold increase in IC₅₀ values, reflecting enhanced survival signaling and metabolic flexibility. These findings underscore the multifaceted nature of Bortezomib resistance, driven by metabolic reprogramming, immune modulation, and translational regulation. Targeting these adaptive pathways through combination therapies involving proteasome inhibitors, metabolic modulators, and autophagy inhibitors may present novel strategies to overcome drug resistance in MM.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Alexander DD, Mink PJ, Adami HO, et al. Multiple myeloma: a review of the epidemiologic literature. Int J Cancer 2007;120:40-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.22718
  2. 2. Morgan GJ, Walker BA, Davies FE. The genetic architecture of multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Cancer 2012;12:335-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3257
  3. 3. Fairfield H, Falank C, Avery L, Reagan MR. Multiple myeloma in the marrow: pathogenesis and treatments: Understanding the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2016;1364:32-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13038
  4. 4. Kingsley LA, Fournier PGJ, Chirgwin JM, Guise TA. Molecular biology of bone metastasis. Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6:2609-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-0234
  5. 5. Schmitt SM, Deshmukh RR, Dou QP. Proteasome inhibitors and lessons learned from their mechanisms of action and resistance in human cancer. In: Resistance to Targeted Anti-Cancer Therapeutics. Springer International Publishing; 2014:1-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06752-0_1
  6. 6. Maiso P, Huynh D, Moschetta M, et al. Metabolic signature identifies novel targets for drug resistance in multiple myeloma. Cancer Res 2015;75:2071-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3400
  7. 7. Saavedra-García P, Roman-Trufero M, Al-Sadah HA, et al. Systems level profiling of chemotherapy-induced stress resolution in cancer cells reveals druggable trade-offs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021;118:e2018229118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2018229118
  8. 8. Schwestermann J, Besse A, Driessen C, Besse L. Contribution of the tumor microenvironment to metabolic changes triggering resistance of multiple myeloma to proteasome inhibitors. Front Oncol 2022;12:899272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.899272
  9. 9. Pelon M, Krzeminski P, Tracz-Gaszewska Z, Misiewicz-Krzeminska I. Factors determining the sensitivity to proteasome inhibitors of multiple myeloma cells. Front Pharmacol 2024;15:1351565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1351565
  10. 10. Ikeda H, Hideshima T, Fulciniti M, et al. PI3K/p110{delta} is a novel therapeutic target in multiple myeloma. Blood 2010;116:1460-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-06-222943
  11. 11. Ramakrishnan V, Kumar S. PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in multiple myeloma: from basic biology to clinical promise. Leuk Lymphoma 2018;59:2524-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2017.1421760
  12. 12. Heinemann L, Möllers KM, Ahmed HMM, et al. Inhibiting PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling in multiple myeloma-associated mesenchymal stem cells impedes the proliferation of multiple myeloma cells. Front Oncol 2022;12:874325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.874325
  13. 13. Piddock RE, Bowles KM, Rushworth SA. The role of PI3K isoforms in regulating bone marrow microenvironment signaling focusing on acute myeloid leukemia and multiple myeloma. Cancers (Basel) 2017;9:29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers9040029
  14. 14. Akcora-Yildiz D, Gonulkirmaz N, Ozkan T, et al. HIV-1 integrase inhibitor raltegravir promotes DNA damage-induced apoptosis in multiple myeloma. Chem Biol Drug Des 2023;102:262-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.14237
  15. 15. Xing H, Yang X, Liu T, et al. The study of resistant mechanisms and reversal in an imatinib resistant Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line. Leuk Res 2012;36:509-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2011.12.018
  16. 16. Fan Y, Chiu JF, Liu J, et al. Resveratrol induces autophagy-dependent apoptosis in HL-60 cells. BMC Cancer 2018;18:581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4504-5
  17. 17. Rump LV, Asamoah B, Gonzalez-Escalona N. Comparison of commercial RNA extraction kits for preparation of DNA-free total RNA from Salmonella cells. BMC Res Notes 2010;3:211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-211
  18. 18. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014;30:2114-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
  19. 19. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010;26:139-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616
  20. 20. Adrian Alexa JR. topGO. Bioconductor; 2017. doi:10.18129/B9.BIOC.TOPGO
  21. 21. Yang J, Wang F, Chen B. HLA-DPA1 gene is a potential predictor with prognostic values in multiple myeloma. BMC Cancer 2020;20:915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07393-0
  22. 22. Bieghs L, Johnsen HE, Maes K, et al. The insulin-like growth factor system in multiple myeloma: diagnostic and therapeutic potential. Oncotarget 2016;7:48732-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8982
  23. 23. Chen Z, Luo HY, Basran RK, et al. A T-to-G transversion at nucleotide -567 upstream of HBG2 in a GATA-1 binding motif is associated with elevated hemoglobin F. Mol Cell Biol 2008;28:4386-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00071-08
  24. 24. Olthof SG, Fatrai S, Drayer AL, et al. Downregulation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5) in CD34+ cells promotes megakaryocytic development, whereas activation of STAT5 drives erythropoiesis. Stem Cells 2008;26:1732-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2007-0899
  25. 25. Meeuwsen MH, Wouters AK, Wachsmann TLA, et al. Broadly applicable TCR-based therapy for multiple myeloma targeting the immunoglobulin J chain. J Hematol Oncol 2023;16:16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-023-01408-6
  26. 26. Chanukuppa V, Paul D, Taunk K, et al. Proteomics and functional study reveal marginal zone B and B1 cell specific protein as a candidate marker of multiple myeloma. Int J Oncol 2020;57:325-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2020.5056
  27. 27. Zhao C, Inoue J, Imoto I, et al. POU2AF1, an amplification target at 11q23, promotes growth of multiple myeloma cells by directly regulating expression of a B-cell maturation factor, TNFRSF17. Oncogene 2008;27:63-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210637
  28. 28. Lou X, Deng W, Shuai L, et al. RAI2 acts as a tumor suppressor with functional significance in gastric cancer. Aging (Albany NY) 2023;15:11831-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.205135
  29. 29. Han J, Deng H, Lyu Y, et al. Identification of N-glycoproteins of knee cartilage from adult osteoarthritis and Kashin-Beck disease based on quantitative glycoproteomics, compared with normal control cartilage. Cells 2022;11:2513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11162513
  30. 30. Deitiker P, Oshima M, Jankovic J, Atassi MZ. Influences of HLA DRB1, DQA1 and DQB1 on T-cell recognition of epitopes and of larger regions of the botulinum neurotoxin molecule. Immunol Lett 2017;190:257-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2017.07.016
  31. 31. Yan Y, Chen R, Wang X, et al. CCL19 and CCR7 expression, signaling pathways, and adjuvant functions in viral infection and prevention. Front Cell Dev Biol 2019;7:212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2019.00212
  32. 32. Zhou P, Zhang C, Song X, et al. ΔNp63α promotes Bortezomib resistance via the CYGB-ROS axis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Death Dis 2022;13:327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-04790-0
  33. 33. Wu Q, Yang Z, Nie Y, et al. Multi-drug resistance in cancer chemotherapeutics: mechanisms and lab approaches. Cancer Lett 2014;347:159-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2014.03.013
  34. 34. Sengsayadeth S, Malard F, Savani BN, et al. Posttransplant maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma: the changing landscape. Blood Cancer J 2017;7:e545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2017.23
  35. 35. Zhou J, Zhang M, Zhang Y, et al. Identification of potential prognostic biomarker for predicting survival in multiple myeloma using bioinformatics analysis and experiments. Front Genet 2021;12:722132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.722132
  36. 36. Zisi A, Bartek J, Lindström MS. Targeting ribosome biogenesis in cancer: Lessons learned and way forward. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14:2126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14092126
  37. 37. Chauhan D, Hideshima T, Anderson KC. Proteasome inhibition in multiple myeloma: therapeutic implication. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2005;45:465-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.100037
  38. 38. Gozzetti A, Papini G, Candi V, et al. Second generation proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 2017;17:920-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1871520616666160902101622
  39. 39. Albert B, Kos-Braun IC, Henras AK, et al. A ribosome assembly stress response regulates transcription to maintain proteome homeostasis. Elife 2019;8:45002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45002
  40. 40. Aronson LI, Davies FE. DangER: protein ovERload. Targeting protein degradation to treat myeloma. Haematologica 2012;97:1119-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2012.064923
  41. 41. Weir P, Donaldson D, McMullin MF, Crawford L. Metabolic alterations in multiple myeloma: From oncogenesis to proteasome inhibitor resistance. Cancers (Basel) 2023;15:1682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15061682
  42. 42. Zaal EA, Wu W, Jansen G, et al. Bortezomib resistance in multiple myeloma is associated with increased serine synthesis. Cancer Metab. 2017;5(1):7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40170-017-0169-9
  43. 43. Di Lernia G, Leone P, Solimando AG, et al. Bortezomib treatment modulates autophagy in multiple myeloma. J Clin Med 2020;9:552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020552
  44. 44. Turner JG, Dawson J, Sullivan DM. Nuclear export of proteins and drug resistance in cancer. Biochem Pharmacol 2012;83:1021-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2011.12.016
  45. 45. Tye BW, Commins N, Ryazanova LV, et al. Proteotoxicity from aberrant ribosome biogenesis compromises cell fitness. Elife 2019;8:e43002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43002
  46. 46. Nag S, Qin J, Srivenugopal KS, et al. The MDM2-p53 pathway revisited. J Biomed Res 2013;27:254-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7555/JBR.27.20130030
  47. 47. Huang J, Dibble CC, Matsuzaki M, Manning BD. The TSC1-TSC2 complex is required for proper activation of mTOR complex 2. Mol Cell Biol 2008;28:4104-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00289-08
  48. 48. Tsai PJ, Lai YH, Manne RK, et al. Akt: a key transducer in cancer. J Biomed Sci 2022;29:76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-022-00860-9
  49. 49. Nelson ED, Benesch MG, Wu R, et al. High EIF4EBP1 expression reflects mTOR pathway activity and cancer cell proliferation and is a biomarker for poor breast cancer prognosis. Am J Cancer Res 2024;14:227-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62347/MTSD6746
  50. 50. Ri M, Iida S, Nakashima T, et al. Bortezomib-resistant myeloma cell lines: a role for mutated PSMB5 in preventing the accumulation of unfolded proteins and fatal ER stress. Leukemia 2010;24:1506-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2010.137
  51. 51. Rückrich T, Kraus M, Gogel J, et al. Characterization of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in Bortezomib-adapted cells. Leukemia 2009;23:1098-05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2009.8
  52. 52. Brancolini C, Iuliano L. Proteotoxic stress and cell death in cancer cells. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12:2385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092385
  53. 53. Browne IM, Okines AFC. Resistance to targeted inhibitors of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in advanced oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024;16:2259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16122259
  54. 54. Roué G, Pérez-Galán P, Mozos A, et al. The Hsp90 inhibitor IPI-504 overcomes Bortezomib resistance in mantle cell lymphoma in vitro and in vivo by down-regulation of the prosurvival ER chaperone BiP/Grp78. Blood 2011;117:1270-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-04-278853
  55. 55. Nair R, Gupta P, Shanmugam M. Mitochondrial metabolic determinants of multiple myeloma growth, survival, and therapy efficacy. Front Oncol 2022;12:1000106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1000106
  56. 56. Rendo MJ, Joseph JJ, Phan LM, DeStefano CB. CAR T-Cell therapy for patients with multiple myeloma: Current evidence and challenges. Blood Lymphatic Cancer Targets Ther 2022;12:119-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/BLCTT.S327016
  57. 57. Park MY, Ryu SW, Kim KD, et al. Fas-associated factor-1 mediates chemotherapeutic-induced apoptosis via death effector filament formation. Int J Cancer 2005;115:412-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.20857
  58. 58. Yu C, Kim BS, Kim E. FAF1 mediates regulated necrosis through PARP1 activation upon oxidative stress leading to dopaminergic neurodegeneration. Cell Death Differ 2016;23:1873-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2016.99
  59. 59. Tyrna P, Procyk G, Szeleszczuk Ł, Młynarczuk-Biały I. Different strategies to overcome resistance to proteasome inhibitors-A summary 20 years after their introduction. Int J Mol Sci 2024;25:8949. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168949

Metrics

Citations and online attention from Dimensions, Altmetric and PlumX.

PlumX Metrics

License

Copyright (c) 2026 the Author(s)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.