https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2026.15253
Does physical therapist contact matter? A randomised controlled trial comparing telerehabilitation and booklet-based exercise for knee osteoarthritis
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 25 May 2026
Telerehabilitation is increasingly used in knee osteoarthritis, but its effectiveness compared with structured home exercise and the role of physical therapist contact remain unclear. To address this, we aimed to investigate whether the clinical effectiveness of telerehabilitation for knee osteoarthritis is primarily attributable to the digital platform itself or to the extent and quality of physical therapist engagement within that platform. In this single-centre Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT), 118 patients with knee OA (Kellgren–Lawrence grade I–III) were allocated 1:1 to a 12-week telerehabilitation (TR; n=57) or booklet-based exercise programme (BB; n=61). Within the telerehabilitation group, participants were retrospectively stratified into those with Physical Therapist Contact (TR‑C) and those without contact (TR‑NC) for an exploratory analysis. Outcomes included knee pain (NRS, Numerical Rating Scale), Range Of Motion (ROM), WOMAC, physical activity (IPAQ), and health-related quality of life (SF-12). A post-hoc exploratory subgroup analysis was conducted and looked at the impact of a physical therapist with and without contact. A key component of the analysis was an exploratory subgroup comparison examining the role of physical therapist contact within the telerehabilitation group. Primary outcomes were analysed using mixed-model ANOVA, with exploratory subgroup comparisons. Both groups showed significant within-group improvements in pain, ROM, and WOMAC scores (all p ≤ 0.001), with no significant group × time interactions (p > 0.05). Exploratory analysis identified significant differences based on physical therapist contact, with greater improvements in pain (p = 0.009), knee flexion (p = 0.041), and WOMAC Pain (p = 0.047) among participants who engaged with the physical therapist. Participants without contact showed the smallest improvements. When stratified by physical therapist contact, participants receiving contact demonstrated greater improvements than those without contact, who showed the smallest gains. Telerehabilitation and booklet-based exercise programme provide comparable clinical outcomes at the group level. However, physical therapist engagement appears to be a key determinant of treatment response. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of TR depends more on clinical interaction than on digital delivery alone. Physical therapist contact may represent an important component influencing the effectiveness of telerehabilitation. It remains unclear whether telerehabilitation effectiveness stems from the digital platform, exercise content, or physical therapist guidance.
Downloads
[1] Cui A, Li H, Wang D, et al. Global, regional prevalence, incidence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in population-based studies. EClinicalMedicine 2020;29-30:100587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100587
[2] Smith KM, Massey BJ, Young JL, Rhon DI. What are the unsupervised exercise adherence rates in clinical trials for knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review. Braz J Phys Ther 2023;27:100532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2023.100533
[3] Mishra S, Gosling J, Laplante-Lévesque A, et al. The need for rehabilitation services in the WHO European Region is substantial and growing. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2023;24:100550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100550
[4] Albreht T, Polin K, Pribakovič Brinovec R, et al. Slovenia: health system review 2021. Health Syst Transit 2021;23:1-183.
[5] Poldrugovac M, Kuhar M, Kasapinov B. Regional inequalities in waiting times: analysis of orthopedic appointments in Slovenia. Eur J Public Health 2024;34:ckae144.2145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.2145
[6] Krištof Mirt P, Erjavec K, Krsnik S, et al. Patients' expectations for app-based therapy in knee osteoarthritis: user-centered design approach. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2025;12:e64607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/64607
[7] Xiang W, Wang JY, Ji BJ, et al. Effectiveness of different telerehabilitation strategies on pain and physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e40735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/40735
[8] Farì G, Quarta F, Bressi F, et al. Effects of exercise-based telerehabilitation for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and a study protocol. Bioengineering (Basel) 2026;13:136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13020136
[9] Gohir SA, Eek F, Kelly A, et al. Effectiveness of internet-based exercises aimed at treating knee osteoarthritis: the iBEAT-OA randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e210012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0012
[10] Azma K, Soltani ZR, Rezaeimoghaddam F, et al. Efficacy of telerehabilitation compared with office-based physical therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized clinical trial. J Telemed Telecare 2018;24:560-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X17723368
[11] Moutzouri M, Koumantakis GA, Hurley M, et al. Effectiveness of a web-guided self-managed telerehabilitation program enhanced with outdoor physical activity on physical function, physical activity levels and pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med 2024;13:934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13040934
[12] Tümtürk İ, Bakırhan S, Özden F, et al. Effect of telerehabilitation-based exercise and education on pain, function, strength, proprioception, and psychosocial parameters in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2024;103:222-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002335
[13] Brosseau L, Balmer S, Tousignant M, et al. Intra- and intertester reliability and criterion validity of the parallelogram and universal goniometers for measuring maximum active knee flexion and extension of patients with knee restrictions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:396-402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.19250
[14] Pak SS, Janela D, Freitas N, et al. Comparing Digital to Conventional Physical Therapy for Chronic Shoulder Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e49236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/49236
[15] Muñoz-Tomás MT, Burillo-Lafuente M, Vicente-Parra A, et al. Telerehabilitation as a Therapeutic Exercise Tool versus Face-to-Face Physiotherapy: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023;20:4358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054358
[16] Lang S, McLelland C, MacDonald D, Hamilton DF. Do digital interventions increase adherence to home exercise rehabilitation? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Arch Physiother 2022;12:24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-022-00148-z
[17] Hopewell S, Chan A-W, Collins GS, et al. CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials. BM. 2025;389:e081123.
[18] Dantas LO, Salvini TDF, McAlindon TE. Knee osteoarthritis: key treatments and implications for physical therapy. Braz J Phys Ther 2020;25:135-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.08.004
[19] Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:1381-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB
[20] Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34:220-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003
[21] Kotnik P, Erjavec K. Opinions on remote treatment programs for patients with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review. Open Access Macedonian J Med Sci 2023;11:196–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2023.11826
[22] Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 2009;41:1149-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
[23] Hinman RS, Campbell PK, Lawford BJ, et al. Does telephone-delivered exercise advice and support by physiotherapists improve pain and/or function in people with knee osteoarthritis? Telecare randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med 2020;54:790-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-101183
[24] Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
[25] Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, et al. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001;94:149-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9
[26] Silva MDC, Woodward AP, Fearon AM, et al. Minimal clinically important change of knee flexion in people with knee osteoarthritis after non-surgical interventions using a meta-analytical approach. Syst Rev 2024;13:50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02393-0
[27] Ehrich EW, Davies GM, Watson DJ, et al. Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire and global assessments in patients with osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 2000;27:2635-41.
[28] Latif-Zade T, Tucci B, Verbovetskaya D, et al. Systematic review shows telerehabilitation might achieve comparable results to office-based rehabilitation for decreasing pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Medicina (Kaunas) 2021;57:764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57080764
[29] Mapinduzi J, Ndacayisaba G, Mitchaï PM, et al. Supervised or home-based? Exploring the best exercise approach for knee osteoarthritis management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 2025;14:525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14020525
[30] Marriott KA, Hall M, Maciukiewicz JM, et al. The control group matters: pain, physical function and strength improvements relative to the comparator intervention in knee and hip osteoarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2024;68:152538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152538
[31] Lawford BJ, Bennell KL, Campbell PK, et al. Association between therapeutic alliance and outcomes following telephone-delivered exercise by a physical therapist for people with knee osteoarthritis: secondary analyses from a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2021;8:e23386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/23386
[32] Bargeri S, Castellini G, Vitale JA, et al. Effectiveness of telemedicine for musculoskeletal disorders: umbrella review. J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e50090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/50090
[33] Bhardwaj A, Walsh CB, Ezzat A, et al. Patient and clinician perspectives of online-delivered exercise programmes for chronic musculoskeletal conditions: a mixed-methods systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2024;46:2196-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2224085
[34] Molina-Garcia P, Mora-Traverso M, Prieto-Moreno R, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2024;67:101791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2023.101791
CRediT authorship contribution
Petra Kotnik, conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data curation, formal analysis, writing – original draft, writing – review & editing, project administration; Mohsen Hussein, conceptualization, resources, investigation, writing – review & editing, supervision.
Supporting Agencies
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.