https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2026.15821
WhatsApp-assisted telemedicine for ureteral stone management: a pilot study
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Accepted: 20 July 2026
Published: 25 September 2026
Background: Telemedicine has gained increasing importance in urology, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, enabling remote patient monitoring and reducing hospital visits. To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of a WhatsApp-based telemedicine follow-up model in patients with ureteral stones managed conservatively.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between March and May 2020. Ninety-nine patients with a single ureteral stone < 10 mm were included. All patients received medical expulsive therapy and were followed for 30 days using a structured WhatsApp-based monitoring system. Pain scores, analgesic use, stone passage, complications, and patient satisfaction were recorded.
Results: The median age was 55 years, and the mean stone size was 6.1 ± 1.5 mm. Spontaneous stone passage occurred in 34.3% of patients, while 26.2% required JJ stent placement. Larger stone size (p < 0.001) and proximal location (p = 0.002) were associated with intervention. Pain scores and analgesic requirements decreased significantly over time (p < 0.01). No major complications were observed. WhatsApp-based monitoring enabled timely clinical decision-making and reduced unnecessary hospital visits.
Conclusions: WhatsApp-assisted telemedicine is a feasible, safe, and cost-effective approach for managing ureteral stones. Larger prospective studies are required to validate these findings.
Downloads
1. Petruzzi M, De Benedittis M. WhatsApp: a telemedicine platform for facilitating remote oral medicine consultation and improving clinical examinations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016; 121:248-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2015.11.005
2. Haleem A, Javaid M, Singh RP, Suman R. Telemedicine for healthcare: Capabilities, features, barriers, and applications. Sens Int. 2021; 2:100117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100117
3. Symeonidis EN, Veneziano D, Borgmann H, et al. Telemedicine in Urology: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Heading? Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023; 50:106-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2023.02.005
4. Talyshinskii A, Naik N, Hameed BMZ, et al. Telemedicine in Endourology for Patient Management and Healthcare Delivery: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Curr Urol Rep. 2024; 25:299-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-024-01224-6
5. Johnston MJ, King D, Arora S, et al. Smartphones let surgeons know WhatsApp: an analysis of communication in emergency surgical teams. Am J Surg. 2015; 209:45-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.08.030
6. Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, et al. 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol. 2007; 178:2418-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.107
7. Novara G, Checcucci E, Crestani A, et al. Telehealth in Urology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. How Much Can Telemedicine Be Useful During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic? Eur Urol. 2020; 78:786-811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.025
8. Mechanic OJ, Persaud Y, Kimball AB. Telehealth Systems. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL)2025.
9. Field MJ, Grigsby J. Telemedicine and remote patient monitoring. JAMA. 2002; 288:423-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.4.423
10. Giordano V, Koch H, Godoy-Santos A, et al. WhatsApp Messenger as an Adjunctive Tool for Telemedicine: An Overview. Interact J Med Res. 2017; 6:e11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.6214
11. Montag C, Blaszkiewicz K, Sariyska R, et al. Smartphone usage in the 21st century: who is active on WhatsApp? BMC Res Notes. 2015; 8:331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1280-z
12. Hughes T, Pietropaolo A, Archer M, et al. Lessons Learnt (Clinical Outcomes and Cost Savings) from Virtual Stone Clinic and Their Application in the Era Post-COVID-19: Prospective Outcomes over a 6-Year Period from a University Teaching Hospital. J Endourol. 2021; 35:200-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0708
13. Connor MJ, Miah S, Edison MA, et al. Clinical, fiscal and environmental benefits of a specialist-led virtual ureteric colic clinic: a prospective study. BJU Int. 2019; 124:1034-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14847
14. Ong CSH, Lu J, Tan YQ, et al. Implementation of a Ureteric Colic Telemedicine Service: A Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Study. Urology. 2021; 147:14-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.10.010
15. Shah TT, Gao C, Peters M, et al. Factors associated with spontaneous stone passage in a contemporary cohort of patients presenting with acute ureteric colic: results from the Multi-centre cohort study evaluating the role of Inflammatory Markers In patients presenting with acute ureteric Colic (MIMIC) study. BJU Int. 2019; 124:504-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14777
16. Coll DM, Varanelli MJ, Smith RC. Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 178:101-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.178.1.1780101
17. Yallappa S, Amer T, Jones P, et al. Natural History of Conservatively Managed Ureteral Stones: Analysis of 6600 Patients. J Endourol. 2018; 32:371-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0848
CRediT authorship contribution
RBE: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft, Data Analysis. MFO and IT: Data Analysis, Writing – Review & Editing. SB and EC: Data Collection, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing. APL: Critical Review. TES and LD: Manuscript Revision. TT: Supervision. All the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Supporting Agencies
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting this study's findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.