Intra- and inter-tester reliability of diaphragm thickness and excursion measurements of healthy women using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging across novice examiners

Beyond respiration, the diaphragm contributes to trunk stability and posture. Rehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging (RUSI) assesses Diaphragm Thickness (DT) and Excursion (DE), but evidence on reliability across novice examiners is limited. This study investigated intra- and inter-tester reliability of diaphragmatic RUSI across novice examiners in healthy women and compared DT and DE between parous and nulliparous participants. Healthy parous and nulliparous women participated. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, chronic conditions, and BMI > 30 kg/m². Two physiotherapists, novices in RUSI, measured DT during full inspiration and expiration and DE during quiet breathing. An independent examiner calculated the Thickening Fraction (TF). Three within-session measurements were taken for intra-tester reliability, whereas, for inter-tester reliability, agreement between mean measurements was analyzed via Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs). Independent samples t-tests assessed DT and DE differences between groups. Twenty women (33±14.3 years, BMI: 23.4±3.3) participated. Intra-tester reliability was moderate to good for DT (ICC:0.511-0.691) and very good for DE (ICC:0.700-0.756). Inter-tester reliability was very good for DE (ICC=0.748), and moderate for DT (ICC: 0.573-0.706). TF reliability was poor. Only one tester found higher inspiratory DT in parous women (p<0.01). Novice examiners can reliably measure DT and DE using RUSI, supporting its use in rehabilitation. Further standardization is required to enhance RUSI practices and additional research to clarify parity-related diaphragm changes.

[1] Hodges PW, Butler JE, McKenzie DK, Gandevia SC. Contraction of the human diaphragm during rapid postural adjustments. J Physiol 1997;505:539–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1997.539bb.x

[2] Hodges PW. Is there a role for transversus abdominis in lumbo-pelvic stability? Man Ther 1999;4:74-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/math.1999.0169

[3] Hodges PW, Gandevia SC. Activation of the human diaphragm during a repetitive postural task. J Physiol 2000;522:165-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00165.xm

[4] Hodges PW, Cresswell AG, Daggfeldt K, Thorstensson A. In vivo measurement of the effect of intra-abdominal pressure on the human spine. J Biomech 2001;34:347-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00206-2

[5] Hodges PW, Sapsford R, Pengel LH. Postural and respiratory functions of the pelvic floor muscles. Neurourol Urodyn 2007;26:362-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20232

[6] Shirley D, Hodges PW, Eriksson AE, Gandevia SC. Spinal stiffness changes throughout the respiratory cycle. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2003;95:1467-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00939.2002

[7] Hodges PW, Eriksson AE, Shirley D, Gandevia SC. Intra-abdominal pressure increases stiffness of the lumbar spine. J Biomech 2005;38:1873-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.08.016

[8] Prentice CLS, Milanese S, Massy-Westropp N, Maranna S. The reliability of rehabilitative ultrasound to measure lateral abdominal muscle thickness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2021;53:102357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102357

[9] Fernández-Carnero S, Martin-Saborido C, Achalandabaso Ochoa-Ruiz de Mendoza A, et al. The role of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging technique in the lumbopelvic region as a diagnosis and treatment tool in physiotherapy: systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. J Clin Med 2021;10:5699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235699

[10] Sferrazza Papa GF, Pellegrino GM, Di Marco F, et al. A review of the ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic function in clinical practice. Respiration 2016;91:403-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000446518

[11] Papathanasiou J, Panayotov K, eds. Essentials of physical and rehabilitation medicine for undergraduate medical students. 2nd ed. Ruse, Bulgaria: Avangard Print Ltd; 2023.

[12] Takahashi Y, Morisawa T, Okamoto H, et al. Diaphragm dysfunction and ICU-acquired weakness in septic shock patients with or without mechanical ventilation: a pilot prospective observational study. J Clin Med 2023;12:5191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165191

[13] Andriopoulou M, Dimaki N, Kallistratos MS, et al. Skeletal muscle alterations and exercise intolerance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients: ultrasonography assessment of diaphragm and quadriceps. Eur J Heart Fail 2022;24:729-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.2462

[14] Maranta F, Cianfanelli L, Rizza V, et al. Diaphragm dysfunction after cardiac surgery: insights from ultrasound imaging during cardiac rehabilitation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2022;48:1179-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.02.011

[15] Shiraishi M, Higashimoto Y, Sugiya R, et al. Diaphragmatic excursion is correlated with the improvement in exercise tolerance after pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Res 2021;22:271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01870-1

[16] Altmann CH, Zvonova E, Richter L, Schüller PO. Pulmonary recovery directly after COVID-19 and in Long-COVID. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2023;315:104112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2023.104112

[17] Finta R, Nagy E, Bender T. The effect of diaphragm training on lumbar stabilizer muscles: a new concept for improving segmental stability in the case of low back pain. J Pain Res 2018;11:3031-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S181610

[18] Vicente-Campos D, Sanchez-Jorge S, Terrón-Manrique P, et al. The main role of diaphragm muscle as a mechanism of hypopressive abdominal gymnastics to improve non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med 2021;10:4983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214983

[19] Ziaeifar M, Sarrafzadeh J, Noorizadeh Dehkordi S, Arab AM, Haghighatkhah H, Zendehdel Jadehkenari A. Diaphragm thickness, thickness change, and excursion in subjects with and without nonspecific low back pain using B-mode and M-mode ultrasonography. Physiother Theory Pract 2022;38:2441-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2021.1926022

[20] Mohan V, Paungmali A, Sitilerpisan P, et al. Respiratory characteristics of individuals with non-specific low back pain: A cross-sectional study. Nurs Health Sci 2018;20:224-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12406

[21] Perez AM, Fernández-Carnero S, Sicilia-Gomez-de-Parada C, et al. Diaphragmatic activation correlated with lumbar multifidus muscles and thoracolumbar fascia by b-mode and m-mode ultrasonography in subjects with and without non-specific low back pain: a pilot study. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023;59:315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020315

[22] Calvo-Lobo C, Almazán-Polo J, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, et al. Ultrasonography comparison of diaphragm thickness and excursion between athletes with and without lumbopelvic pain. Phys Ther Sport 2019;37:128-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.03.015

[23] Kharaji G, ShahAli S, Ebrahimi Takamjani I, et al. Ultrasound assessment of the abdominal, diaphragm, and pelvic floor muscles during the respiratory and postural tasks in women with and without postpartum lumbopelvic pain: a case-control study. Int Urogynecol J 2023;34:2909-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-023-05621-2

[24] Baldwin CE, Paratz JD, Bersten AD. Diaphragm and peripheral muscle thickness on ultrasound: intra-rater reliability and variability of a methodology using non-standard recumbent positions. Respirology 2011;16:1136-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.02005.x

[25] Harper CJ, Shahgholi L, Cieslak K, et al. Variability in diaphragm motion during normal breathing, assessed with B-mode ultrasound. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2013;43:927-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2013.4931

[26] Boon AJ, Harper CJ, Ghahfarokhi LS, et al. Two-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the diaphragm: quantitative values in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve 2013;47:884-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.23702

[27] Orde SR, Boon AJ, Firth DG, Villarraga HR, Sekiguchi H. Use of angle-independent m-mode sonography for assessment of diaphragm displacement. J Ultrasound Med 2016;35:2615-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.11100

[28] Scarlata S, Mancini D, Laudisio A, Raffaele AI. Reproducibility of diaphragmatic thickness measured by M-mode ultrasonography in healthy volunteers. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2019;260:58-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2018.12.004

[29] Scarlata S, Mancini D, Laudisio A, Benigni A, Antonelli Incalzi R. Reproducibility and clinical correlates of supine diaphragmatic motion measured by m-mode ultrasonography in healthy volunteers. Respiration 2018;96:259-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000489229

[30] Nassiri K, Abedi M, Manshadi FD, et al. Comparison of the reliability of sonographic measurements of diaphragm thickness and mobility in individuals with and without pelvic girdle pain. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2019; 21:e97449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.97449

[31] Marugán-Rubio D, Chicharro JL, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, et al. Concurrent validity and reliability of manual versus specific device transcostal measurements for breathing diaphragm thickness by ultrasonography in lumbopelvic pain athletes. Sensors (Basel) 2021;21:4329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s21134329

[32] Cappellini I, Picciafuochi F, Bartolucci M, et al. Evaluation of diaphragm thickening by diaphragm ultrasonography: a reproducibility and a repeatability study. J Ultrasound 2021;24:411-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-020-00462-x

[33] Wilches-Luna EC, Pabón-Muñoz FE, Arias-Campo JM, Caballero-Lozada AF. Inter-rater reliability of the measurement of diaphragmatic excursion and fraction of diaphragmatic thickening by ultrasonography in healthy volunteers. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed) 2022;69:536-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redare.2021.06.003

[34] Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, et al. Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:96-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002

[35] Holt, GR. Declaration of Helsinki-the world’s document of conscience and responsibility. South Med J 2014;107:407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000131

[36] Boussuges A, Rives S, Finance J, Brégeon F. Assessment of diaphragmatic function by ultrasonography: Current approach and perspectives. World J Clin Cases 2020;8:2408-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i12.2408

[37] Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016;15:155-63. Erratum in: J Chiropr Med 2017;16:346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2017.10.001

[38] Hallgren KA. computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 2012;8:23-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023

[39] Whittaker JL, Ellis R, Hodges PW, et al. Imaging with ultrasound in physical therapy: What is the PT's scope of practice? A competency-based educational model and training recommendations. Br J Sports Med 2019;53:1447-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-100193

[40] Janssens L, McConnell AK, Pijnenburg M, et al. Inspiratory muscle training affects proprioceptive use and low back pain. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2015;47:12-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000385

[41] Ahmadnezhad L, Yalfani A, Gholami Borujeni B. Inspiratory muscle training in rehabilitation of low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Sport Rehabil 2020;29:1151-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2019-0231

[42] O'Sullivan PB, Beales DJ. Changes in pelvic floor and diaphragm kinematics and respiratory patterns in subjects with sacroiliac joint pain following a motor learning intervention: a case series. Man Ther 2007;12:209-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2006.06.006

[43] Dülger E, Bilgin S, Bulut E, et al. The effect of stabilization exercises on diaphragm muscle thickness and movement in women with low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2018;31:323-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-169749