How new methodological approaches in the study of activity markers and nonmetric skeletal traits can help in the anthropological definition of commingled inhumations

Classical bioanthropology analyzes skeletal markers to interpret the demography, health, and lifestyle of ancient populations. However, this becomes challenging when remains are poorly preserved or commingled. Nevertheless, it is possible to identify markers that help interpret population aspects. For this purpose, we propose using nonmetric traits of the lower limbs as indicators of habitual posture and functional adaptation to occupational activities. Our study analyzed two Sicanian populations from Sicily: Ponte della Paolina (Late Bronze Age) and Baucina (7th– 5th centuries BCE). Morphological traits were recorded on adult lower limb bones, including Poirier’s facet, vastus notch, and accessory articular facets. Frequencies were calculated by bone and side, and statistical association tests (Fisher’s Exact and Chisquare) were applied to assess inter- and intra-population variation. Patterns consistent with prolonged crouching and foot dorsiflexion at Ponte della Paolina were found through functional analysis of trait combinations. Baucina individuals exhibited similar patterns, alongside traits suggesting more dynamic activity, such as walking on uneven terrain. The study emphasizes how useful nonmetric traits are for reconstructing postural adaptations and habitual behaviors in past populations.

1. Ossenberg NS. Discontinuous morphological variation in the human cranium. PhD thesis. Toronto: University of Toronto; 1969.

2. Rightmire GP. Cranial measurements and discrete traits compared in distance studies of African Negro skulls. Hum Biol 1972;44:263-76.

3. Berry RJ, Searle AG. Epigenetic polymorphism of the rodent skeleton. Proc Zool Soc Lond 1963;140:577-615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1963.tb01990.x

4. Saunders SR. Nonmetric skeletal variation. In: Iscan MY, Kennedy KAR, eds. Reconstruction of life from the skeleton. New York, NY: Alan R. Liss; 1989. pp 95-8.

5. Mann RW, Hunt DR. Non-metric traits and anatomical variants that can mimic trauma in the human skeleton. Forensic Sci Int 2019;301:202-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.039

6. Cockerill SJ, Alberto-Barroso V, Arnay-De-La-Rosa M, González-Reimers E. Intracemetery relationships: Non-metric trait combination analysis of Maspalomas of Gran Canaria (Canary Islands, Spain). Anthropol Anz 2024;81:433-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1127/anthranz/2024/1785

7. Grüneberg H. Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse: IV. Quasi-continuous variations. J Genet 1952;51:95-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02986708

8. Falconer DS. The inheritance of liability to certain diseases, estimated from the incidence among relatives. Ann Hum Genet 1965;29:51-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1965.tb00500.x

9. Palamenghi A, Gibelli D, Mazzarelli D, et al. Rumor has it: a narrative review on the use of skeletal non-metric traits and variants for personal identification. Leg Med 2023;65:1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2023.102316

10. Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH. Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Arkansas Archaeological Survey Research Series No. 44. Fayetteville: Arkansas Archaeological Survey; 1994.

11. White TD, Folkens PA. The human bone manual. Elsevier; 2005.

12. Procelli E. Il complesso tombale di contrada Paolina ed il problema dei rapporti tra Sicilia e Malta nella prima Età del Bronzo [The tomb complex of Contrada Paolina and the problem of relations between Sicily and Malta in the Early Bronze Age]. Bollettino d’Arte 1981;9:83-110.

13. Albanese Procelli RM. Sicani, Siculi, Elimi: forme di identità, modi di contatto e processi di trasformazione [Sicans, Sicels, Elymians: forms of identity, modes of contact, and processes of transformation]. Milano: Longanesi; 2003.

14. Crispino A, Cultraro M. Sepolture anomale e mutilazioni rituali [Anomalous burials and ritual mutilations]. In: Bérard RM, ed. Il diritto alla sepoltura nel Mediterraneo antico. Rome: Publications de l’École française de Rome; 2021. pp 247-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.efr.13218

15. Bordonaro G. Carta Archeologica e Sistema Informativo Territoriale del Comune di Baucina [Archaeological Map and Territorial Information System of the Municipality of Baucina]. Palermo: Università di Palermo, Dipartimento di Beni Culturali; 2011.

16. Belvedere O, Burgio A, Bordonaro G, Forgia V. Baucina – Monte Falcone 2017: indagini nella necropoli [Baucina – Monte Falcone 2017: investigations in the necropolis]. Fasti online 2017. Available from: http://www.fastionline.org/docs/FOLDER-it-2017-380

17. Belvedere O, Burgio A. Landscape dynamics and cultural contacts in the territory of Himera in the Archaic period. In: Colombi C, Parisi V, Dally O, et al. eds. Comparing Greek Colonies: Mobility and Settlement Consolidation from Southern Italy to the Black Sea (8th-6th century BC). Proceedings of the International Conference, 2018 Nov 7-9. Berlin: De Gruyter; 2022. pp. 304-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110752151-020

18. Mariotti V, Facchini F, Belcastro MG. The study of entheses: proposal of a standardised scoring method for twenty-three entheses of the postcranial skeleton. Coll Antropol 2007;31:291-313.

19. Poirier P, Charpy A. Traité d’anatomie humaine [Treatise on human anatomy]. Paris: Masson; 1911.

20. Finnegan M. Non-metric variation of the infracranial skeleton. J Anat 1978;125:23-37.

21. Lawrence AB, Sandberg PA, Van Gerven DP, Sponheimer M. Evidence for differences in activity between socioeconomic groups at Kulubnarti, Nubia (550–800 CE), from osseous modifications of the proximal femur. Int J Osteoarchaeol 2018;28:735-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.2699

22. Odgers PNB. Two details about the neck of the femur: (1) The eminentia; (2) The empreinte. J Anat 1931;65:352-63.

23. Kostick EL. Facets and imprints on the upper and lower extremities of femora from a Western Nigerian population. J Anat 1963;97:393-402.

24. Angel JL. The reaction area of the femoral neck. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1964;32:130-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-196400320-00022

25. Pálfi G, Dutour O. Activity-induced skeletal markers in historical anthropological material. Int J Anthropol 1996;11:41-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02442202

26. Villotte S, Knüsel CJ. Some remarks about femoroacetabular impingement and osseous non-metric variations of the proximal femur. Bull Mém Soc Anthropol Paris 2009;21:95-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/bmsap.6495

27. Radi N, Mariotti V, Riga A, et al. Variation of the anterior aspect of the femoral head‐neck junction in a modern human identified skeletal collection. Am J Phys Anthropol 2013;152:261-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22354

28. Charles RH. The influence of function, as exemplified in the morphology of the lower extremity of the Panjabi. J Anat Physiol 1893;28:1-18.

29. Molleson T, Blondiaux J. Riders' bones from Kish, Iraq. Camb Archaeol J 1994;4:312-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S095977430000113X

30. Larsen CS. Bioarchaeology: interpreting behavior from the human skeleton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.

31. Trinkaus E. Squatting among the Neandertals: a problem in the behavioral interpretation of skeletal morphology. J Archaeol Sci 1975;2:327-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-4403(75)90005-9

32. Messeri P. Morfologia della rotula nei neolitici della Liguria [Patellar morphology in the Neolithic populations of Liguria]. Archivio per l’Antropologia e la Etnologia 1961;91:1-11.

33. Anderson T. A bipartite patella in a juvenile from a medieval context. Int J Osteoarchaeol 2002;12:297-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.600

34. Molleson T. The ordinary neolithic people of Abu Hureyra. In: Lillios KT, Chazan M, eds. Fresh fields and pastures new: Papers presented in honor of Andrew MT Moore. Leiden: Sidestone Press; 2016. pp. 187-95.

35. Kriletić B, Vuković M, Carić M. A case of bipartite patella and vastus notch from Kneževići hillfort–Malo Libinje, Croatia. J Bioanthropol 2021;1:81-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54062/jb.1.1.6

36. Mann RW, Hunt DR. Photographic regional atlas of bone disease: A guide to pathologic and normal variation in the human skeleton. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher LTD; 2005.

37. Thomson A. The influence of posture on the form of the articular surfaces of the tibia and astragalus in the different races of man and the higher apes. J Anat Physiol 1889;23:616-39.

38. Barnett CH. Squatting facets on the European talus. J Anat 1954;88:509-13.

39. Kirkpatrick J, Yassaie O, Mirjalili SA. The plantar calcaneal spur: a review of anatomy, histology, etiology and key associations. J Anat 2017;230:743-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12607

40. Spatafora F. Per un’archeologia degli incontri: Sicani ed Elimi nella Sicilia greca [For an archaeology of encounters: Sicans and Elymians in Greek Sicily]. In : Tréziny H, ed. Grecs et indigènes de la Catalogne à la mer Noire. Aix-en-Provence : Publications du Centre Camille Jullian; 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pccj.197