Original Papers - Oncology

Exploring the efficacy of the storage organizational model in the urology suite at a single institution

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 28 February 2026
Published: 29 May 2026
43
Views
17
Downloads

Authors

Purpose: The growing use of disposable equipment in operating rooms (ORs) underscores the need for efficient storage systems that ensure reliable access while minimizing waste. Multiple organizational models exist, including open rack storage, Omnicell cabinets, and PAR Excellence weight-based scales. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the current storage model in the urology suite at a single academic institution.

Methods: We first identified the storage systems used in the operating rooms (OR) and Omnicell storage room in the urology suite. We then obtained stored item data from our Supply Chain manager, containing quantities of each item and costs. Using our medical record system, EPIC, we kept track of the frequency of use for each stored item in academic year 2022-2023. Also, during this time, the PI surgeon and OR staff made note of any unavailable or expired equipment.

Results: At our institution, we use a combination of open rack and Omnicell storage. From August-September 2022, there were 3 out-of-stock items noted. In April 2023, there were 7 expired items noted. Of the 237 different disposable items stocked, 117 (49.37%) were unused over the study year, accounting for $21,812.26 (15.98%) of total on-hand inventory cost.

Conclusions: The current organizational system demonstrated notable inefficiencies, including unavailable equipment, expired items, and substantial cost tied to unused supplies. These challenges highlight the limitations of manual or partially automated storage models and emphasize the need for more reliable, datadriven systems. Institutions may benefit from reevaluating their storage workflows to improve equipment availability, reduce waste, and support more sustainable financial and clinical practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

1. Eussen MMM, Moossdorff M, Wellens LM, et al. Beyond singleuse: a systematic review of environmental, economic, and clinical impacts of endoscopic surgical instrumentation. Int J Surg. 2024; 110:8136-8150.

2. Croffie J, Carpenter S, Chuttani R, et al. ASGE Technology Status Evaluation Report: disposable endoscopic accessories. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 62:477-479.

3. Thompson DR, Hamilton DK, Cadenhead CD, et al. Guidelines for intensive care unit design. Crit Care Med. 2012; 40:1586-1600.

4. Wheeler C, Blencowe A, Jacklin A, Franklin BD. Combining research and design: A mixed methods approach aimed at understanding and optimising inpatient medication storage systems. PLoS One. 2021; 16:e0260197.

5. When will getting the right medication to the right patient get easier? Omnicell. Accessed February 27, 2026. https://www.omnicell.me/globalassets/int-blocks-media/ukwebsite/brochures/uk_xt_adc_brochure.pdf

6. PAR Vision. PAR Vision User Guide. Accessed December 6, 2025. https://www.oit.va.gov/Services/TRM/files/PAR_Vision_User_Guide.pdf

7. Inventory Automation – PAR Excellence. PAR Excellence. Published 2026. Accessed February 27, 2026. https://parexcellence.com/inventory-management/inventory-automation.

8. Efthymiou CA, Cale AR. Implications of equipment failure occurring during surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2022; 104:678-684.

9. Cunningham AJ, Krakauer K, Schofield C, Kenron D, Krishnaswami S. Reducing Disposable Surgical Items: Decreasing Environmental Impact and Costs at a Children's Hospital, a Pilot Study. J Surg Res. 2023;288:309-314.

10. Shrank WH, Rogstad TL, Parekh N. Waste in the US Health Care System: Estimated Costs and Potential for Savings. JAMA. 2019;322:1501-1509.

11-Namburar S, von Renteln D, Damianos J, et al. Estimating the environmental impact of disposable endoscopic equipment and endoscopes. Gut. 2022; 71:1326-1331.

12. Hartman M, Martin AB, Whittle L, Catlin A; National Health Expenditure Accounts Team. National Health Care Spending In 2022: Growth Similar To Prepandemic Rates. Health Aff (Millwood). 2024; 43:6-17.

CRediT authorship contribution

JG: Conceptualization, data interpretation, methodology, writing-original draft preparation. RS: Data interpretation, writing-review & editing. MAC:  Data interpretation, methodology, writing-review & editing.  JAB:  Conceptualization, methodology, writing-review & editing, Supervision.

Supporting Agencies

None

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

How to Cite



Exploring the efficacy of the storage organizational model in the urology suite at a single institution. (2026). Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2026.14992