https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2022.2.180

Comparative analysis of MOSESTM technology versus novel thulium fiber laser (TFL) for transurethral enucleation of the prostate: A single-institutional study

Vol. 94 No. 2 (2022)
Submitted: March 23, 2022
Accepted: April 25, 2022
Published: June 29, 2022
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Laser, Enucleation
Abstract Views: 1561
PDF: 719
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Hazem Elmansy
hazem.mansy@rocketmail.com
Urology Department, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Amr Hodhod
Urology Department, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Ahmed Elshafei
Urology Department, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Yasser A. Noureldin
Urology Department, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada; Urology Department, Benha University, Benha, Egypt.
Vahid Mehrnoush
Urology Department, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Ahmed S. Zakaria
Urology Department, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Ruba Abdul Hadi
Urology Department, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Moustafa Fathy
Urology Department, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada; Urology Department, Menoufia University, Shebin Elkom, Egypt.
Loay Abbas
Urology Department, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Ahmed Kotb
Urology Department, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Walid Shahrour
Urology Department, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.

Introduction: Novel laser technologies have been developed for the minimally invasive surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of MOSESTM technology versus the thulium fiber laser (TFL) in patients with BPH undergoing transurethral enucleation of the prostate.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of eighty-two patients who underwent transurethral enucleation of the prostate using MOSESTM or TFL technologies from August 2020 to September 2021. Preoperative and intraoperative parameters, in addition to postoperative outcomes, were collected and analyzed.
Results: Twenty patients underwent transurethral enucleation of the prostate with TFL, while 62 had MOSESTM HoLEP. No statistically significant difference in preoperative characteristics was observed between the groups. Patients in the TFL group had longer median enucleation, hemostasis, and morcellation times (p < 0.001) than those in the MOSESTM cohort. The longer morcellation time of TFL is mostly related to less visibility. The postoperative outcomes IPSS, QoL, Qmax, and post void residual (PVR), were comparable between the groups at 1, 3 and 6 months. The incidence of urge urinary incontinence (p = 0.79), stress urinary incontinence (p = 0.97), and hospital readmission rates (p = 0.1) were comparable between the two groups.
Conclusions: A satisfactory safety and efficacy profile with comparable postoperative outcomes was demonstrated for both techniques; though, MOSESTM technology was superior to TFL in terms of shorter overall operative time.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Herrmann TR. Enucleation is enucleation is enucleation is enucleation. World J Urol 2016; 34(10): 1353-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1922-3
Kuntz RM, Ahyai S, Lehrich K, Fayad A. Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral electrocautery resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial in 200 patients. J Urol 2004; 172(3): 1012-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000136218.11998.9e
Li S, Zeng XT, Ruan XL, Weng H, Liu TZ, Wang X, et al. Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia: an updated systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9(7): e101615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101615
Yin L, Teng J, Huang CJ, Zhang X, Xu D. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Endourol 2013; 27(5): 604-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0505
Naspro R, Suardi N, Salonia A, Scattoni V, Guazzoni G, Colombo R, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates >70 g: 24-month follow-up. Eur Urol 2006; 50(3): 563-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.04.003
Schiavina R, Bianchi L, Giampaoli M, Borghesi M, Dababneh H, Chessa F, et al. Holmium laser prostatectomy in a tertiary Italian center: A prospective cost analysis in comparison with bipolar TURP and open prostatectomy. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2020; 92(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2020.2.82
Gurlen G, Karkin K. Does Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) still have a steep learning curve? Our experience of 100 consecutive cases from Turkey. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2021; 93(4): 412-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2021.4.412
Ibrahim A, Alharbi M, Elhilali MM, Aube M, Carrier S. 18 Years of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Single Center Experience. J Urol 2019; 202(4): 795-800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000280
Large T, Nottingham C, Stoughton C, Williams J, Jr., Krambeck A. Comparative Study of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate With MOSES Enabled Pulsed Laser Modulation. Urology 2020; 136: 196-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.029
Nevo A, Faraj KS, Cheney SM, Moore JP, Stern KL, Borofsky M, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using Moses 2.0 vs non-Moses: a randomised controlled trial. BJU Int 2021; 127(5): 553-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15265
Fried NM, Murray KE. High-power thulium fiber laser ablation of urinary tissues at 1.94 microm. J Endourol 2005; 19(1): 25-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2005.19.25
Enikeev D, Glybochko P, Rapoport L, Gahan J, Gazimiev M, Spivak L, et al. A Randomized Trial Comparing The Learning Curve of 3 Endoscopic Enucleation Techniques (HoLEP, ThuFLEP, and MEP) for BPH Using Mentoring Approach-Initial Results. Urology 2018; 121: 51-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.06.045
Enikeev D, Netsch C, Rapoport L, Gazimiev M, Laukhtina E, Snurnitsyna O, et al. Novel thulium fiber laser for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: A prospective comparison with conventional transurethral resection of the prostate. Int J Urol 2019; 26(12): 1138-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14115
Enikeev D, Okhunov Z, Rapoport L, Taratkin M, Enikeev M, Snurnitsyna O, et al. Novel Thulium Fiber Laser for Enucleation of Prostate: A Retrospective Comparison with Open Simple Prostatectomy. J Endourol 2019; 33(1): 16-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0791
Elmansy H, Hodhod A, Kotb A, Prowse O, Shahrour W. Top-down Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Technical Aspects and Early Outcomes. Urology 2019; 126: 236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.01.019
Elmansy H, Shabana W, Waugh M, Ahmad A, Hadi RA, Shahrour W. Top-down thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate: technical aspects. Cent European J Urol 2021; 74(2): 271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2021.0010.R1
Palumbo P, Tellan G, Perotti B, Pacile MA, Vietri F, Illuminati G. Modified PADSS (Post Anaesthetic Discharge Scoring System) for monitoring outpatients discharge. Ann Ital Chir 2013; 84(6): 661-5.
Abdul-Muhsin H, Critchlow W, Navaratnam A, Gnecco J, Tay K, Girardo M, et al. Feasibility of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate as a 1-day surgery. World J Urol 2020; 38(4): 1017-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02831-6
Becker B, Netsch C, Glybochko P, Rapoport L, Taratkin M, Enikeev D. A Feasibility Study Utilizing the Thulium and Holmium Laser in Patients for the Treatment of Recurrent Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia after Previous Prostatic Surgery. Urol Int 2018; 101(2): 212-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000489858
Nottingham CU, Large T, Agarwal DK, Rivera ME, Krambeck AE. Comparison of Newly Optimized Moses Technology vs Standard Holmium:YAG for Endoscopic Laser Enucleation of the Prostate. J Endourol 2021; 35(9): 1393-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0996
Doizi S, Germain T, Panthier F, Comperat E, Traxer O, Berthe L. Comparison of Holmium:YAG and Thulium Fiber Lasers on Soft Tissue: An Ex Vivo Study. J Endourol 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2021.0263
Slade A, Agarwal D, Large T, Sahm E, Schmidt J, Rivera ME. Expanded Criteria Same Day Catheter Removal Following Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP). J Endourol 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0007

How to Cite

Elmansy, H., Hodhod, A. ., Elshafei, A. ., Noureldin, Y. A. ., Mehrnoush, V. ., Zakaria, A. S. ., Hadi, R. A. ., Fathy, M. ., Abbas, L. ., Kotb, A. ., & Shahrour, W. . (2022). Comparative analysis of MOSES<sup>TM</sup> technology versus novel thulium fiber laser (TFL) for transurethral enucleation of the prostate: A single-institutional study. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 94(2), 180–185. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2022.2.180

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.