A comparative analysis of Rotterdam score and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting outcomes for patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury

Submitted: 30 November 2024
Accepted: 14 December 2024
Published: 21 February 2025
Abstract Views: 368
PDF: 106
Supplementary Materials: 68
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

This study aimed to evaluate the role of NLR in predicting outcomes for patients with moderate to severe TBI. A retrospective analysis was conducted from April 2020 to April 2022, including patients aged 16 and older with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 8 or below admitted to Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Kashan. Data on NLR and other clinical markers were collected. Rotterdam scores were calculated using CT scan findings. Patients were followed up for six months post-trauma or until death, and associations between NLR and clinical outcomes were analyzed, with significance set at P < 0.05. Among 195 patients, 130 (66%) had unfavorable outcomes at six months. Admission NLR was significantly higher in patients with unfavorable outcomes compared to those with favorable outcomes (P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that NLR had a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 91% at a threshold of 5.2 for predicting unfavorable outcomes. Elevated admission NLR in patients with severe TBI was linked to unfavorable six-month functional outcomes and mortality. NLR may serve as a readily accessible clinical marker for prognostication in moderate to severe TBI.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi M, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020;396:1204-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9
de Silva MJ, Roberts I, Perel P, et al. Patient outcome after traumatic brain injury in high-, middle- and low-income countries: Analysis of data on 8927 patients in 46 countries. Internat J Epidemiol 2009;38:452-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyn189
Guan B, Anderson DB, Chen L, et al. Global, regional and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. BMJ Open 2023;13:e075049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075049
de Oliveira DV, Vieira RdCA, Pipek LZ, et al. Long-term outcomes in severe traumatic brain injury and associated factors: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Med 2022;11:6466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216466
Mostert CQB, Singh RD, Gerritsen M, et al. Long-term outcome after severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic literature review. Acta Neurochirurgica 2022;164:599-613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-05086-6
Farzandipour M, Ghattan H, Mazrouei L, et al. Epidemiological study of traumatic patients referred to neghavi hospital of kashan. J Kermanshah Univer Med Sci 2007;11:e81870.
Formisano R, Contrada M, Ferri G, et al. The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended-Revised (GOSE-R) to include Minimally conscious state in the vegetative state/ unresponsive wakefulness syndrome category: a correlation with Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2019;55:139-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05441-2
Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, et al. A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 1991;75:S14-S20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/sup.1991.75.1s.0s14
Maas AIR, Hukkelhoven CWPM, Marshall LF, Steyerberg EW. Prediction of outcome in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic characteristics: A comparison between the computed tomographic classification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors. Neurosurgery 2005;57:1173-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000186013.63046.6B
Raj R, Siironen J, Skrifvars MB, et al. Predicting outcome in traumatic brain injury: Development of a novel computerized tomography classification system (Helsinki Computerized Tomography Score). Neurosurgery 2014;75:632-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000533
Käsmann L, Bolm L, Schild SE, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts outcome in limited disease small-cell lung cancer. Lung 2017;195:217-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-017-9976-6
Aghbash PS, Rasizadeh R, Shirvaliloo M, et al. Dynamic alterations in white blood cell counts and SARS-CoV-2 shedding in saliva: an infection predictor parameter. Front Med 2023;10:1208928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1208928
Seyit M, Avci E, Nar R, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio to predict the severity of COVID-19. Am J Emerg Med 2020;40:110-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.11.058
Postolache TT, Wadhawan A, Can A, et al. Inflammation in traumatic brain injury. J Alz Dis 2020;74:1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-191150
Chen J, Qu X, Li Z, et al. Peak neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio correlates with clinical outcomes in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Neurocritical Care 2019;30:334-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-018-0622-9
Chen W, Yang J, Li B, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as a novel predictor of outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2018;33:E53-E9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000320
Zhao JL, Du ZY, Yuan Q, et al. Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting the 6-month outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury: a retrospective study. world neurosurgery. 2019;124:e411-e6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.107
Bozan Ö, Altunok İ. Comparison of prognostic computed tomography scores in geriatric patients with traumatic brain injury: a retrospective study. J Contemp Med 2022;12:177-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.1009858
Lowsby R, Gomes C, Jarman I, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte count ratio as an early indicator of blood stream infection in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 2015;32:531-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2014-204071
Sabouri E, Majdi A, Jangjui P, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and traumatic brain injury: a review study. World Neurosurg 2020;140:142-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.185
Han S, Liu Y, Li Q, et al. Pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with neutrophil and T-cell infiltration and predicts clinical outcome in patients with glioblastoma. BMC Cancer 2015;15:617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1629-7
Inanc Y, Inanc Y. The effects of neutrophil to lymphocyte and platelet to lymphocyte ratios on prognosis in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. Annali Italiani di Chirurgia 2018;89:367-73.
Zhuang D, Sheng J, Peng G, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts early growth of traumatic intracerebral haemorrhage. Annal Clin Translat Neurol 2021;8:1601-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51409
Alimohammadi E, Foroushani AZ, Moradi F, et al. Dynamics of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio can be associated with clinical outcomes of children with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A retrospective observational study. Injury 2022;53:999-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.09.052

How to Cite

Aghadoost, H., Salehabadi, G., Fakharian, E., & Mohammadabad, H. J. (2025). A comparative analysis of Rotterdam score and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting outcomes for patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. European Journal of Translational Myology. https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2025.13443

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.