Articles | Advances in Musculoskeletal and Neuromuscular Rehabilitation

Regenerative response of rat skeletal muscle to the implantation of a collagen-based bone graft substitute: an in vivo study

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 1 January 2025
Published: 22 July 2025
908
Views
712
Downloads
8
HTML

Authors

The application of implantable biomaterials in reconstructive grafting is a common practice in surgical fields such as orthopedics, maxillary and plastic surgery. This study explores the regenerative response of skeletal muscle to a porous bovine collagen-based matrix (Osteovit®) in a volumetric muscle loss injury model. Forty male Wistar rats were divided into four groups. Normal control underwent no procedure and regenerative control had mepivacaine injected in the tibialis anterior muscle to provoke a standard regenerative response. In the other two groups, a volumetric defect was created in the tibialis anterior muscle; the fibrosis control had no treatment, while the collagen-scaffolding group had a bone substitution matrix implanted. Animals were sacrificed at 21, 28, and 60 days post-procedure for histological, histochemical, immunohistochemical and histomorphometry analysis to evaluate muscle architecture and myogenic regenerative response. Significant changes in tissue architecture among groups, with a notable emphasis on the integration of the collagen scaffold, were demonstrated. This was also confirmed at the histomorphometry analysis, which found differences at the cross-sectional area, minor diameter and form factor values between groups The bone substitution matrix did not inhibit regeneration but promoted an abnormal one. This can be explained by the excessive formation of connective tissue, which led to the genesis of intramuscular tendons that may have interfered with the normal development of regenerative muscle fibers. The findings highlight the need for further investigation into the cellular mechanisms underlying skeletal muscle regeneration in response to implantable biomaterials.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Turner NJ, Badylak SF. Regeneration of skeletal muscle. Cell Tissue Res 2012;347:759-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-011-1185-7

Edouard P, Reurink G, Mackey AL, et al. Traumatic muscle injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2023;9:56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-023-00469-8

Sicari BM, Dearth CL, Badylak SF. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches to enhance the functional response to skeletal muscle injury. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2014;297:51-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22794

Forcina L, Cosentino M, Musarò A. Mechanisms regulating muscle regeneration: insights into the interrelated and time-dependent phases of tissue healing. Cells 2020;9:1297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9051297

Raghuram A, Singh A, Chang DK, et al. Bone grafts, bone substitutes, and orthobiologics: applications in plastic surgery. Semin Plast Surg 2019;33:190-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1693020

Testa S, Fornetti E, Fuoco C, et al. The war after war: volumetric muscle loss incidence, implication, current therapies and emerging reconstructive strategies, a comprehensive review. Biomedicines 2021;9:564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9050564

Kunert-Keil C, Botzenhart U, Gedrange T, Gredes T. Interrelationship between bone substitution materials and skeletal muscle tissue. Ann Anat 2015;199:73-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2014.07.008

Pradel W, Lauer G. Tissue-engineered bone grafts for osteoplasty in patients with cleft alveolus. Ann Anat 2012;194:545-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2012.06.002

Leiva-Cepas F, Benito-Ysamat A, Jimena I, et al. Ultrasonographic and histological correlation after experimental reconstruction of a volumetric muscle loss injury with adipose tissue. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:6689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22136689

Jiménez-Díaz F, Jimena I, Luque E, et al. Experimental muscle injury: correlation between ultrasound and histological findings. Muscle Nerve 2012;45:705-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.23243

Leiva-Cepas F, Jimena I, Ruz-Caracuel I, et al. Histology of skeletal muscle reconstructed by means of the implantation of autologous adipose tissue: an experimental study. Histol Histopathol 2020;35:457-74.

Dubowitz VA, Sewry C, Oldfors A. Muscle biopsy: A practical approach. 5th Edition. Elsevier; 2021.

Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, et al A. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 2012;9:676-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019

Turner NJ, Pezzone MA, Brown BN, Badylak SF. Quantitative multispectral imaging of Herovici's polychrome for the assessment of collagen content and tissue remodelling. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2013;7:139-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/term.508

Aguilar CA, Greising SM, Watts A, et al. Multiscale analysis of a regenerative therapy for treatment of volumetric muscle loss injury. Cell Death Discov 2018;4:33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-018-0080-3

Kin S, Hagiwara A, Nakase Y, et al. Regeneration of skeletal muscle using in situ tissue engineering on an acellular collagen sponge scaffold in a rabbit model. ASAIO J 2007;53:506-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0b013e3180d09d81

Liu X, Gao Y, Long X, et al. Type I collagen promotes the migration and myogenic differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts via the release of interleukin-6 mediated by FAK/NF-κB p65 activation. Food Funct 2020;11:328-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9FO01346F

Grefte S, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Torensma R, Von den Hoff JW. Model for muscle regeneration around fibrotic lesions in recurrent strain injuries. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010;42:813-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181beeb52

De Paolis F, Testa S, Guarnaccia G, et al. Long-term longitudinal study on swine VML model. Biol Direct 2023;18:42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-023-00399-1

Alexakis C, Partridge T, Bou-Gharios G. Implication of the satellite cell in dystrophic muscle fibrosis: a self-perpetuating mechanism of collagen overproduction. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2007;293:C661-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00061.2007

Grefte S, Adjobo-Hermans MJW, Versteeg EMM, et al. Impaired primary mouse myotube formation on crosslinked type I collagen films is enhanced by laminin and entactin. Acta Biomater 2016;30:265-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.009

Eugenis I, Wu D, Rando TA. Cells, scaffolds, and bioactive factors: Engineering strategies for improving regeneration following volumetric muscle loss. Biomaterials 2021;278:121173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121173

Kozan NG, Joshi M, Sicherer ST, Grasman JM. Porous biomaterial scaffolds for skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023;11:1245897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1245897

Kim J, Kasukonis B, Roberts K, et al. Graft alignment impacts the regenerative response of skeletal muscle after volumetric muscle loss in a rat model. Acta Biomater 2020;105:191-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.01.024

Lee AS, Anderson JE, Joya JE, et al. Aged skeletal muscle retains the ability to fully regenerate functional architecture. Bioarchitecture 2013;3:25-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4161/bioa.24966

Hardy D, Besnard A, Latil M, et al. Comparative study of injury models for studying muscle regeneration in mice. PLoS One 2016;11:e0147198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147198

Peña J, Luque E, Noguera F, et al. Experimental induction of ring fibers in regenerating skeletal muscle. Pathol Res Pract 2001;197:21-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1078/0344-0338-00004

Pontén E, Fridén J. Immobilization of the rabbit tibialis anterior muscle in a lengthened position causes addition of sarcomeres in series and extra-cellular matrix proliferation. J Biomech 2008;41:1801-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.006

Csapo R, Gumpenberger M, Wessner B. Skeletal muscle extracellular matrix - what do we know about its composition, regulation, and physiological roles? A Narrative Review. Front Physiol 2020;11:253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00253

Winkler T, von Roth P, Matziolis G, et al. Time course of skeletal muscle regeneration after severe trauma. Acta Orthop 2011;82:102-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.539498

Swery CA, Goebel HH. General pathology of muscle disease. In: Goebel HH, Swery CA, Weller RO, eds. Muscle Disease: Pathology and Genetics, second edition. John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2013. pp 19-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118635469.ch3

Roßbach BP, Gülecyüz MF, Kempfert L, et al. Rotator cuff repair with autologous tenocytes and biodegradable collagen scaffold: a histological and biomechanical study in sheep. Am J Sports Med 2020;48:450-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546519892580

Davies OG, Liu Y, Player DJ, et al. Defining the balance between regeneration and pathological ossification in skeletal muscle following traumatic injury. Front Physiol 2017;8:194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00194

Scarano A, Ceccarelli M, Marchetti M, et al. Soft tissue augmentation with autologous platelet gel and β-TCP: a histologic and histometric study in mice. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:2078104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2078104

Marchetti E, Mancini L, Bernardi S, et al. Evaluation of different autologous platelet concentrate biomaterials: morphological and biological comparisons and considerations. Materials (Basel) 2020;13:2282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13102282

Pedret C, Peña-Amaro J, Balius R, Järvinen T. Histological definition of skeletal muscle injury: a guide to nomenclature along the connective tissue sheath/structure. Sports Med 2025;55:1061-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-024-02165-3

How to Cite



1.
Leiva-Cepas F, Gil-Belmonte MJ, Jimena I, Peña-Toledo MA, Villalba R, Peña-Amaro J. Regenerative response of rat skeletal muscle to the implantation of a collagen-based bone graft substitute: an in vivo study. Eur J Transl Myol [Internet]. 2025 Jul. 22 [cited 2026 Apr. 30];35(4). Available from: https://www.pagepressjournals.org/bam/article/view/13574