https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2026.14945
Prognostic significance of pretreatment hydronephrosis in radiotherapy-based bladder-preserving strategies for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 29 May 2026
Introduction & objectives: Radiotherapybased bladder-preserving strategies are established alternatives to radical cystectomy for selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), yet survival outcomes remain heterogeneous and prognostic stratification is imprecise. Pretreatment hydronephrosis has shown adverse prognostic associations in cystectomy and trimodality therapy cohorts, but its impact across the broader spectrum of radiotherapy-based bladder preservation is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the prognostic significance of pretreatment hydronephrosis on survival outcomes in MIBC patients treated with radiotherapy-based bladder-preserving strategies.
Materials & methods: The study was designed as a systematic review with quantitative synthesis, structured around a predefined PICO framework. The protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261305703). Eligible studies included observational cohorts and clinical trials enrolling adults with MIBC treated with definitive radiotherapy-based bladder preservation, including radiotherapy alone, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, or trimodality therapy. Searches of PubMed, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Wiley Online Library were performed from January 2000 to December 2025. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I and study quality with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Time-to-event outcomes were extracted as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), prioritizing multivariable-adjusted estimates. Evidence synthesis was performed using random-effects models with inverse-variance weighting of log-transformed HRs according to the DerSimonian-Laird method.
Results: Forty-two studies comprising 8,586 participants met the inclusion criteria. Pretreatment hydronephrosis was significantly associated with inferior overall survival (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.43- 1.91; I² 29.8%). This adverse effect was consistent across treatment modalities, including definitive chemoradiotherapy (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.30-2.32; I² 34%), radiotherapy alone (HR 1.65, 95% CI 0.38-7.19; I² 0%), and trimodality therapy (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.25-2.14; I² 39.6%), with no evidence of subgroup interaction (p = 0.93). Hydronephrosis was also associated with worse cancer-specific survival (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.68-2.37; I² 8.9%). Disease control endpoints were consistently inferior in patients with hydronephrosis, including disease-free survival (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.12-3.01; I² 48.7%), progression-free survival (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.02-2.49; I² 0%), and metastasis-free survival (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.32-1.84; I² 0%). The overall risk of bias across included studies was predominantly moderate.
Conclusions: Pretreatment hydronephrosis is a robust, treatmentindependent adverse prognostic factor in radiotherapy-based bladder-preserving management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer, conferring consistently increased hazards for mortality and disease progression across all major oncologic endpoints. Its presence should be systematically integrated into baseline prognostic stratification, patient counseling, and risk-adapted surveillance strategies in bladder-preserving treatment paradigms.
Downloads
1. Gupta S, Hensley PJ, Li R, et al. Bladder preservation strategies in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: recommendations from the International Bladder Cancer Group. Eur Urol 2026; 89:18-28.
2. Su X, Dong C, Liao W, et al. Oncological effectiveness of bladder preserving trimodal therapy versus radical cystectomy for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2023; 21:271.
3. Grabenbauer F, Flentje M. Organerhaltende Therapie des muskelinvasiven Blasenkarzinoms: 10-Jahres-Daten der britischen BC2001-Studie. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:425-7.
4. Al-Qudimat AR, Singh K, Ojha LK, et al. Comparing trimodal therapy with radical cystectomy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an updated meta-analysis. Front Surg 2023; 10:1276746.
5. Oh JJ, Byun SS, Jeong CW, et al. Association between preoperative hydronephrosis and prognosis after radical cystectomy among patients with bladder cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2019; 9:158.
6. Zhu Z, Zhao J, Li Y, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative hydronephrosis in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0222223.
7. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012; 22:276-82.
8. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010; 25:603-605.
9. Warli SM, Sihombing B, Kadar DD, et al. Comparison of longterm survival for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients who underwent bladder preservation therapy and radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urologia 2025; 92:585-94.
10. Ye T, Yang X, Lv P, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative hydronephrosis in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urinary carcinoma: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Front Oncol 2020; 10:600511.
11. Kikuchi K, Ota I, Segawa T, et al. Survival outcomes and prognostic factors in bladder cancer treated with radiotherapy. J Radiat Res 2025; 66:272-9.
12. McPherson VA, Rodrigues G, Bauman G, et al. Chemoradiotherapy in octogenarians as primary treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Can Urol Assoc J 2017; 11:24-30.
13. Hafeez S, Horwich A, Omar O, et al. Selective organ preservation with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of muscle invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Br J Cancer 2015;112:1626-35.
14. Chang YC, Wu YY, Tsan DL, et al. Dose-escalated radiation therapy as primary treatment for residual bladder cancer after transurethral resection. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101302.
15. Zhao H, Jiao B, Liu K, et al. Intravesical recurrence factors and outcome after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: multivariate analysis with propensity score matching. Front Oncol 2022; 12:984014.
16. Gofrit ON, Meirovitz A, Frank S, et al. Trimodal therapy in T2- 4aN0M0 bladder cancer--how to select the best candidate? Cancer Med 2020; 9:8491-7.
17. Saito T, Matsumoto K, Tanaka N, et al. Prognostic impact of tumor ureteral invasion on recurrence after radical cystectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 2024; 56:129-35.
18. Efstathiou JA, Spiegel DY, Shipley WU, et al. Long-term outcomes of selective bladder preservation by combined-modality therapy for invasive bladder cancer: the MGH experience. Eur Urol 2012;61:705-11.
19. Mak RH, Hunt D, Shipley WU, et al. Long-term outcomes in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer after selective bladderpreserving combined-modality therapy: a pooled analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocols 8802, 8903, 9506, 9706, 9906, and 0233. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:3801-9.
20. Wu CE, Lin YC, Hong JH, et al. Prognostic value of complete response in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Anticancer Res 2013; 33:2605-10.
21. de Ruiter BM, van de Kamp MW, van Steenbergen JPZ, et al. A multicenter retrospective cohort series of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy in daily practice. Eur Urol Open Sci 2022; 39:7-13.
22. Yeh HC, Chang CH, Fang JK, et al. The value of preoperative local symptoms in prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after. radical nephroureterectomy: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:872849.
23. MacIntyre I, Kool R, Marcq G, et al. Effect of sex differences on cancer outcomes after chemo-radiation for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. Urology 2025;205:121-8.
24. Miyata H, Osawa T, Abe T, et al. The updated outcomes of bladder- preserving trimodal therapy using a real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy system for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2020; 50:609-16.
25. Kotha NV, Kumar A, Nelson TJ, et al. Treatment discontinuation in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing chemoradiation. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100836.
26. Nguyen EK, Yu H, Pond G, et al. Outcomes of trimodality bladder- sparing therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Can Urol Assoc J 2020; 14:122-9.
27. Fokdal L, Høyer M, von der Maase H. Treatment outcome and prognostic variables for local control and survival in patients receiving radical radiotherapy for urinary bladder cancer. Acta Oncol 2004;43:749-57.
28. Hashine K, Kusuhara Y, Miura N, et al. Bladder preservation therapy conducted by intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2009; 39:381-6.
29. Zapatero A, Martin de Vidales C, Arellano R, et al. Updated results of bladder-sparing trimodality approach for invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2010; 28:368-74.
30. Tunio MA, Hashmi A, Qayyum A, et al. Outcome of trimodality protocol for invasive bladder cancer patients at Karachi, Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc 2011; 61:874-9.
31. Inoue M, Koga F, Yoshida S, et al. Significance of ERBB2 overexpression in therapeutic resistance and cancer-specific survival in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients treated with chemoradiation-
based selective bladder-sparing approach. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 90:303-11.
32. Shilkrut M, Wu A, Thomas DG, et al. Expression of ribonucleoside reductase subunit M1, but not excision repair cross-complementation group 1, is predictive in muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with chemotherapy and radiation. Mol Clin Oncol 2014; 2:479-87.
33. Teo MTW, Dyrskjøt L, Nsengimana J, et al. Next-generation. sequencing identifies germline MRE11A variants as markers of radiotherapy outcomes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Ann Oncol 2014; 25:877-83.
34. Caffo O, Thompson C, De Santis M, et al. Concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a pooled individual data analysis of eight phase I-II trials. Radiother Oncol 2016; 121:193-8.
35. Giacalone NJ, Shipley WU, Clayman RH, et al. Long-term outcomes after bladder-preserving tri-modality therapy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an updated analysis of the Massachusetts General Hospital experience. Eur Urol 2017; 71:952-60.
36. Krasnow RE, Drumm M, Roberts HJ, et al. Clinical outcomes of patients with histologic variants of urothelial cancer treated with trimodality bladder-sparing therapy. Eur Urol 2017; 72:54-60.
37. Christodoulou M, Reeves KJ, Hodgson C, et al. Outcomes of radiosensitisation in elderly patients with advanced bladder cancer. Radiother Oncol 2018; 129:499-506.
38. Jiang DM, Jiang H, Chung PWM, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before bladder-sparing chemoradiotherapy in patients with nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2019; 17:38-45.
39. Matsushita M, Kitakaze H, Okada K, et al. Outcome of bladder preservation using low dose chemoradiation therapy in patients with locally invasive bladder cancer. Jpn J Urol 2018; 109:59-67.
40. Büchser D, Zapatero A, Rogado J, et al. Long-term outcomes and patterns of failure following trimodality treatment with bladder preservation for invasive bladder cancer. Urology 2019; 124:183-90.
41. Meng W, Efstathiou JA, Singh R, et al. MicroRNA biomarkers for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing selective bladder-sparing trimodality treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
2019; 104:197-206.
42. Gergelis KR, Kreofsky CR, Choo CS, et al. Outcomes and profiles of older patients receiving definitive radiation therapy for muscleinvasive bladder cancer at a tertiary medical center. Pract Radiat
Oncol 2020; 10:e378-87.
43. Wu CT, Huang YC, Chen WC, et al. The significance of neutrophil- to-lymphocyte ratio and combined chemoradiotherapy in patients undergoing bladder preservation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:13125-35.
44. Aynaci O, Serdar L, Zengin AY, et al. Bladder preservation with image-guided radiotherapy for elderly patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a single institution experience. Turk J Geriatr 2021; 24:174-84.
45. Fabiano E, Durdux C, Dufour B, et al. Long-term outcomes after bladder-preserving tri-modality therapy for patients with muscleinvasive bladder cancer. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:794-802.
46. Kool R, Marcq G, Shinde-Jadhav S, et al. Role of serum lymphocyte- derived biomarkers in nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients treated with trimodal therapy. Eur Urol Open Sci
2022; 36:26-33.
47. Alati A, Fabiano E, Geiss R, et al. Bladder preservation in older adults with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a retrospective study with concurrent chemotherapy and twice-daily hypofractionated
radiotherapy schedule. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:978-86.
48. Kool R, Marcq G, Breau RH, et al. Radiation-based therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: contemporary outcomes across tertiary centers. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:597-603.
49. Meunier S, Frontczak A, Balssa L, et al. Elevated baseline neutrophil count correlates with worse outcomes in patients with muscleinvasive bladder cancer treated with chemoradiation. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:1886.
50. Mignot F, Fabiano E, Xylinas E, et al. Clinical outcomes of adapted hypofractionated radiotherapy for bladder cancer in elderly patients. BJU Int 2023; 132:56-64.
51. Moore A, Lobaugh SM, Zhang Z, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy (Hypo-RT) for the treatment of localized bladder cancer. Bladder Cancer 2023; 9:141-50.
52. Avolio PP, Kool R, Shayegan B, et al. Effect of complete transurethral resection on oncologic outcomes after radiation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2025; 121:317-24.
53. Cho SW, Lim SH, Kwon GY, et al. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by selective bladder preservation chemoradiotherapy in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: post hoc analysis of two prospective studies. Cancer Res Treat 2024;56:893-7.
54. Miyake M, Iemura Y, Oda Y, et al. Bladder preservation with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: retrospective comparison of three regimens. Bladder 2024; 11:e21200009.
55. Kotha NV, Kumar A, Riviere P, et al. Patterns of failure after definitive trimodality therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2025; 23:102229.
CRediT authorship contribution
RFN conceived and designed the study. RFN and SMW performed the literature search and study selection. RFN and FFP extracted the data, assessed risk of bias, and interpreted the findings. RFN conducted the statistical analyses. RFN drafted the manuscript. SMW and FFP critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Supporting Agencies
Data Availability Statement
All data analyzed in this study were derived from previously published articles and are available within the manuscript and its supplementary materials. The extracted dataset used for meta-analysis is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.