Articles | Advances in Musculoskeletal and Neuromuscular Rehabilitation
Vol. 35 No. 3 (2025)
What matters in rehabilitation: a mixed methods study of critical success factors from the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 6 June 2025
Accepted: 6 August 2025
Accepted: 6 August 2025
273
Views
243
Downloads
2
HTML
Authors
The success of rehabilitation is usually assessed based on the results reported by patients and physicians. However, these assessments often vary and frequently fail to take psychosocial and contextual factors into account. This study investigated how Patient Researchers (PRs) and Healthcare Professional Researchers (HPRs) perceive rehabilitation outcomes and which Critical Success Factors (CSFs) they consider most influential. Using a participatory mixed-methods design, 90 anonymized patient records were evaluated and divided into groups based on good, poor, and conflicting outcomes. The participants – 3 PRs and 24 HPRs – assessed the success of rehabilitation and the potential significance of previously identified CSFs. In contrast to the HPRs, the PRs attributed greater influence to psychosocial factors. The HPRs generally provided a more accurate assessment of the outcome ratings in the patient records, correctly classifying 54.5% vs. 47.7%. Ultimately, the most important CSFs were incorporated into the Rehabilitation Expectation and Perception Scale (REPS), a screening instrument for identifying context-sensitive factors that influence rehabilitation success. This new approach supports personalized, context-sensitive rehabilitation planning, aiming to optimize treatment and facilitate a more nuanced assessment of rehabilitation success.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Citations
1. Stucki G, Cieza A. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in physical and rehabilitation medicine. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2008;44:299-302.
2. McPherson KM, Taylor WJ, Leplege A. Rehabilitation outcomes: values, methodologies and applications. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:961-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638281003672393
3. Unger A, Prüfer F, Matko Š, et al. Same but different? Exploring the role of patient-reported outcome measures and clinician-reported outcome measures in postoperative knee and hip arthroplasty rehabilitation. J Clin Med 2025;14:2322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072322
4. Bily W, Jauker J, Nics H, et al. Associations between patient-reported and clinician-reported outcome measures in patients after traumatic injuries of the lower limb. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:3140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19053140
5. Wilfong JM, Badley EM, Power JD, et al. Discordance between self-reported and performance-based function among knee osteoarthritis surgical patients: Variations by sex and obesity. PLoS One 2020;15:e0236865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236865
6. Twardzik E, Schrack JA, Freedman VA, et al. An incomplete model of disability: discrepancies between performance-based and self-reported measures of functioning. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2024;79:glad271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glad271
7. Razmjou H, Robarts S, Denis S, et al. Discordance between self-report and performance-based outcomes: Contribution of psychosocial factors. J Health Psychol 2025;30:1017-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053241253895
8. World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. 2001, World Health Organization: Geneva.
9. Riedl D, Rothmund MS, Grote V, et al. Mentalizing and epistemic trust as critical success factors in psychosomatic rehabilitation: results of a single center longitudinal observational study. Front Psychiatry 2023;14:1150422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1150422
10. Religioni U, Barrios-Rodríguez R, Requena P, et al. Enhancing therapy adherence: impact on clinical outcomes, healthcare costs, and patient quality of life. Medicina (Kaunas) 2025;61:153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61010153
11. Saegusa H, Kojima I, Terao Y, et al. The impact of changes in physical activity on functional recovery for older inpatients in post-acute rehabilitation units. Eur Geriatr Med 2024;15:1693-700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-024-01051-5
12. Sagen JS, Kjeken I, Habberstad A, et al. Patient involvement in the rehabilitation process is associated with improvement in function and goal attainment: results from an explorative longitudinal study. J Clin Med 2024;13:320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020320
13. Barbosa PM, Ferreira LN, Cruz VT, et al. Healthcare, clinical factors and rehabilitation predicting quality of life in first-time stroke patients: a 12-month longitudinal study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2022;31:106300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106300
14. Loidl V, Oberhauser C, Ballert C, et al. Which environmental factors have the highest impact on the performance of people experiencing difficulties in capacity? Int J Environ Res Public Health 2016;13:416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13040416
15. Bondesson E, Jöud A, Rivano Fischer M, Trulsson Schouenborg A. Can baseline characteristics predict successful outcomes after individual, physiotherapist-led rehabilitation in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain? Pain Res Manag 2023;2023:5182996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5182996
16. Kaisler RE, Paul JL. Evidence-based practice and polices for impact on mental health of children and adolescents. J Res Technol Policy Eval 2019;48:114-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2019.377
17. Wagner B, Zdravkovic A, Pirchl M, et al. Performance Score (T2D)-A new perspective in the assessment of six-minute walking tests in pulmonary rehabilitation. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022;12:2402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102402
18. Zdravkovic A, Grote V, Pirchl M, et al. Comparison of patient- and clinician-reported outcome measures in lower back rehabilitation: introducing a new integrated performance measure (t2D). Qual Life Res 2022;31:303-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02905-2
19. Kok AAL, Henstra MJ, van der Velde N, et al. Psychosocial and health-related factors associated with discordance between 13-year trajectories of self-reported functional limitations and performance-based physical functioning in old age. J Aging Health 2020;32:1084-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264319884404
20. Giardini A, Pistarini C. Implementing international classification of functioning disability and health in rehabilitation medicine: preliminary considerations from a nation-wide italian experience in routine clinical practice. J Int Soc Physical Rehabil Med 2019;2:107-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jisprm.jisprm_56_19
21. Rotter J. General expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs 1966;80:1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
22. Vaidis D. Cognitive dissonance theory. Oxford Bibliographies, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199828340-0156
Supporting Agencies
Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft Open Innovation in Science CenterHow to Cite
What matters in rehabilitation: a mixed methods study of critical success factors from the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals. (2025). European Journal of Translational Myology, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2025.14060
Copyright (c) 2025 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.