Outcomes of fluoroscopy-free retrograde intrarenal surgery and predictive factors of stone-free
https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2021.4.425
Accepted: October 28, 2021
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of flouroscopy-free retrograde intrarenal surgery (ffRIRS) and to investigate the factors that may affect stone-free rate.
Materials and methods: The charts of patients who underwent ffRIRS between January 2017 and August 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with missing preoperative imaging and patients with kidney anomalies were excluded from the study. Age, gender, stone size, stone localization, stone density, laterality, operation time, stone-free rate, complications and auxiliary procedures were recorded and analyzed.
Results: Study group involved 44 (43.1%) female and 58 (56.8%) male patients. Stone-free rate in a single-session ffRIRS were found to be correlated with stone localization (p = 0.003), stone volume (p = 0.004), and stone density (p = 0.009) but not with age (p = 0.950). Patients with multiple calyceal stones and a stone burden over 520 mm3 were found to be less stone-free. The complication rate in female gender (n = 7) was significantly higher compared to male (n = 1) (p = 0.011). No major complications such as ureteral injury or avulsion were observed. Overall, 13 patients (12.7%) needed auxiliary procedures. The operation time seemed to be affected by stone size and gender (p = 0.005; p = 0.044, respectively).
Conclusions: Stone-free rate in ffRIRS were found to be affected by stone density, size, and localization. Patients with multiple caliceal stones and high stone burden (< 520 mm3) have been found to have low stone-free rate, so one can speculate that having fluoroscopy assistance in RIRS might help us to improve surgical success.
Olgin G, Smith D, Alsyouf M, et al. Ureteroscopy without fluoroscopy: a feasibility study and comparison with conventional ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2015; 29:625-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0237
Krupp N, Bowman R, Tenggardjaja C, et al. Fluoroscopic organ and tissue-specific radiation exposure by sex and body mass index during ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2010; 24:1067-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0040
Park J, Kang M, Jeong CW, et al. External validation and evaluation of reliability and validity of the modified seoul national university renal stone complexity scoring system to predict stone-free status after retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Endourol. 2015; 29:888-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0901
Foda K, Abdeldaeim H, Youssif M, Assem A. Calculating the number of shock waves, expulsion time, and optimum stone parameters based on noncontrast computerized tomography characteristics. Urology. 2013; 82:1026-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.06.061
Cakiroglu B, Eyyupoglu SE, Tas T, et al. Are Hounsfield densities of ureteral stones a predictive factor for effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014; 7:1276.
Peng Y, Xu B, Zhang W, et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal stones: is fluoroscopy-free technique achievable? Urolithiasis. 2015; 43:265-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0760-x
Karaaslan M, Tonyali S, Yilmaz M, et al. Ureteral access sheath use in retrograde intrarenal surgery. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2019;91:112-114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2019.2.112
Emiliani E, Motta G, Llorens E, et al. Totally fluoroless retrograde intrarenal surgery technique in prestented patients: tips and tricks. J Pediatr Urol. 2019; 15:570-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.06.017
Tepeler A, Armagan A, Akman T, et al. Is fluoroscopic imaging mandatory for endoscopic treatment of ureteral stones? Urology. 2012; 80:1002-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.082
Hein S, Schoenthaler M, Wilhelm K, et al. Ultralow radiation exposure during flexible ureteroscopy in patients with nephrolithiasis—How far can we go? Urology. 2017; 108:34-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.06.016
Boulalas I, De Dominicis M, Defidio L. Semirigid ureteroscopy prior retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) helps to select the right ureteral access sheath. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2018; 90:20-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2018.1.20
Ekici M, Özgür BC, S¸entürk AB, et al. All-seeing-access sheath: A novel fluoroscopy-free placement technique in retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019; 29:263-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2019.03.263
Sönmez MG, Kara C. A new approach in ureteral access sheath locating in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) by endovisional technique. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2015; 87:286-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2015.4.286
Manzo BO, Lozada E, Manzo G, et al. Radiation-free flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stone treatment. Arab J Urol. 2019; 17:200-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1606381
Resorlu B, Unsal A, Gulec H, Oztuna D. A new scoring system for predicting stone-free rate after retrograde intrarenal surgery: the “resorlu-unsal stone score”. Urology. 2012; 80:512-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.072
Lim SH, Jeong BC, Seo SI, et al. Treatment outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones and predictive factors of stonefree. Korean J Urol. 2010; 51:777-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.11.777
Wendt-Nordahl G, Mut T, Krombach P, et al. Do new generation flexible ureterorenoscopes offer a higher treatment success than their predecessors? Urol Res. 2011; 39:185-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0331-0
Geraghty R, Abourmarzouk O, Rai B, et al. Evidence for ureterorenoscopy and laser fragmentation (URSL) for large renal stones in the modern era. Curr Urol Rep. 2015; 16:54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-015-0529-3
Binbay M, Yuruk E, Akman T, et al. Is there a difference in outcomes between digital and fiberoptic flexible ureterorenoscopy procedures? J Endourol. 2010; 24:1929-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0211
Cho SY, Choo MS, Jung JH, et al. Cumulative sum analysis for experiences of a single-session retrograde intrarenal stone surgery and analysis of predictors for stone-free status. PloS one. 2014; 9:e84878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084878
Wang L-J, Wong Y-C, Chuang C-K, et al. Predictions of outcomes of renal stones after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy from stone characteristics determined by unenhanced helical computed tomography: a multivariate analysis. Eur Radiol. 2005; 15:2238-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2742-9
El-Nahas AR, El-Assmy AM, et al. A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. Eur Urol. 2007; 51:1688-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.048
Kim JW, Chae JY, Kim JW, et al. Computed tomography-based novel prediction model for the stone-free rate of ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Urolithiasis. 2014; 42:75–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0609-0
Gucuk A, Yilmaz B, Gucuk S, Uyeturk U. Are stone density and location useful parameters that can determine the endourological surgical technique for kidney stones that are smaller than 2 cm? A prospective randomized controlled trial. Urol J. 2019; 16:236-41.
Xiao Y, Li D, Chen L, et al. The R.I.R.S. scoring system: An innovative scoring system for predicting stone-free rate following retrograde intrarenal surgery. BMC Urology. 2017; 17:105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0297-0
Harrington RD, Hooton TM. Urinary tract infection risk factors and gender. The journal of gender-specific medicine: JGSM: the official journal of the Partnership for Women's Health at Columbia. 2000; 3:27-34.
Ito, H, Sakamaki K, Kawahara T, et. al. Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones. BJU International. 2015; 115:446-451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12775
Erbin A, Tepeler A, Buldu I, et al. External comparison of recent predictive nomograms for stone-free rate using retrograde flexible ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2016, 30: 1180-1184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0473
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Downloads
Citations
