Beyond the Glasgow Coma Scale: an integrative review of new tools for neurological assessment in the intensive care unit for adult patients
https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2024.12121
Accepted: 22 January 2024
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is a widely used clinical tool for assessing impaired consciousness, but concerns arise when applied to intubated patients or those receiving analgesics, sedatives, and paralytics because verbal scores are not evaluable. Furthermore, the GCS does not differentiate the neurological status of the patient once intubated, resulting in poor reliability in neurological assessment, and clinical indicators that may reflect the severity of the coma are not included in the GCS. This study explores alternative tools for neurological assessment in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) when GCS is impractical. Conducting an integrative review of studies from 2018 to 2022, we identified seven relevant papers. Results indicate the FOUR score as a promising GCS alternative, particularly in cases where the GCS is unavailable. Automated pupillometry also demonstrated the potential for monitoring neurologically impaired ICU patients. These tools, independent of verbal responses and applicable to sedated patients, offer improved accuracy in assessing consciousness. The study emphasizes the importance of adopting such alternatives, and addressing GCS limitations, and highlights the need for further research and implementation to enhance patient care in ICU settings.
Giusti GD, Mistraletti G. Neurological, Pain, Sedation, and Delirium Assessment. In: Nursing in Critical Care Setting. Springer, Cham. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50559-6_2
Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974;2:81-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(74)91639-0
Balestreri M, Czosnyka M, Chatfield DA, et al. Predictive value of Glasgow Coma Scale after brain trauma: change in trend over the past ten years. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:161-2.
Iyer VN, Mandrekar JN, Danielson RD, et al. Validity of the FOUR score coma scale in the medical intensive care unit. Mayo Clin Proc 2009;84:694-701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4065/84.8.694
Hickey JV, Strayer AL. The clinical practice of neurological and neurosurgical nursing. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins (LWW). 2019.
Olson DM, Stutzman S, Saju C, et al. Interrater Reliability of Pupillary Assessments. Neurocrit Care 2016;24:251-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-015-0182-1
Brennan PM, Murray GD, Teasdale GM. Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 1: The GCS-Pupils score: an extended index of clinical severity. J Neurosurg 2018;128:1612-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.12.JNS172780
Wijdicks EF, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV, et al. Validation of a new coma scale: The FOUR score. Ann Neurol 2005;58:585-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20611
Kornbluth J, Bhardwaj A. Evaluation of coma: a critical appraisal of popular scoring systems. Neurocrit Care 2011;14:134-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-010-9409-3
Gautam PL, Paul G, Yadav S. Comparison of FOUR Score & Glasgow Coma Scale, 1st ed. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing. 2016.
Dhollande S, Taylor A, Meyer S, Scott M. Conducting integrative reviews: a guide for novice nursing researchers. J Res Nurs 2021;26:427-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987121997907
Soares CB, Hoga LA, Peduzzi M, et al. Integrative review: concepts and methods used in nursing. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2014;48:335-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-6234201400002000020
Mishra RK, Mahajan C, Kapoor I, et al. Comparison of Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) score and the conventional scores in predicting outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage patients. Indian J Anaesth 2019;63:295-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_786_18
Wijdicks EF, Kokmen E, O'Brien PC. Measurement of impaired consciousness in the neurological intensive care unit: a new test. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;64:117-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.64.1.117
Foo CC, Loan JJM, Brennan PM. The Relationship of the FOUR Score to Patient Outcome: A Systematic Review. J Neurotrauma 2019;36:2469-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2018.6243
Bayraktar YS, Sahinoglu M, Cicekci F, et al. Comparison of Glasgow Coma Scale and Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (Four) Score: A Prospective Study. Turk Neurosurg 2019;29:285-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.24175-18.2
Wijdicks EF, Rabinstein AA, Bamlet WR, Mandrekar JN. FOUR score and Glasgow Coma Scale in predicting outcome of comatose patients: a pooled analysis. Neurology 2011;77:84-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318220ac06
Akavipat P, Sookplung P, Kaewsingha P, Maunsaiyat P. Prediction of discharge outcome with the full outline of unresponsiveness (FOUR) score in neurosurgical patients. Acta Med Okayama 2011;65:205-10.
Javvaji PK, Nagatham P, Venkata RR, et al. A Comparison of Full Outline of UnResponsiveness Score with Glasgow Coma Scale Score in Predicting Outcomes among Patients with Altered Mental Status Admitted to the Critical Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26:210-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23921
Wolf CA, Wijdicks EF, Bamlet WR, McClelland RL. Further validation of the FOUR score coma scale by intensive care nurses. Mayo Clin Proc 2007;82:435-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4065/82.4.435
Almojuela A, Hasen M, Zeiler FA. The Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) Score and Its Use in Outcome Prediction: A Scoping Systematic Review of the Adult Literature. Neurocrit Care 2019;31:162-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-018-0630-9
Temiz NC, Kose G, Tehli O, et al. A Comparison Between the Effectiveness of Full Outline of Unresponsiveness and Glasgow Coma Score at Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit Patients. Turk Neurosurg 2018;28:248-50.
Ramazani J, Hosseini M. Comparison of full outline of unresponsiveness score and Glasgow Coma Scale in Medical Intensive Care Unit. Ann Card Anaesth 2019;22:143-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_25_18
Emelifeonwu JA, Reid K, Rhodes JK, Myles L. Saved by the Pupillometer! - A role for pupillometry in the acute assessment of patients with traumatic brain injuries? Brain Inj 2018;32:675-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2018.1429021
Olson DM, Fishel M. The Use of Automated Pupillometry in Critical Care. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2016;28:101-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnc.2015.09.003
Thakur B, Nadim H, Atem F, et al. Dilation velocity is associated with Glasgow Coma Scale scores in patients with brain injury. Brain Inj 2021;35:114-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2020.1861481
Phillips SS, Mueller CM, Nogueira RG, Khalifa YM. A Systematic Review Assessing the Current State of Automated Pupillometry in the NeuroICU. Neurocrit Care 2019;31:142-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-018-0645-2
Hsu CH, Kuo LT. Application of Pupillometry in Neurocritical Patients. J Pers Med 2023;13:1100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13071100
Pansell J, Hack R, Rudberg P, et al. Can Quantitative Pupillometry be used to Screen for Elevated Intracranial Pressure? A Retrospective Cohort Study. Neurocrit Care 2022;37:531-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01518-y
Giede-Jeppe A, Sprügel MI, Huttner HB, et al. Automated Pupillometry Identifies Absence of Intracranial Pressure Elevation in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients. Neurocrit Care 2021;35:210-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01146-4
Okamoto S, Ishizawa M, Inoue S, Sakuramoto H. Use of Automated Infrared Pupillometry to Predict Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Observational Study. SAGE Open Nurs 2022;8:23779608221124417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608221124417
El Ahmadieh TY, Bedros N, Stutzman SE, et al. Automated Pupillometry as a Triage and Assessment Tool in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. World Neurosurg 2021;145:e163-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.152
Ghauri MS, Ueno A, Mohammed S, et al. Evaluating the Reliability of Neurological Pupillary Index as a Prognostic Measurement of Neurological Function in Critical Care Patients. Cureus 2022;14:e28901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28901
Romagnosi F, Bernini A, Bongiovanni F, et al. Neurological Pupil Index for the Early Prediction of Outcome in Severe Acute Brain Injury Patients. Brain Sci 2022;12:609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050609
Hoffmann M, Lefering R, Rueger JM, et al. Trauma Registry of the German Society for Trauma Surgery. Pupil evaluation in addition to Glasgow Coma Scale components in prediction of traumatic brain injury and mortality. Br J Surg 2012;99:122-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7707
Chamoun RB, Robertson CS, Gopinath SP. Outcome in patients with blunt head trauma and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 at presentation. J Neurosurg 2009;111:683-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.2.JNS08817
Couret D, Boumaza D, Grisotto C, et al. Reliability of standard pupillometry practice in neurocritical care: an observational, double-blinded study. Crit Care 2016;20:99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1239-z
Grove S, Burns N, Gray J. The Practice of Nursing Research. Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence, 7th edn. Elsevier Saunders, 2013.
Copyright (c) 2024 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Downloads
Citations
