https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2026.14940
Outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a resource-limited setting: a retrospective study
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 31 March 2026
Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard for managing large renal calculi; however, data on its long-term efficacy in resource-limited settings such as Yemen are scarce. We evaluated the outcomes and complications of PCNL surgery in resource limited settings over a nine-year period in a high-volume centre in Ibb City, Yemen.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1,458 patients who underwent PCNL between October 2016 and June 2025. Data included patient demographics, stone characteristics, surgical techniques (standard, mini-PCNL, and supine), and outcomes. The stone-free rate (SFR) was defined as the absence of fragments greater than 4 mm on follow-up imaging at three months. Complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system.
Results: The cohort comprised 763 (52.3%) males and 695 (47.7%) females with a mean age of 43.8±17.5 years (range: 2-87 years). Staghorn calculi were present in 647 cases (44.4%). Prone lower-pole access was the predominant approach (58.2%), with a progressive institutional shift toward mini-PCNL (5.7%), supine PCNL (3.1%), and ultrasound-guided access (1.4%) in later years. The primary stone-free rate after a single session was 76.0%, increasing to a final SFR of 92.6% following auxiliary interventions including repeat PCNL, ureteroscopy (2.8%), ESWL (1.5%), and conservative management of clinically insignificant residual fragments (6.0%). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade III-V) occurred in 1.44% of cases, including colonic perforation (0.41%) and conversion to open surgery (0.62%). Mortality rate was 0.14% (n=2). Minor complications (Grade I-II) affected 17.4% of patients, predominantly postoperative pain (7.3%) and transient fever (5.3%).
Conclusions: This large series demonstrates that PCNL can be performed with high stone-free rates and acceptable morbidity in resource-limited settings despite a high prevalence of complex staghorn calculi. The progressive adoption of miniaturized and supine techniques reflects institutional adaptability and confirms the feasibility of implementing contemporary endourological standards in low-resource environments.
Downloads
1. Vera-Ponce VJ, Sanchez-Tamay NM, Ballena-Caicedo J, et al. Global prevalence of urolithiasis: a meta-analysis accounting for methodological heterogeneity. Front Urol. 2025; 5:1705953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fruro.2025.1705953
2. Skolarikos A, Somani B, Neisius A, et al. Metabolic evaluation and recurrence prevention for urinary stone patients: an EAU guidelines update. Eur Urol. 2024; 86:343-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2024.05.029
3. Hughes T, Ho HC, Pietropaolo A, Somani BK. Guideline of guidelines for kidney and bladder stones. Turk J Urol. 2020; 46:S104-s12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2020.20315
4. Alnadhari I, Abdeljaleel O, Ali O, et al. Comparison between flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath and standard ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy for the management of kidney stone: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol. 2025; 25:115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01799-3
5. Akram M, Jahrreiss V, Skolarikos A, et al. Urological Guidelines for Kidney Stones: Overview and Comprehensive Update. J Clin Med. 2024;13:1114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041114
6. Pearle MS, Matlaga BR, Antonelli JA, et al. Surgical Management of kidney and ureteral stones: AUA Guideline (2026). Part II: evaluation and treatment of patients with kidney and/or ureteral stones. J Urol. 2026; 215:124-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004843
7. Salah MA, Tóth C, Khan AM, Holman E. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: experience with 138 cases in a developing country. World J Urol. 2004; 22:277-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-004-0454-4
8. Holman E, Khan AM, Flasko T, et al. Endoscopic management of pediatric urolithiasis in a developing country. Urology. 2004;63:159-62; discussion 62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.08.043
9. Eslahi A, Hosseini MM, Ahmed F, et al. Totally ultrasound-guided minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: Is it safe? Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2022; 19:68-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ajps.AJPS_13_21
10. Eslahi A, Ahmed F, Hosseini MM, et al. Minimal invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) in children: Ultrasound versus fluoroscopic guidance. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2021; 93:173-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2021.2.173
11. Hosseini S. Supine versus prone positioning in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective cohort study comparing intraoperative hemodynamic and respiratory stability. Nephro-Urology Monthly. 2026;18:e166868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly-166868
12. Bokhari AA, Aldarwish HA, Alsanea SA, et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Urolithiasis Among the Population of Hail, Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2022; 14:e26983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26983
13. Alhakamy M, AlShoaibi I, Abdo B, et al. Prevalence of urolithiasis in adults of the Eastern Mediterranean region: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urological Science. 2025; 36:176-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/us9.0000000000000076
14. Al-Naggar K, Aljuma’ai N, Ahmed F, et al. Prevalence of urolithiasis in children from the EMRO region: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Emerg Med Trauma Acute Care 2025; 2025:40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5339/jemtac.2025.40
15. Akpayak IC, Ikeh CD. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of renal stone: an audit of outcomes and complications. Ann Afr Med. 2025; 24:461-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_5_25
16. Skolarikos A, Geraghty R, Somani B, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2025; 88:64-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.03.011
17. Ahmed EM. Management of nephrolithiasis in the Middle East over a recent decade: A systematic review. Urol Ann. 2024; 16:36-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_111_23
18. AlAzab R, Ghammaz O, Ardah N, et al. Predicting the stone- free status of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with the machine learning system. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2023; 16:197-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJNRD.S427404
19. Jazzar A, Medlej A, Rahhal N, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy safety, efficacy, and outcomes: a 10-year experience of a tertiary care center in South Lebanon. Cureus. 2025; 17:e84097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.84097
20. El-Nahas AR, Eraky I, Shokeir AA, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating staghorn stones: 10 years of experience of a tertiary-care centre. Arab J Urol. 2012; 10:324-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2012.03.002
21. Ali M, Naeem Q, Zafar U, et al. Outcomes and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a single-center experience. Cureus 2024; 16:e69567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.69567
22. Fuller A, Razvi H, Denstedt JD, et al. the croES percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: the influence of body mass index on outcome. J Urol. 2012;188:138-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.013
23. de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, et al. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol. 2011; 25:11-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0424
24. Sierra A, Alfambra H, López JM, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in kidney transplant recipients: results from a multicenter study by the Spanish Urology Association's Renal Transplant Group. World J Urol. 2025;43:564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05467-x
25. El-Nahas AR, Shokeir AA, El-Assmy AM, et al. Colonic perforation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: study of risk factors. Urology. 2006; 67:937-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.11.025
26. Öztürk H. Treatment of colonic injury during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Rev Urol. 2015; 17:194-201.
27. Seitz C, Desai M, Häcker A, et al. Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Eur Urol. 2012; 61:146-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.016
28. Atassi N, Knoll T. Future of kidney stone management: surgical intervention miniaturization of PCNL: where is the limit? Curr Opin Urol. 2020; 30:107-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000713
29. Talyshinskii A, Tzelves L, Juliebø-Jones P, et al. The evolution of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy - An overview from European Association of Urology Endourology Section. J Endourol. 2025;39:985-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0910
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.