https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2026.14989
Does the use of a small-diameter 22Fr resectoscope sheath reduce urethral stricture after transurethral resection of the prostate?
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 8 May 2026
Purpose: Urethral stricture represents a significant late complication of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), leading to deterioration in urinary function and quality of life. This study aimed to compare the impact of 22Fr and 26Fr continuous-flow resectoscope sheaths on postoperative urethral stricture formation and perioperative outcomes.
Methods: Patients who underwent bipolar TURP between 2021 and 2025 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided according to sheath size into 22Fr (n = 135) and 26Fr (n = 145) groups. The primary endpoint was postoperative urethral stricture. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model with Firth’s penalized likelihood correction was used to identify independent predictors of stricture. Stricture-free survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test.
Results: Urethral stricture occurred in 5 patients (3.7%) in the 22Fr group and 22 patients (15.2%) in the 26Fr group (p = 0.0011). Operation time was shorter in the 26Fr group, while functional outcomes were comparable between groups. In multivariable Firth’s penalized Cox regression analysis, use of a 26Fr sheath was the only independent predictor of urethral stricture (adjusted HR 4.08; 95% CI 1.16–14.37; p = 0.029). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significantly higher cumulative incidence of urethral stricture in the 26Fr group (log-rank p = 0.003).
Conclusions: Use of a 22Fr resectoscope sheath is associated with a significantly lower hazard of postoperative urethral stricture without compromising functional outcomes. Sheath diameter represents a clinically relevant and modifiable technical factor that may significantly influence long-term urethral morbidity after TURP.
Downloads
1) European Association of Urology. EAU guidelines. 2024 ed. Arnhem: European Association of Urology; 2024.
2) Khalil MAU, Abbasi S, Nawaz R, et al. Therapeutic efficacy and complication profile of monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the management of bladder outlet obstruction. Cureus 2025;17:e89640.
3) Wessells H, Morey A, Souter L, et al. Urethral stricture disease guideline amendment (2023). J Urol 2023;210:64-71.
4) Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, et al. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)--incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol 2006;50:969-79.
5) Payne SR, Anderson P, Spasojević N, et al. Male urethral stricture disease: why management guidelines are challenging in low-income countries. BJU Int 2022;130:157-65.
6) Tao H, Jiang YY, Jun Q, et al. Analysis of risk factors leading to postoperative urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture following transurethral resection of prostate. Int Braz J Urol 2016;42:302-11.
7) Günes M, Keles MO, Kaya C, et al. Does resectoscope size play a role in formation of urethral stricture following transurethral prostate resection? Int Braz J Urol 2015;41:744-9.
8) Mannem SR, Mallikarjuna C, Bhavatej E, et al. Incidence of urethral stricture following bipolar transurethral resection of prostate: a single-center study. Indian J Urol 2022;38:146-50.
9) Komura K, Inamoto T, Takai T, et al. Incidence of urethral stricture after bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate using TURis: results from a randomised trial. BJU Int 2015;115:644-52.
10) Taha T, Savin Z, Lifshitz K, et al. Mini-HoLEP (MILEP) vs HoLEP: a propensity score-matched analysis. World J Urol 2023;41:2801-7.
11) Schmidt J, Ralla B, Maxeiner A, et al. Minimally invasive holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (MiLEP) vs HoLEP: retrospective analysis of perioperative outcomes in a propensity score-matched cohort. Prostate 2025;85:1299-306.
12) Pirola GM, Castellani D, Lim EJ, et al. Urethral stricture following endoscopic prostate surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective, randomized trials. World J Urol 2022;40:1391-411.
13) Sekar H, Palaniyandi V, Krishnamoorthy S, et al. Post-transurethral resection of prostate urethral strictures: are they often underreported? Urol Ann 2021;13:329-35.
14) Afandiyev F, Ugurlu O. Factors predicting the development of urethral stricture after bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2022;68:50-55.
15) Kurtzman JT, Blum R, Brandes SB. Lower urinary tract stenosis following surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Curr Urol Rep 2021;22:55.
16) Akpala A, Warda A, Batson-Patel S, et al. Comparing urethral stricture rates following bipolar and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a retrospective study. Cureus 2024;16:e73548.
17) Licari LC, Bologna E, Manfredi C, et al. Incidence and management of BPH surgery-related urethral stricture: results from a large U.S. database. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024;27:537-43.
18) Liao RS, Stern E, Wright JE, et al. Contemporary management of bulbar urethral strictures. Rev Urol 2020;22:139-51.
19) Chen F, Chen Y, Zou Y, et al. Comparison of holmium laser enucleation and transurethral resection of prostate in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Med Res 2023;51:3000605231190763.
20) Elsaqa M, Serag M, Leenlani N, et al. The incidence of urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture with transurethral resection vs. holmium laser enucleation of prostate: a matched, dual-center study. Can Urol Assoc J 2023;17:E35-E38.
21) Grechenkov A, Sukhanov R, Bezrukov E, et al. Risk factors for urethral stricture and/or bladder neck contracture after monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urologia 2018;85:150-57.
22) Adhoni MZU, Haider M, Somani BK. Does miniaturisation improve holmium laser enucleation of prostate outcomes? Cent European J Urol 2025;78:151-64.
CRediT authorship contribution
A.S.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – Original Draft.
G.E.: Data curation, Writing – Review & Editing.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to patient confidentiality but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.