https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2026.14835
Postoperative Rehabilitation Strategies and Facial Nerve Recovery after Cerebellopontine Angle Tumor Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 2 March 2026
Objective
Facial nerve injury remains a challenging complication of cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor surgery, often resulting in prolonged functional impairment. The present study aimed to examine the association between different postoperative rehabilitation strategies and long-term clinical and electrophysiological recovery following facial nerve reconstruction.
Methods
We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study including adult patients who underwent CPA tumor resection with intraoperatively confirmed facial nerve injury requiring reconstructive intervention between 2018 and 2023. Based on rehabilitation approaches applied in routine clinical practice, patients were classified into three groups: standard postoperative therapy, standard therapy combined with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and a multimodal rehabilitation strategy integrating TENS with targeted pharmacological support. Clinical follow-up extended to 12 months. Facial nerve function was evaluated using the House–Brackmann scale, Yanagihara system, Sunnybrook Facial Grading System, and Facial Disability Index, alongside surface and needle electromyographic parameters. Multivariable analyses were performed to account for demographic, tumor-related, surgical, and baseline functional factors.
Results
All groups demonstrated progressive improvement in facial nerve function over the follow-up period. Patients receiving rehabilitation protocols that included TENS exhibited greater improvements across clinical grading scales and electrophysiological measures compared with those receiving standard therapy alone. The multimodal rehabilitation group showed the largest magnitude of functional recovery, reflected by improved facial symmetry, voluntary movement, patient-reported physical and social function, and more favorable electromyographic patterns. These associations remained consistent after adjustment for potential confounders.
Conclusions
In this retrospective cohort, postoperative rehabilitation strategies incorporating electrical stimulation were associated with enhanced functional and electrophysiological recovery after facial nerve reconstruction. Multimodal rehabilitation approaches may offer added translational value in clinical neurorehabilitation following CPA tumor surgery. Prospective studies are warranted to further refine and validate optimized rehabilitation protocols.
Downloads
1. Çelik F, Ayyıldız A, Çiftci İnceoğlu S, Yılmaz F, Çelik M, Kuran B. Clinical and electrophysiological evaluation of electrical stimulation in patients with Bell’s palsy. Acta Med Lituanica. 2024;31(2):302-314. doi:10.15388/Amed.2024.31.2.19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/Amed.2024.31.2.19
2. Bian Z, Wang J, Fang F, et al. Study protocol for a randomized trial comparing two electroacupuncture waveforms for different severity groups of Bell palsy. Front Neurol. 2024;15:1471605. doi:10.3389/fneur.2024.1471605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1471605
3. Yoo MC, Kim JH, Kim YJ, Jung J, Kim SS, Yeo SG. Effects of electrical stimulation on facial paralysis recovery after facial nerve injury: A review on preclinical and clinical studies. J Clin Med. 2023;12(12):4133. doi:10.3390/jcm12124133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124133
4. Hajikarimloo B, Mohammadzadeh I, Nazari MA, Habibi MA, Taghipour P, Alaei SA, Khalaji A, Hashemi R, Tos SM. Prediction of facial nerve outcomes after surgery for vestibular schwannoma using machine learning-based models: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jan 24;48(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03230-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03230-9
5. Di Pietro A, Cameron M, Campana V, et al. Efficacy of adding selective electrical muscle stimulation to usual physical therapy for Bell’s palsy: Immediate and six-month outcomes. Eur J Transl Myol. 2023;33(4):11630. doi:10.4081/ejtm.2023.11630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2023.11630
6. Dagenais F, Neville C, Desmet L, Martineau S. Measuring the potential effects of mirror therapy added to the gold standard facial neuromuscular retraining in patients with chronic peripheral facial palsy: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023;12:e47709. doi:10.2196/47709 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/47709
7. Ali R, Cui H. Artificial intelligence in facial measurement: A new era of symmetry and proportions analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025;[Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1007/s00266-025-04746-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04746-7
8. Krauß J, Meincke G, Geitner M, et al. Efficacy of electrical stimulation of the zygomaticus muscle in complete facial paralysis: Evidence from facial grading and automated image analysis. Eur J Transl Myol. 2024;34(4):13161. doi:10.4081/ejtm.2024.13161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2024.13161
9. Wang H, Li Z, Liu J, et al. Three-dimensional motion capture assessment of facial mimic rehabilitation using depth camera data in patients with peripheral facial paralysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024;77(2):312-320. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2023.08.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2023.08.014
10. Tian T, Moore AM, Ghareeb PA, Boulis NM, Ward PJ. A perspective on electrical stimulation and sympathetic regeneration in peripheral nerve injuries. Neurotrauma Rep. 2024;5(1):172-180. doi:10.1089/neur.2023.0133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/neur.2023.0133
11. Tian W, Li S, Zhang Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of facial reanimation using masseteric nerve transfer in chronic facial paralysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;75(12):3696-3705. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2022.08.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2022.08.021
12. Efthimiou TN, Hernandez MP, Elsenaar A, Mehu M, Korb S. Application of facial neuromuscular electrical stimulation (fNMES) in psychophysiological research: Practical recommendations based on a systematic review of the literature. Behav Res Methods. 2024;56(4):2941-2976. doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02262-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02262-7
13. Silva MC, Oliveira MT, Azevedo-Santos IF, DeSantana JM. Effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation in the treatment of dysfunctions in facial paralysis: A systematic literature review. Braz J Phys Ther. 2022;26(6):100454. doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100454
14. Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Transcranial direct current stimulation update 2011. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29(6):463-492. doi:10.3233/RNN-2011-0618 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-2011-0618
15. Zhou J, Li Y, Zhang H, et al. Electrical stimulation therapy for orbicularis oculi dysfunction in patients with facial nerve palsy: a systematic review. J Clin Neurosci. 2024;109:68-77. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2023.11.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2023.11.010
16. Popovic MR, Sinkjaer T. Control of functional electrical stimulation systems for restoration of motor functions. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2020;28(2):299-311. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2959227
17. Gerges M, Fang ZP, Prochazka A, et al. High-frequency electrical stimulation reduces muscle fatigue during prolonged activation in humans. J Neurophysiol. 2023;129(5):1442-1452. doi:10.1152/jn.00234.2023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00234.2023
18. Luzuriaga J, Polo Y, Pastor-Alonso O, et al. Advances and perspectives in dental pulp stem cell based neuroregeneration therapies. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(7):353. doi:10.3390/ijms22073546 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073546
19. Gronthos S, Mankani M, Brahim J, Robey PG, Shi S. Postnatal human dental pulp stem cells in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(25):13625-13630. doi:10.1073/pnas.240309797 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.240309797
20. Sawada E, Yamamoto T, Kishimoto N, et al. Creating alternative afferent input to facilitate regeneration of injured primary afferent neurons. Cureus. 2025;17(2):e78708. doi:10.7759/cureus.78708 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.78708
21. Gevorkyan OV, Meliksetyan IB, Petrosyan TR, Hovsepyan AS. Bacterial melanin promotes recovery after sciatic nerve injury in rats. Neural Regen Res. 2015 Jan;10(1):124-7. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.150719.
22. Handl J, Nyvltova P, Capek J, Cesla P, Hovsepyan A, Avetisyan S, Micankova P, Bruckova L, Stankova P, Knotkova K, Petrosyan T, Rousar T. The comparison of biological effects of bacterial and synthetic melanins in neuroblastoma cells. Food Chem Toxicol. 2022 Oct;168:113355. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2022.113355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2022.113355
23. Sarkissian J, Poghosyan M, Danielyan M, Makaryan N, Petrosyan T, Avetisyan S, Hovsepyan A. Neuroprotective Effects of Bacterial Melanin in a Rotenone-Induced Parkinson's Disease Rat Model: Electrophysiological Evidence from Cortical Stimulation of Substantia Nigra Neurons. Biomedicines. 2025 May 28;13(6):1317. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13061317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13061317
24. Petrosyan TR, Chavushyan VA, Hovsepyan AS. Bacterial melanin increases electrical activity of neurons in Substantia Nigra pars compacta. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2014;121(3):259-65. doi: 10.1007/s00702-013-1095-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-013-1095-9
25. Petrosyan TR, Gevorkyan OV, Chavushyan VA, Meliksetyan IB, Hovsepyan AS, Manvelyan LR. Effects of bacterial melanin on motor recovery and regeneration after unilateral destruction of Substantia Nigra pars compacta in rats. Neuropeptides. 2014 Feb;48(1):37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.npep.2013.10.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npep.2013.10.001
26. Gevorkyan OV, Meliksetyan IB, Petrosyan TR, Hovsepyan AS. Bacterial melanin promotes recovery after sciatic nerve injury in rats. Neural Regen Res. 2015 Jan;10(1):124-7. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.150719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.150719
27. Tessa A, Simonetta A, Forcelli PA. Neuromodulation strategies to promote recovery after cranial nerve injury: translational approaches from bench to bedside. Front Neurosci. 2024;18:1345792. doi:10.3389/fnins.2024.1345792
28. Tawfik KO, Walters ZA, Kohlberg GD, Lipschitz N, Breen JT, O'Neal K, Zuccarello M, Samy RN. Impact of Motor-Evoked Potential Monitoring on Facial Nerve Outcomes after Vestibular Schwannoma Resection. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019 Jan;128(1):56-61. doi: 10.1177/0003489418803969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489418803969
29. Zachem TJ, Bello A, Lee B, Luo E, Woo J, Yoo S, Duerr E, Massat E, Hunter A, Yamamoto K, Adil SM, Kaplan S, Hachem RA, Husain AM, Codd PJ, Zomorodi A, Goodwin CR, Abdelgadir J. Current state of intraoperative neuromonitoring of the facial nerve during skull base surgery: A systematic review. J Clin Neurosci. 2025 Aug 2;140:111525. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111525
30. Abou-Al-Shaar H, Karsy M, Eli IM, Agarwal JP, Gociman B, Mahan MA. Masseter-to-facial nerve transfer for facial nerve reanimation. Neurosurg Focus Video. 2023 Jan 1;8(1):V6. doi: 10.3171/2022.9.FOCVID22107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.9.FOCVID22107
31. Zhang X, Wen H, Chen G. Incidence and Risk Factors of Delayed Facial Paralysis After Vestibular Schwannoma Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2025 May;197:123938. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123938
32. Samii M, Matthies C. Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): surgical management and results with an emphasis on complications and how to avoid them. Neurosurgery. 1997 Jan;40(1):11-21; discussion 21-3. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199701000-00002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199701000-00002
33. VanSwearingen JM, Brach JS. The Facial Disability Index: reliability and validity of a disability assessment instrument for disorders of the facial neuromuscular system. Phys Ther. 1996 Dec;76(12):1288-98; discussion 1298-300. doi: 10.1093/ptj/76.12.1288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/76.12.1288
34. Banks CA, Bhama PK, Park J, Hadlock CR, Hadlock TA. Clinician-Graded Electronic Facial Paralysis Assessment: The eFACE. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Aug;136(2):223e-230e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001447
35. Yamakami I, Ito S, Higuchi Y. Retrosigmoid removal of small acoustic neuroma: curative tumor removal with preservation of function. J Neurosurg. 2014 Sep;121(3):554-63. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.JNS132471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.6.JNS132471
36. Petrosyan T. Bacterial melanin in rat models of Parkinson's disease: a potential neuroprotective strategy. Neural Regen Res. 2015 Feb;10(2):211-2. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.152372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.152372
37. De Marco R, Froelich S, Albera A, Garbossa D, Zenga F. A systematic review on the role of the endoscope in the surgical management of cerebellopontine angle tumors: is it time to draw the conclusion? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Nov;282(11):5445-5460. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09427-4. . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09427-4
38. Yamamoto K, Kurioka T, Ohki M, Ohashi K, Harada Y, Asako Y, Sano H, Yamashita T. Immune-Nutritional Status as a Novel Prognostic Predictor of Bell's Palsy. Audiol Neurootol. 2022;27(5):418-426. doi: 10.1159/000524355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000524355
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.