Comparison of different methods to overexpress large genes


Submitted: December 21, 2017
Accepted: June 28, 2018
Published: October 26, 2018
Abstract Views: 2079
PDF: 687
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Aline Lisie Ramos Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medical Science, Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Campinas/Hemocentro-UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Fernanda Soares Niemann Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medical Science, Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Campinas/Hemocentro-UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Adriana Silva Santos Duarte Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medical Science, Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Campinas/Hemocentro-UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Karla Priscila Ferro Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medical Science, Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Campinas/Hemocentro-UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Irene Santos Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medical Science, Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Campinas/Hemocentro-UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Carolina Louzão Bigarella Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medical Science, Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Campinas/Hemocentro-UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Antonio Filareto Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States.
  • Sara Teresinha Olalla Saad Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medical Science, Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Campinas/Hemocentro-UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gain-of-function of very large transgene constructs can lead to genetic perturbations, providing researchers with the alternative of a powerful tool to identify pathway components which remain undetected when using traditional loss-of-function analysis. To promote longer-term expression, various systems for transgene integration have been developed, however large cDNA sequences are often difficult to clone into size-limited expression vectors. We attempted to overexpress ARHGAP21, a 5.874 kb gene, using different methodologies as plasmid, lentiviral and Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon based gene transfer. Using lentiviral based transduction; an enormous amount of lentiviral supernatant was produced to obtain a satisfactory titration after double ultracentrifugation. However, U937 transduced cells showed only 50% of gene expression increase, which vanished after 5 days. SB transposon system application to overexpress ARHGAP21 was a complete success. Nucleofecting SB-based vector plus SB100x transposase vector resulted in an expressive increase of gene and protein expression. Furthermore, the overexpression was maintained even after freezing and thawing processes. In conclusion, our work shows that the SB transposon system is the best choice for those seeking a stable and high gene expression. Once the overexpression is achieved, freezing cells and using them for a long time becomes possible.

Supporting Agencies

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Ramos, A. L., Niemann, F. S., Duarte, A. S. S., Ferro, K. P., Santos, I., Bigarella, C. L., Filareto, A., & Olalla Saad, S. T. (2018). Comparison of different methods to overexpress large genes. Journal of Biological Research - Bollettino Della Società Italiana Di Biologia Sperimentale, 91(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/jbr.2018.7249

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations