Standardised indexes reduce the variability of masticatory muscles electromyographic values

Published: 25 February 2025
Abstract Views: 390
PDF: 126
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

In dentistry, surface electromyography (sEMG) is currently used in both clinical and research fields to study the electrical activity of the masticatory muscles, such as the anterior Temporals and Masseters, which are easily accessible. Due to biological and technical factors that can alter the capture of the sEMG signal, comparing recordings obtained from the same subject at different days, with electrode replacement, can be challenging, thus complicating inter- and intra-subject sEMG comparisons. In the present study, sEMG activity of the masticatory muscles during maximum teeth clenching was simultaneously recorded using two different electrode configurations (A and B) to simulate different electrodes positioning as may occur between appointments. Raw sEMG signals and standardised indexes based on acquisitions from configurations A and B were compared. The position of the electrodes significantly affected the sEMG raw potentials of the masticatory muscles during maximum teeth clenching, while standardised indexes were not influenced by electrode positioning.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Colombo A, Ciusa V. An electromyographic investigation of masticatory muscles symmetry in normo-occlusion subjects. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:33-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00490.x
Mapelli A, Zanandréa Machado BC, Giglio LD, et al. Reorganization of muscle activity in patients with chronic temporomandibular disorders. Arch Oral Biol 2016;72:164-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.08.022
Di Giacomo P, Ferrato G, Serritella E, et al. Muscular pattern in patients with temporomandibular joint disc displacement with reduction: an electromyographical assessment. Clin Ter 2020;171:e414-e420.
Suvinen TI, Kemppainen P. Review of clinical EMG studies related to muscle and occlusal factors in healthy and TMD subjects. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:631-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01769.x
Klasser GD, Okeson JP. The clinical usefulness of surface electromyography in the diagnosis and treatment of temporomandibular disorders. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:763-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0288
Farina D, Cescon C, Merletti R. Influence of anatomical, physical, and detection-system parameters on surface EMG. Biol Cybern 2002;86:445-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-002-0309-2
Lapatki BG, Oostenveld R, Van Dijk JP, et al. Optimal placement of bipolar surface EMG electrodes in the face based on single motor unit analysis. Psychophysiology 2010;47:299-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00935.x
Dimitrov GV, Disselhorst-Klug C, Dimitrova NA, et al. Simulation analysis of the ability of different types of multi-electrodes to increase selectivity of detection and to reduce cross-talk. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2003;13:125–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(02)00095-0
Dimitrova NA, Dimitrov GV, Nikitin OA. Neither high-pass filtering nor mathematical differentiation of the EMG signals can considerably reduce cross-talk. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2002;12:235–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(02)00008-1
Keenan KG, Collins JD, Massey WV, et al. Coherence between surface electromyograms is influenced by electrode placement in hand muscles. J Neurosci Methods 2011;195:10-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.10.018
Castroflorio T, Farina D, Bottin A, et al. Surface EMG of jaw elevator muscles: effect of electrode location and inter-electrode distance. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:411-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01442.x
Ferreira MC, Porto de Toledo I, Dutra KL, et al. Association between chewing dysfunctions and temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2018;45:819-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12681
Al-Saleh MA, Armijo-Olivo S, Flores-Mir C, Thie NM. Electromyography in diagnosing temporomandibular disorders. J Am Dent Assoc 2012;143:351-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0177
Ferrario VF, Tartaglia GM, Galletta A, et al. The influence of occlusion on jaw and neck muscle activity: a surface EMG study in healthy young adults. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:341-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01558.x
Mapelli A, Tartaglia GM, Connelly ST, et al. Normalizing surface electromyographic measures of the masticatory muscles: Comparison of two different methods for clinical purpose. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2016;30:238-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.08.004
Tartaglia GM, Moreira Rodrigues da Silva MA, Bottini S, et al. Masticatory muscle activity during maximum voluntary clench in different research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC ⁄ TMD) groups. Man Ther 2008;13:434–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2007.05.011
De Felício CM, Sidequersky FV, Tartaglia GM, Sforza C. Electromyographic standardized indices in healthy Brazilian young adults and data reproducibility. J Oral Rehabil 2009;36:577-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01970.x
Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Tartaglia GM, Dellavia C. Immediate effect of a stabilization splint on masticatory muscle activity in temporomandibular disorder patients. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:810-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00927.x
De Menezes M, Rosati R, Ferrario VF, Sforza C. Accuracy and reproducibility of a 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetric imaging system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:2129-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.036
Rosati R, De Menezes M, Rossetti A, et al. Digital dental cast placement in 3-dimensional, full-face reconstruction: a technical evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:84-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.035
Rosati R, Val M, Manfredini D, et al. Baseline masticatory muscles' performance may predict pain relief in temporomandibular disorders. Oral Dis 2024 May 28. doi: 10.1111/odi.15011. Epub ahead of print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.15011
Peretta R, Melison M, Meneghello R, et al. Unilateral masseter muscle hypertrophy: morphofunctional analysis of the relapse after treatment with botulinum toxin. Cranio 2009;27:200-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/crn.2009.030
Im YG, Han SH, Park JI, et al. Repeatability of measurements of surface electromyographic variables during maximum voluntary contraction of temporalis and masseter muscles in normal adults. J Oral Sci 2017;59:233-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.16-0434
Dellavia C, Francetti L, Rosati R, et al. Electromyographic assessment of jaw muscles in patients with All-on-Four fixed implant-supported prostheses. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39:896-904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12002
Musto F, Rosati R, Sforza C, et al. Standardised surface electromyography allows effective submental muscles assessment. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2017;34:1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.02.008
Naeije M, McCarroll RS, Weijs WA. Electromyographic activity of the human masticatory muscles during submaximal clenching in the inter-cuspal position. J Oral Rehabil 1989;16:63-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1989.tb01318.x
Burden A, Bartlett R. Normalisation of EMG amplitude: an evaluation and comparison of old and new methods. Med Eng Phys 1999;21:247-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4533(99)00054-5
Merlo A, Bò MC, Campanini I. Electrode Size and Placement for Surface EMG Bipolar Detection from the Brachioradialis Muscle: A Scoping Review. Sensors (Basel) 2021;21:7322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s21217322
Mesin L, Merletti R, Rainoldi A. Surface EMG: the issue of electrode location. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2009;19:719-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.07.006
Armijo-Olivo S, Gadotti I, Kornerup M, et al. Quality of reporting masticatory muscle electromyography in 2004: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:397-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01706.x

How to Cite

Rosati, R., Carmagnola, D., Pellegrini, G., Henin, D., Vella, M., & Dellavia, C. (2025). Standardised indexes reduce the variability of masticatory muscles electromyographic values. European Journal of Translational Myology. https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2025.13420

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.