The role of the multi-disciplinary team and multi-disciplinary therapeutic protocol in the management of the chronic pelvic pain: There is strenght in numbers!


Submitted: January 10, 2021
Accepted: February 15, 2021
Published: June 28, 2021
Abstract Views: 1499
PDF: 712
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Introduction: The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a Multi-disciplinary team (MDT) and multi-disciplinary approach in the treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain (CPP).
Methods: The data of all consecutive patients referred for a CPP from 11/2016 to 2/2019 has been prospectively collected. The sample was divided in two groups: Group A, made by patients managed after the institution of our MDT, and Group B, made of patients managed before this date. The MDT is composed by three urogynecologists, a psychologist and a physiotherapist. All Group A patients underwent a weekly bladder instillation with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), kinesiotherapy for trigger points and Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for 10 consecutive weeks. Patients were asked to perform a self-treatment following the Stanford Protocol and to adhere to a specific diet. All Group B patients were managed only with DMSO instillations and a strict diet.
Results: The Group A was made of 41 females and 6 males while the Group B was made of 38 females and 5 males. The Group A patients showed a statistically significant improvement in the Pelvic Pain Urgency Frequency, in the frequency times reported at the 6 months voiding diary, and a better Patient Global Impression of Improvement.
Conclusions: Our data support the efficacy of the MDT in the management of CPP. The multimodal approach might represent an effective and reproducible non-invasive option to manage successfully CPP.


Wozniak S. Chronic pelvic pain. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2016;23:223-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/12321966.1203880

Gambadauro P, Carli V, Hadlaczky G. Depressive symptoms among women with endometriosis: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 220:230-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.123

Polackwich AS, Shoskes DA. Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a review of evaluation and therapy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016; 19:132-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2016.8

Stamatiou K, Magri V, Perletti G, et al. How urologists deal with chronic prostatitis? The preliminary results of a Mediterranean survey. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2020; 92:353-356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2020.4.353

Mahran A, Baaklini G, Hassani D, et al. Sacral neuromodulation treating chronic pelvic pain: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J. 2019; 30:1023-1035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03898-w

Possover M, Andersson KE, Forman A. Neuropelveology: An emerging discipline for the management of chronic pelvic pain. Int Neurourol J. 2017; 21:243-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.1735036.518

Nikkola J, Holm A, Seppänen M, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A prospective pilot study. Int Neurourol J. 2020; 24:144-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.1938258.129

Lin CC, Huang YC, Lee WC, Chuang YC. New frontiers or the treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome - focused on stem cells, platelet-rich plasma, and low-energy shock wave. Int Neurourol J. 2020; 24:211-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.2040104.052

Berghmans B. Physiotherapy for pelvic pain and female sexual dysfunction: an untapped resource. Int Urogynecol J. 2018; 29:631-638.

Clemens JQ, Mullins C, Ackerman AL, et al. MAPP Research Network Study Group. Urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome: insights from the MAPP Research Network. Nat Rev Urol. 2019; 16:187-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-018-0135-5

Engeler D, Baranowski AP, Berghmans B, et al. EAU 2020 Guidelines on Chronic Pelvic Pain. European Association of Urology, 2020 – www.uroweb.org

Magri V, Boltri M, Cai T, et al. Multidiscplinary approach to prostatitis.Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2019; 90:227-248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2018.4.227

Anderson RU, Wise D, Sawyer T, et al. Equal improvement in men and women in the treatment of urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome using a multi-modal protocol with an internal myofascial trigger point wand. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2016; 41:215-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-015-9325-6

Sammarco AG, Kobernik EK, Haefner HK, et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms in a chronic pelvic pain population. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jan 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000689

Guan Y, Yu G, Wang G, Bai Z. The negative effect of urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome on female sexual function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2019; 30:1807-1816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03984-z

Berghmans B. Physiotherapy for pelvic pain and female sexual dysfunction: an untapped resource. Int Urogynecol J. 2018; 29:631-638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3536-8

Ambrosini F, Di Stasio A, Mantica G, et al. COVID-19 pandemic and uro-oncology follow-up: A "virtual" multidisciplinary team strategy and patients' satisfaction assessment. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2020; 92:78-79 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2020.2.78

Pillay B, Wootten AC, Crowe H, et al. The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: A systematic review of the literature. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;42:56-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.11.007

Brendbekken R, Harris A, Ursin H, et al. Multidisciplinary Intervention in Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain: a Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Behav Med. 2016; 23:1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-015-9486-y

Coppack RJ, Bilzon JL, Wills AK, et al. A comparison of multidisciplinary team residential rehabilitation with conventional outpatient care for the treatment of non-arthritic intra-articular hip pain in UK Military personnel - a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016; 17:459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1309-z

Sahai-Srivastava S, Sigman E, Uyeshiro Simon A, et al. Multidisciplinary Team Treatment Approaches to Chronic Daily Headaches. Headache. 2017; 57:1482-1491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13118

Gupta P, Gaines N, Sirls LT, Peters KM. A multidisciplinary approach to the evaluation and management of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: an ideal model of care. Transl Androl Urol. 2015; 4:611-9.

Baranowski AP, Mandeville AL, Edwards S, et al. Male chronic pelvic pain syndrome and the role of interdisciplinary pain management. World J Urol. 2013; 31:779-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1083-6

Allaire C, Williams C, Bodmer-Roy S, et al. Chronic pelvic pain in an interdisciplinary setting: 1-year prospective cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218:114.e1-114.e12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.002

Twiddy H, Lane N, Chawla R, et al. The development and delivery of a female chronic pelvic pain management programme: a specialised interdisciplinary approach. Br J Pain. 2015; 9:233-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2049463715584408

Lillemon JN, Nardos R, Kaul MP, et al. Complex female pelvic pain: a case series from a multidisciplinary clinic in urogynecology and physiatry. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019; 25:e34-e39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000662

Centemero, A., Rigatti, L., Giraudo, D., Mantica, G., De Marchi, D., Chiarulli, E. F., & Gaboardi, F. (2021). The role of the multi-disciplinary team and multi-disciplinary therapeutic protocol in the management of the chronic pelvic pain: There is strenght in numbers!. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 93(2), 211–214. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2021.2.211

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations