https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2026.14704
Clinical efficacy of ramp lesion treatment: a systematic review and meta analysis study
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 17 June 2026
Ramp lesions, tears involving the peripheral attachment of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus, significantly impact knee stability and function, particularly in association with anterior cruciate ligament injuries. However, evidence regarding optimal treatment strategies remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of various treatment modalities for ramp lesions. A comprehensive systematic search was conducted across major electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, up to June 2025. Studies were included based on predefined eligibility criteria. Data extraction was performed and meta-analytic synthesis was conducted using random-effects models. A total of 17 studies met inclusion criteria. The pooled mean difference demonstrated significant improvements in both IKDC (MD=28.5 points; 95% CI: 27.9–29.2) and Lysholm scores (MD=28.5 points; 95% CI: 27.9–29.2). Subgroup analyses revealed notable effectiveness for AIR compared to CM and PM, with statistically significant subgroup differences (p<0.05). The overall treatment success rate was 87% (95% CI: 83–92%). Across techniques, patient-reported outcomes improved markedly (IKDC fixed-effect pooled Mean Difference [MD] 28.8 points, 95% CI 28.2–29.4; random-effects overall effect significant; I²=98%). In anterior vs posterior all-inside subgroups, IKDC showed no robust between-approach difference on the random-effects test (χ²=0.51, p=.48), with a small fixed-effect difference (χ²=4.34, p=.04). Lysholm scores also improved substantially (fixed-effect pooled MD 28.0 points, 95% CI 27.3–28.7), and the between-approach difference was significant, favoring the posterior subgroup on the fixed-effect model. The pooled clinical success proportion was 90% without a significant difference between approaches (p=.10). The findings indicate that surgical interventions, particularly All-inside repair has effectively improved knee function and patient-reported outcomes following ramp lesions compared to conservative management and partial meniscectomy. However, no significant difference was detected between anterior and posterior all-inside repair techniques.
Downloads
1. Rayes J, Duffy P, Martin CR. Reverse ramp lesion repair in patients with meniscotibial ligament avulsion injury: the hidden AMRI. Arthrosc Tech 2024;13:102930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2024.102930
2. Sun L, Yan S, Ji T, Shu H. Meniscotibial ligament repair of a ramp lesion of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Arthrosc Tech 2024;13:103046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2024.103046
3. Pimprikar MV, Patil HG. Technique for medial meniscus ramp repair: an anatomic approach. Arthrosc Tech 2024;13:103018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2024.103018
4. Pioger C, Ayata M, Pettinari F, et al. Secondary meniscectomy rates and risk factors for failed repair of ramp lesions performed at the time of primary ACL reconstruction: an analysis of 1037 patients from the SANTI Study Group. Am J Sports Med 2024;52:1944–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241253841
5. Ito R, Watanabe S, Sakamoto T, et al. Medial meniscal extrusion after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) associated with meniscal repair and preoperative extrusion. Cureus 2024;16:e69987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.69987
6. Moran J, LaPrade CM, LaPrade RF. Inside-out repair of medial meniscal ramp lesions in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 2024;14(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00037
7. Vittone G, Mouton C, Valcarenghi J, et al. Meniscal ramp repair: double-row anatomic repair in acute anterior cruciate ligament tears. Arthrosc Tech 2023;12:e1535–e40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2023.04.027
8. Glover MA, Mason TW, Albertson BS, et al. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft and concomitant meniscal ramp repair. Video J Sports Med 2024;4:26350254231184905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254231184905
9. Gómez Cáceres A, Mariño IT, Martínez Malo FJ, et al. Meniscal Ramp lesion repair without the need for a posteromedial portal. Arthrosc Tech 2024;13:102902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2023.102902
10. Louis ML, Favreau H, Maroteau G, et al. The frequency of medial meniscal repairs in stable knees during one year of arthroscopic activity (2021-2022) - comparison with a retrospective study (prior to 2017). Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2023;109:103676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103676
11. Miyamoto K, Kurokouchi K, Ishizuka S, et al. Arthroscopic all-suture anchor technique for unstable ramp lesions with medial meniscal defects. Arthrosc Tech 2023;12:e1837–e42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2023.06.015
12. Neto JBA, Cardoso AB, Munhoz GS, et al. Medial meniscotibial ligament of the knee: a step by-step dissection. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2023;58:e755–e9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1776137
13. Kim YS, Koo S, Kim JH, et al. Greater knee rotatory instability after posterior meniscocapsular injury versus anterolateral ligament injury: a proposed mechanism of high-grade pivot shift. Orthop J Sports Med 2023;11:23259671231188712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671231188712
14. LaPrade CM, Homan MD, Moran J, et al. Concurrent repair of medial meniscal ramp lesions and lateral meniscus root tears in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the "new terrible triad". Arthrosc Tech 2023;12:e1565–e78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2023.04.028
15. Li S, Qin Y, Wang H, et al. Repair of ramp lesions of the medial meniscus with acl reconstruction can better restore knee stability: a cadaveric study. Orthop J Sports Med 2023;11:23259671221140120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671221140120
16. Furumatsu T, Miyazawa S, Tanaka T, et al. Postoperative change in medial meniscal length in concurrent all-inside meniscus repair with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop 2014;38:1393–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2238-1
17. Thaunat M, Jan N, Fayard JM, et al. Repair of meniscal ramp lesions through a posteromedial portal during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: outcome study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 2016;32:2269–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.02.026
18. Keyhani S, Ahn JH, Verdonk R, et al. Arthroscopic all-inside ramp lesion repair using the posterolateral transseptal portal view. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017;25:454–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4410-9
19. Liu X, Zhang H, Feng H, et al. Is it necessary to repair stable ramp lesions of the medial meniscus during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(5):1004–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516682493
20. Yang J, Guan K, Wang JZ. Clinical study on the arthroscopic refreshing treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury combined with stable medial meniscus ramp injury. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2017;17:108–13.
21. Chen Z, Li WP, Yang R, et al. Meniscal ramp lesion repair using the fast-fix technique: evaluating healing and patient outcomes with second-look arthroscopy. J Knee Surg 2018;31:710–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1606378
22. Balazs GC, Greditzer HGt, Wang D, et al. Non-treatment of stable ramp lesions does not degrade clinical outcomes in the setting of primary ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020;28:3576–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06017-1
23. DePhillipo NN, Dornan GJ, Dekker TJ, et al. Clinical Characteristics and outcomes after primary ACL reconstruction and meniscus ramp repair. Orthop J Sports Med 2020;8:2325967120912427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967120912427
24. Hatayama K, Terauchi M, Saito K, et al. Healing status of meniscal ramp lesion affects anterior knee stability after ACL reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 2020;8:2325967120917674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967120917674
25. Albayrak K, Buyukkuscu MO, Kurk MB, et al. Leaving the stable ramp lesion unrepaired does not negatively affect clinical and functional outcomes as well as return to sports rates after ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021;29:3773–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06402-w
26. Jiang J, Ni L, Chen J. Isolated meniscal ramp lesion without obvious anterior cruicate ligament rupture. Orthop Surg 2021;13:402–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12860
27. Karaca MO, Özbek EA, Ertan MB, et al. Short-term outcomes after treatment of isolated hidden meniscal ramp lesions. Orthop J Sports Med 2022;10:23259671221085977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671221085977
28. Thaunat M, Foissey C, Ingale P, et al. Survival and risk factor analysis of arthroscopic ramp lesion repair during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2022;50:637–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465211068524
29. Tanel L, Thaunat M, Lambrey PJ, et al. Survivorship and outcomes of meniscal ramp lesions repaired through a posteromedial portal during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: outcome study with a minimum 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2024;52:3206–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241288233
30. Clemente A, Zaccari D, Verdone F, et al. All-inside ramp lesion repair via anterior portals and pie-crusting: Excellent outcomes and survivorship at one-year follow-up. J Orthop 2025;70:113–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2025.03.014
31. Ishibashi HK, Sasaki E, Chiba D, et al. Effect of ramp lesions on outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 2025;13:23259671241308015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241308015
32. Screpis D, Qordja F, De Berardinis L, et al. Saving the meniscus: a retrospective observational study of the incidence, treatment, and failure rate of the main meniscal tear types at 24-month follow-up. J Clin Med 2025;14(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103350
33. Schweizer C, Hanreich C, Tscholl PM, et al. Nineteen percent of meniscus repairs are being revised and failures frequently occur after the second postoperative year: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022;30:2267–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06770-x
34. Gilat R, Mitchnik IY, Mimouni T, et al. The meniscotibial ligament role in meniscal extrusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023;143:5777–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04934-7
35. Marin F, Soto J, Barahona M, Negrin R. Searching for the best treatment for ramp lesions: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cureus 2023;15:e41651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41651
36. Farinelli L, Meena A, Montini D, et al. Failure rate of isolated medial meniscus repair in the stable knee: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2025;33:1333–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12441
37. Familiari F, Tollefson LV, Izzo A, et al. High-grade medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau bone bruises predict ramp lesions of the medial meniscus in patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears: A prospective clinical and MRI evaluation. J Exp Orthop 2025;12:e70238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.70238
38. Fukushima H, Kato J, Hanaki S, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees with meniscal ramp lesions manifest greater anteroposterior and rotatory instability compared with isolated anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees. Arthroscopy 2025;41:716–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.04.009
39. Sonnery-Cottet B, Praz C, Rosenstiel N, et al. Epidemiological evaluation of meniscal ramp lesions in 3214 anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees from the SANTI Study Group database: a risk factor analysis and study of secondary meniscectomy rates following 769 ramp repairs. Am J Sports Med 2018;46:3189–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518800717
40. Balazs GC, Greditzer HGt, Wang D, et al. Ramp lesions of the medial meniscus in patients undergoing primary and revision ACL reconstruction: prevalence and risk factors. Orthop J Sports Med 2019;7:2325967119843509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967119843509
41. Servant C. Editorial commentary: medial meniscal ramp tears require comprehensive evaluation and treatment. Arthroscopy. 2025;41:4112-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.04.038
42. Tollefson LV, Tapasvi S, Seil R, et al. Medial meniscal ramp tears in patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears undergoing reconstruction: a surgically relevant classification system based on tear morphology. Arthroscopy 2025;41:4103-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.03.015
43. Brophy RH, Steinmetz RG, Smith MV, Matava MJ. Meniscal ramp lesions: anatomy, epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022;30:255–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00091
44. Laurens M, Cavaignac E, Fayolle H, et al. The accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of ramp lesions. Skeletal Radiol 2022;51:525–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03858-w
45. Pires D, Monteiro L, Rocha de Faria JL, et al. Diagnosis by manual maneuver of medial meniscus ramp lesions. Arthrosc Tech 2023;12:e959–e64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2023.02.033
46. D'Ambrosi R, Meena A, Raj A, et al. Good results after treatment of RAMP lesions in association with ACL reconstruction: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023;31:358–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07067-3
47. Keyhani S, Mirahmadi A, Maleki A, et al. Approaching ramp lesions from the different world of posterior knee compartment: A review of evidence with a proposal of a new classification and treatment. J Exp Orthop 2024;11:e70018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.70018
48. Misir A, Yuce A. The fate of unrepaired stable ramp lesions: a systematic review. Acta Orthop Belg 2024;90:543–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52628/90.3.11174
49. Dansuk E, Kemah B, Polat G, Erdil ME. The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and RAMP lesion repair on psychological status. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2023;33:2873–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03510-4
50. Saint-Etienne A, Benhenneda R, Vieira TD, Fayard JM, Thaunat M. Clinical Outcomes of Different Management Techniques for Medial Meniscal Type 3 Ramp Lesions in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis Between All-inside Repair, Suture Hook Repair, and Lesions Left In Situ. Am J Sports Med 2024;52:1250–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241232088
51. Toanen C, Sanchez M, Beaufils P, Pujol N. Ramp lesion repair via dual posteromedial arthroscopic portals: A cadaveric feasibility study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2022;108:103175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103175
52. Vadhera AS, Parvaresh K, Swindell HW, et al. Arthroscopic all - Inside repair of meniscal ramp lesions. J Isakos 2022;7:82–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2022.04.004
53. Chernchujit B, Loong LJ, Chaudhari S. Intercruciate trans-septal arthroscopic approach to the posterior compartment of the knee joint. J Isakos 2023;8:502–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2023.07.004
CRediT authorship contribution
All authors contributed equally to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.