Management of encrusted ureteral stents: Two center experience
https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2022.3.305
Accepted: June 23, 2022
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Introduction: We present our experience of the endourological management of encrusted ureteral stents (EUS) and a literature review on forgotten encrusted ureteral stents.
Methods: A total of 13 encrusted ureteral stents from 12 patients were removed in two hospitals. The medical records were retrospectively analyzed for stent indication, indwelling time, clinical presentation, investigations, type and the number of surgical procedures, operative time, complications, duration of hospital stay, and the follow-up.
Results: Five ureteral stents (US) inserted before ESWL
(extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy) for renal stones, seven US for ureteric stones with ureteric colic, and one ureteral stent for post ureteroscopy procedure. The mean indwelling time was 15.07 ± 7.34 months with a range from 6 to 24 months.
The mean Kidney,Ureter and Bladder (KUB) score of encrusta-tion grading was 11.84 ± 2.07 with a range from 9 to 15. The encrusted stents were removed by a combination of cystolithotripsy, semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy
(PCNL), and ESWL. The average total number of procedures to remove one EUS was 3 ± 1.08 with a range of 2 to 5 proce-dures. Six encrusted stents were removed in one, five stents required two, one stent required three and one stent required four hospital admissions. The median operative time was 210 minutes with a range of 60 to 660 minutes per EUS removal and the mean hospital stay was 2.69 ± 1.43 days with a range of 1 to 6 days. All patients had successful removal of encrusted stent and complete stone clearance with no major complica-tions. In the follow-up, one patient had recurrent ureteric stone, one patient on regular stent exchange due to poor renal function and one patient developed significant ureteric stricture referred for reconstruction.
Conclusions: Removal of forgotten encrusted impacted ureteral stents is challenging and requires a multimodal surgical approach. It adds significant costs to the health care system and in addition it affects patient safety and quality of life. Patient education, avoiding unnecessary ureteral stent place-ment and a computerized stent monitoring system reduces the incidence of forgotten ureteral stents and their complications.
Lange D, Bidnur S, Hoag N, Chew BH. Ureteral stent-associated complications-where we are and where we are going. Nat Rev Urol. 2015; 12:17-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2014.340
Divakaruni N, Palmer CJ, Tek P, et al. Forgotten ureteral stents: who's at risk? J Endourol. 2013; 27:1051-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0754
Osman N, Collins G. Urological litigation in the UK National Health Service (NHS): an analysis of 14 years of successful claims. BJU international 2011; 108:162-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10130.x
Alnadhari I, Alwan M, Salah M, Ghilan A. Treatment of retained encrusted ureteral Double-J stent. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2019; 90:265-269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2018.4.265
Sancaktutar A, H HS, Bozkurt Y, Penbegül N, Atar M. Treatment of forgotten ureteral stents: how much does it really cost? A cost-effec-tiveness study in 27 patients. Urol Res. 2012; 40:317-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-011-0409-3
el-Faqih SR, Shamsuddin AB, Chakrabarti A, et al. Polyurethane internal ureteral stents in treatment of stone patients: morbidity related to indwelling times. J Urol 1991; 146:1487-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38146-6
Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, et al. Ureteral stent encrustation, incrustation, and coloring: morbidity related to indwelling times. J Endourol. 2012; 26:178-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0385
Tunney MM, Keane PF, Jones DS, Gorman SP. Comparative assessment of ureteral stent biomaterial encrustation. Biomaterials. 1996; 17:1541-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(96)89780-8
Shabeena KS, Bhargava R, Manzoor MAP, Mujeeburahiman M. Characteristics of bacterial colonization after indwelling double-J ureteral stents for different time duration. Urol Ann. 2018; 10:71-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_158_17
Zampini A, Nguyen A, Rose E, et al. Defining dysbiosis in patients with urolithiasis. Sci Rep. 2019; 9:5425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41977-6
Beysens M, Tailly TO. Ureteral stents in urolithiasis. Asian J Urol. 2018; 5:274-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2018.07.002
Tomer N, Garden E, Small A, Palese M. Ureteral stent encrus-tation: epidemiology, pathophysiology, management and current technology. J Urol. 2021; 205:68-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001343
Abdelaziz AY WBF, Mosharafa AA, Abelrasoul MA, et al. Forgotten ureteral stents: Risk factors, complications and manage-ment. African Journal of Urology. 2018; 24:28-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afju.2017.09.005
Arenas JL, Shen JK, Keheila M, et al. Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder (KUB): A novel grading system for encrusted ureteral stents. Urology. 2016; 97:51-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.050
Lam J, Gupta M. Tips and tricks for the management of retained ureteral stents. J Endourol. 2002; 16:733-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/08927790260472881
Bultitude MF, Tiptaft RC, Glass JM, Dasgupta P. Management of encrusted ureteral stents impacted in upper tract. Urology. 2003; 62:622-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00506-5
De Rose AF, Di Grazia E, Magnano San Lio V, et al. Complications of endourological procedures and their treatment. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2020; 92:321-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2020.4.321
Monga M, Klein E, Castañeda-Zúñiga W, Thomas R. The for-gotten indwelling ureteral stent: a urological dilemma. J Urol. 1995; 153:1817-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67319-1
Barghouthy Y, Wiseman O, Ventimiglia E, et al. Silicone-hydro-coated ureteral stents encrustation and biofilm formation after 3-week dwell time: results of a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. World J Urol. 2021; 39:3623-3629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03646-0
Venkatesan N, Shroff S, Jayachandran K, Doble M. Polymers as ureteral stents. J Endourol. 2010; 24:191-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0516
Ahmed E. Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applica-tions: A review.J Adv Res. 2015; 6:105-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2013.07.006
Singha P, Locklin J, Handa H. A review of the recent advances in antimicrobial coatings for urinary catheters. Acta Biomater. 2017; 50:20-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.070
Al-Aown A, Kyriazis I, Kallidonis P, et al. Ureteral stents: new ideas, new designs. Ther Adv Urol. 2010; 2:85-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287210370699
Glinel K, Thebault P, Humblot V, Pradier C, TJouenne. Antibacterial surfaces developed from bio-inspired approaches. Acta Biomater. 2012; 8:1670-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.01.011
Kallidonis P, Georgiopoulos I, Kyriazis I, et al. The full metallic double-pigtail ureteral stent: Review of the clinical outcome and cur-rent status. Indian J Urol. 2015; 31:8-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.134232
Janssen P, Tailly T. New stent technologies. Urol Clin North Am. 2022; 49:185-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2021.08.004
Monga M. The dwell time of indwelling ureteral stents--the clock is ticking but when should we set the alarm? J Urol. 2011; 185:387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.017
Lin K, Chen P, Fan Y, Huang W. Preventing forgotten double J ureteral stents in a high-volume service medical center: An autoreg-istration monitoring system. J Chin Med Assoc. 2020; 83:382-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000281
Branch HsI. Unplanned delayed removal of ureteric stent. Healthcare safety Investigation Branch. https://www.hsib.org.uk/inves-tigations-and-reports/unplanned-delayed-removal-of-ureteric-stents/
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Downloads
Citations
