https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2026.15702
Beyond survival: addressing sexual health in advanced prostate cancer care
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 29 July 2026
Dear Editor,
The therapeutic landscape of prostate cancer (PCa) has changed considerably over the last decade, with clear improvements in diagnosis, including PSMA PET and fusion biopsies, treatment options, and survival. Consequently, a growing number of patients are now living longer after their PCa initial diagnosis, and increasing attention is progressively shifting toward long-term quality of life. In Italy, men living after a diagnosis of prostate cancer increased from 217,000 in 2014 to 485,000 in 2024, with a five-year survival rate of approximately 91% [...].
Downloads
1. De Nunzio C, Lombardo R, Baldassarri V, et al. Rotterdam mobile phone app including MRI data for the prediction of prostate cancer: A multicenter
external validation. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021; 47 :2640-2645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.033
2. Bauckneht M, Rebuzzi SE, Ponzano M, et al. Prognostic Value of the BIO-Ra Score in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients
Treated with Radium-223 after the European Medicines Agency Restricted Use: Secondary Investigations of the Multicentric BIO-Ra Study.
Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14:1744.
3. Mantica G, Pacchetti A, Aimar R, et al. Developing a five-step training model for transperineal prostate biopsies in a naïve residents' group:
a prospective observational randomised study of two different techniques. World J Urol. 2019; 37:1845-1850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2599-6
4. Brant A, Campi R, Carrion DM, et al. Findings from an international survey of urology trainee experience with prostate biopsy. BJU Int. 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003253.17
131:705-711.
5. MacLennan S, Azevedo N, Duncan E, et al. Mapping European Association of Urology Guideline Practice Across Europe: An Audit of
Androgen Deprivation Therapy Use Before Prostate Cancer Surgery in 6598 Cases in 187 Hospitals Across 31 European Countries. Eur Urol.
2023; 83:393-401.
6. De Marchi D, Mantica G, Tafuri A, Giusti G, Gaboardi F. Robotic surgery in urology: a review from the beginning to the single-site. AME Med
J 2022; 7:16.
7. Hyun JS. Sexual function in men with prostate cancer. World J Mens Health. 2012; 30:99-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.2012.30.2.99
8. AIOM, AIRTUM, Fondazione AIOM, PASSI, PASSI d’Argento, SIAPeC-IAP. I numeri del cancro in Italia 2024. Milano: Associazione Italiana
di Oncologia Medica; 2024. Available from: AIOM official report
9. Mainwaring JM, Walker LM, Robinson JW, Wassersug RJ, Wibowo E. The psychosocial consequences of prostate cancer treatments on body
image, sexuality, and relationships. Front Psychol. 2021; 12:765315.
10. Paterson CL, Lengacher CA, Donovan KA, Kip KE, Tofthagen CS. Body image in younger breast cancer survivors: a systematic review.
Cancer Nurs. 2016; 39:E39-E58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000251
11. Zambudio-Munuera A, Millán-Ramos I, Rodríguez-Parras P, et al. Early risk stratification after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the role
of positive surgical margins. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2026; 98:14871.
12. Nicolai M, Urkmez A, Sarikaya S, Fode M. Penile Rehabilitation and Treatment Options for Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical
Prostatectomy and Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review. Front Surg. 2021; 8:636974.
13. Donovan KA, Walker LM, Wassersug RJ, et al. The impact of androgen deprivation therapy on sexual function and bother in men with
prostate cancer. J Sex Med. 2017.
14. Mazzola CR, Mulhall JP. Impact of androgen deprivation therapy on sexual function. Asian J Androl. 2012; 14:198-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2011.106
15. De Rose AF, Gallo F, Mantica G, et al. Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative results after tricomponent penile prosthesis implantation
under spinal versus local anaesthesia. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2026
CRediT authorship contribution
Aldo Franco De Rose: Conceptualization, supervision, writing – review and editing. Sara Ciuffarella: Literature review, writing – original draft preparation. Fabrizio Gallo: Writing – review and editing. Guglielmo Mantica: Conceptualization, supervision, writing – review and editing.
Supporting Agencies
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.