Does two-piece PPI provide improvement in patient-partner quality of life?
https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2021.2.237
Accepted: January 2, 2021
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Objective: The aim of this study is to retrospectively examine patient-partner satisfaction and changes in quality of life due to two-piece penile prosthesis implantation (PPI). There is no data about partner Quality of Life (QoL) related to two-piece PPI in the literature.
Material and Methods: SF 36 scale and modified Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS), which were filled before two-piece PPI and at the sixth postoperative month follow-up by male patients (n = 45) and female partners (n = 45), were evaluated.
Results: We found patient-partner satisfaction rates as 80% and 86% respectively. The changes in all mean scores of SF 36 (mean total score, mean physical health score and mean mental health score) were statistically significant (p < 0.01). Again, the differences between all mean scores of SF 36 according to the level of patient-partner satisfaction were statistically significant (p < 0.01).
Conclusions: Two-piece PPI is an important option for ED treatment. It provides significant improvement in patient-partner QoL with high treatment satisfaction.
Hatzimourotidis K, Guiliano F, Moncada I, et al. EAU guidelines on males sexual dysfunction. 2016; p: 14-22.
Gümüs¸ BH, Albaz AC. Erektil disfonksiyon tedavisinde penil protez implantasyonun uzun dönem klinik sonuçları. Androl Bul. 2017; 19:117-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24898/tandro.2017.54771
Efesoy O, Özbay E, Tek M, et al. Longterm outcomes and couple’s satisfaction with three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Türkiye klinikleri J MedSci, 2010; 30:1965-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5336/medsci.2009-14125
Levine LA, Estrada CR, Morgentaler A. Mechanical reliability andsafety of and patient satisfaction with the Ambicor inflatable penileprosthesis: results of a 2 center study. J Urol. 2001; 166: 932-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65867-3
Barton GJ, Carlos EC, Lentz AC. Sexual quality of life and satisfaction with penile prosthesis. Sex Med Rev. 2019; 7:178-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.10.003
Newman SP. Psychosocial measures in musculoskeletal trials. J Rheumatol. 1997; 24:979-84.
Ure I, Ozen A, Can C. Life quality change after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. Aging Male. 2020; 23:362-368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13685538.2018.1487393
Chierigo F, Capogrosso P, Dehò F, et al. Long-term follow-up after penile prosthesis implantation-survival and quality of life outcomes. J Sex Med. 2019;16:1827-1833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.08.001
Morey AF. Re: Ambicor 2-piece inflatable penile prosthesis: who and how? J Urol. 2018; 200:691-692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.044
Ozan T, Karakeçi A, Pirinçci A, et al. Iki parçalı sisirilebilir penil protez cerrahisine ait klinik sonuçlar ve hasta memnuniyetinin degerlendirilmesi. F.Ü.Sag.Bil.Tıp.Derg. 2018; 32:27-30.
Usta MF. Penil protez cerrahisinde yenilikler: 2016 güncelleme. Androloji bülteni. 2016; 18 :212-216.
Esengen S, Nalbant I, Öztürk U, et al. Comparison of penile prosthesis methods: which is more successful? J Clin Anal Med. 2017; 8:421-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4328/JCAM.4922
Küçük E, Bindayı A. Penil protez cerrahisi komplikasyonları ve basaçıkma yöntemleri. And Bült. 2016; 18:25-29.
Zacharakis E, Garaffa G, Raheem A et al. Penile prosthes insertion in patients with refractory ischaemic priapism: early vs delayed implantation. BJU Int 2014; 114:576-581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12686
Barrett-Harlow B, Clavell-Hernandez J, Wang R. New developments in surgical treatment for penile size preservation in Peyronie’s disease. Sex Med Rev. 2019; 7:156-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.07.001
Mulcahy JJ. Current approach to the treatment of penile implant infections. Ther Adv Urol. 2010; 2:69-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287210370330
Mellon MJ, Broghammer JR, Henry GD. The Mulcahy Salvage: Past and Present Innovations. J Sex Med. 2015; 12 (Suppl 7):432-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12986
Salama N. Satisfaction with the malleable penile prosthesis among the couples from the Middle East- is it different from that reported elsewhere ? Int J Impo Res. 2004; 16:175-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901150
Özbay E, Aydın A, Salar R, et al. Sexual experiences between partners after penile prosthesis: Who is more satisfied? Andrologia. 2020; 52:e13461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/and.13461
Lux M, Reyes-Vallejo L, Morgentaler A, Levine LA. Outcomes and satisfaction rates for the redesigned 2-piece penile prosthesis. J Urol. 2007; 177:262-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.094
Çayan S, Ascı R, Efesoy O, et al. Comparison of long-term results and couples’s satisfaction with penile implant types and brands: lessons learned from 883 patients with erectile dysfunction who underwent penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med. 2019; 16:1092-1099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.04.013
Carvalheira A, Santana R, Pereira NM. Why are men satisfied or dissatisfied with penile implants? A mixed method study on satisfaction with penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med. 2015; 12:2474-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.13054
Caraceni E, Utizi L. Questionnaire for the evaluation of quality of life after penile prosthesis implant: Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis (QoLSPP). To what extent does the implant affect the patient’s life? J Sex Med 2014; 11:1005-1012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12453
Buster JE. Managing female sexual dysfunction. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100:905-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.08.026
Tutoglu A, Boyaci A, Koca I, et al. Quality of life, depression, and sexual dysfunction in spouses of female patients with fibromyalgia. Rheumatol Int. 2014; 34:1079-1084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-014-2944-z
Bilgic D, Gokyildiz S, Kizilkaya Beji N, et al. Quality of life and sexual functıon in obese women with pelvic floor dysfunction. Women Health. 2019; 59:101-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2018.1492497
Radoja I, Degmecic D. Quality of life and female sexual dysfunction in Croatian women with stress-, urgency- and mixed urinary incontinence: results of a cross-sectional study. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019; 55:240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55060240
Nappi RE, Cucinella L, Martella S, et al. Female sexual dysfunction (FSD): prevalence and impact on quality of life (QoL). Maturitas. 2016; 94:87-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.09.013
Basson R. Female sexual dysfunction in hypopituitarism. Lancet. 2007; 70(9589):737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61368-3
Basson R. Sexuality in chronic illness: no longer ignored. Lancet. 2007; 369(9559):350-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60166-4
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Downloads
Citations
