Uses of simulation during COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review

Submitted: 9 July 2024
Accepted: 21 September 2024
Published: 15 October 2024
Abstract Views: 2295
PDF: 184
Supplementary Materials: 152
Dataset: 177
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Abstract

Background: Some experts have made suggestions on how to use simulation during the pandemic, and simulation activities were carried out observing COVID-19 restrictions to improve technical and non-technical skills in health professionals. A number of papers have been published detailing the use of simulation during this period, but it is not clear for this reason, through a retrospective literature review, we analyzed studies published during the pandemic period to assess how simulation was used during this historical period.

Methods: Retrospective literature review.

Results: The search generated 11,375 records. After removing duplicates, 5431 studies were screened. Of the 643 eligible full-texts, 221 were excluded. A total of 422 articles met the inclusion criteria. Half of the 422 included studies were carried out specifically for COVID-19 (211), while 152 (36%) were performed during the pandemic but for other reasons. Analysis showed that simulation was used during the pandemic, with clear educational and research objectives. Most of the included studies dealt with COVID-19, focusing on high-acuity and critical scenarios but also including technical and non-technical skills.

Conclusion: The experience gained with both “COVID-related” and “During COVID” studies could be applied to other settings in case of urgent training needed in case of disasters and to tailor simulation courses to retain technical skills.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

El Bcheraoui C, Weishaar H, Pozo-Martin F, Hanefeld J. Assessing COVID-19 through the lens of health systems’ preparedness: time for a change. Glob Health 2020;16:112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00645-5
Koenig KL, Lim HCS, Tsai SH. Crisis standard of care: refocusing health care goals during catastrophic disasters and emergencies. J Exp Clin Med 2011;3:159–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecm.2011.06.003
Hick JL, Einav S, Hanfling D, et al. Surge capacity principles: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement. Chest 2014;146:e1S-e16S. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.14-0733
Arabi YM, Murthy S, Webb S. COVID-19: a novel coronavirus and a novel challenge for critical care. Intensive Care Med 2020;46:833–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-05955-1
Madad S, Moskovitz J, Boyce MR, et al. Ready or not, patients will present: improving urban pandemic preparedness. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2021;15:267–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.7
Ingrassia PL, Ferrari M, Paganini M, Mormando G. Role of health simulation centres in the COVID-19 pandemic response in Italy: a national study. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn 2021;7:379–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000813
Dieckmann P, Torgeirsen K, Qvindesland SA, et al. The use of simulation to prepare and improve responses to infectious disease outbreaks like COVID-19: practical tips and resources from Norway, Denmark, and the UK. Adv Simul 2020;5:3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-020-00121-5
Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, et al. Chapter 11: Scoping reviews - JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis - JBI Global Wiki. Accessed: 2 August 2023]; Available from: https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL/4687342/Chapter+11%3A+Scoping+reviews DOI: https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-24-09
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA Extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018;169:467–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
World Bank Country and Lending Groups – World Bank Data Help Desk [Internet]. Aceesed: 8 October 2022. Avallabile from: https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups
Chiniara G, Cole G, Brisbin K, et al. Simulation in healthcare: a taxonomy and a conceptual framework for instructional design and media selection. Med Teach 2013;35:e1380-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.733451
Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, et al Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005;27:10–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500046924
Martinerie L, Rasoaherinomenjanahary F, Ronot M, et al. Health care simulation in developing countries and low-resource situations. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2018;38:205–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000211
Schmidt E, Goldhaber-Fiebert SN, Ho LA, McDonald KM. Simulation exercises as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:426–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00010
Coyle M, Martin D, McCutcheon K. Interprofessional simulation training in difficult airway management: a narrative review. Br J Nurs Mark Allen Publ 2020;29:36–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2020.29.1.36
George KL, Quatrara B. Interprofessional simulations promote knowledge retention and enhance perceptions of teamwork skills in a surgical-trauma-burn intensive care unit setting. Dimens Crit Care Nurs DCCN 2018;37:144–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000301
Ragazzoni L, Ingrassia PL, Echeverri L, et al. Virtual reality simulation training for ebola deployment. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2015;9:543–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2015.36
Martin A, Cross S, Attoe C. The use of in situ simulation in healthcare education: current perspectives. Adv Med Educ Pract 2020;11:893–903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S188258
Mak MY, Choi YF, Leung N. Learning experience and clinical outcomes with standardized patient simulation: a mixed qualitative and quantitative study. J Community Health Nurs 2022;39:193–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370016.2022.2058876
Paganini M, Barbiellini Amidei C, Valastro MF, et al. Adult emergency department visits during the COVID-19 pandemic in Veneto region, Italy: a time-trend Analysis. Intern Emerg Med 2022;17:285–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-021-02815-8
Izard SG, Juanes JA, García Peñalvo FJ, et al. Virtual reality as an educational and training tool for medicine. J Med Syst 2018;42:50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-0900-2

How to Cite

Mormando, G., Costantini, I., Paganini, M., Vittadello, A., Pinello, C., Tiozzo, G., Giglia, M., Frigo, M., Pons, S., Savino, S., Navalesi, P., & Ingrassia, P. L. (2024). Uses of simulation during COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. Emergency Care Journal. https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2024.12795