Original Papers - Oncology

Hyperthermic vs normothermic mitomycin C for intermediate-risk NMIBC: a real-world retrospective cohort study

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 23 July 2025
Accepted: 28 July 2025
Published: 5 November 2025
557
Views
259
Downloads

Authors

Introduction: Hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVeC) with mitomycin C (MMC) is an emerging strategy in the management of intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (Ir-NMIBC). By combining chemotherapy with controlled hyperthermia (43°C), this approach aims to enhance drug absorption, increase cytotoxicity, and stimulate immune activation, potentially improving efficacy compared to standard MMC. The aim of this study was to compare oncologic efficacy, adverse effects, and safety between HIVeC and standard normothermic MMC in patients with Ir-NMIBC.
Patients and methods: we conducted a retrospective cohort study including 76 patients with Ir-NMIBC treated between January 2020 and december 2023. Patients received HIVeC (n=36) or standard MMC (n=40) following complete transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TUrBT). The instillation schedule consisted of four weekly induction instillations followed by three monthly maintenance instillations. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (rFs); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFs), adverse events (Aes), and treatment compliance.
Results: A total of 76 patients were included: 36 received HIVeC and 40 received standard MMC. Baseline characteristics were balanced across groups, with a median age of 68 years and 86.8% male. Most tumors were unifocal (85.5%), stage pTa (88.2%), and low-grade (61.8%). At a median follow-up of 36 months (IQr 24-36), recurrence occurred in 38.9% of HIVeC patients vs 30.0% in the MMC group. Median time to recurrence was longer with HIVeC (15.0 vs 10.5 months). The 24-months recurrence-free survival was 62.2% for HIVeC and 69.4% for MMC (p=0.365). Progression to muscle-invasive disease occurred in one MMC patient (2.5%); none progressed in the HIVeC arm (PFs at 24 months: 100% vs 97.5%, p=0.343). Compliance was high in both arms (HIVeC 88.9%, MMC 87.5%). Adverse events were mild (grade 1-2) and evenly distributed; no grade ≥3 events were observed. Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity occurred in 13% of HIVeC and 7% of MMC patients (p=0.47).
Conclusions: HIVeC with MMC demonstrated comparable oncologic outcomes to normothermic MMC in Ir-NMIBC, with a longer time to recurrence and similar tolerability. These findings suggest its potential use in selected patients, but should be interpreted with caution due to the retrospective design and limited sample size. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024; 74:229-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834
2. Gontero P, Birtle A, Capoun O, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (TaT1 and carcinoma in situ) - A summary of the 2024 guidelines update. Eur Urol. 2024; 86:531-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2024.07.027
3. Burger M, Catto JWF, Dalbagni G, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2013; 63:234-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.033
4. Sylvester RJ, Van Der Meijden APM, Oosterlinck W, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC Risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006; 49:466-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.031
5. Tan WS, Steinberg G, Witjes JA, et al. Intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer: updated consensus definition and management recommendations from the international bladder cancer group. Eur Urol Oncol. 2022; 5:505-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2022.05.005
6. Sylvester RJ, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA. The schedule and duration of intravesical chemotherapy in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review of the published results ofrandomized clinical trials. Eur Urol. 2008; 53:709-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.015
7. Kamat AM, Hahn NM, Efstathiou JA, et al. Bladder cancer. Lancet 2016;388:2796-810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30512-8
8. Fankhauser CD, Teoh JYC, Mostafid H. Treatment options and results of adjuvant treatment in nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) during the bacillus Calmette-Guérin shortage. Curr Opin Urol. 2020; 30:365-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000739
9. Tan WS, Kelly JD. Intravesical device-assisted therapies for nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2018; 15:667-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-018-0092-z
10. Grimberg DC, Shah A, Tan WP, et al. Hyperthermia improves solubility of intravesical chemotherapeutic agents. Bladder Cancer. 2020; 6:461-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/BLC-200350
11. Angulo JC, Álvarez-Ossorio JL, Domínguez-Escrig JL, et al. Hyperthermic mitomycin C in intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasivebladder cancer: results of the HIVEC-1 trial. Eur Urol Oncol. 2023; 6:58-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2022.10.008
12. Tan WS, Prendergast A, Ackerman C, et al. Adjuvant intravesical chemohyperthermia versus passive chemotherapy in patients with intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HIVEC-II): A phase 2, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2023; 83:497-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.08.003
13. Lammers RJM, Witjes JA, Inman BA, et al. The role of a combined regimen with intravesical chemotherapy and hyperthermia in the management of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2011; 60:81-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.04.023
14. Ghodoussipour S, Bivalacqua T, Bryan RT, et al. A systematic review of novel intravesical approaches for the treatment of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2025; 88:33-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.02.010
15. Plata A, Guerrero-Ramos F, Garcia C, et al. Long-term experience with hyperthermic chemotherapy (HIVEC) using mitomycin-C in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer in Spain. J Clin Med. 2021; 10:5105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215105
16. Guerrero-Ramos F, González-Padilla DA, González-Díaz A, et al. Recirculating hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy with mitomycin C (HIVEC) versus BCG in high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: results of the HIVEC-HR randomized clinical trial. World J Urol. 2022; 40:999-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03928-1
17. Thyavihally YB, Waigankar SS, Dev P, et al. Comparing advers effects, short term outcomes, and cost implications of hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy with mitomycin-C and intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin instillation (Moscow-I strain) in the management of intermediate and high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.
Urol Ann. 2021; 13:424-30.
18. Arends TJH, Nativ O, Maffezzini M, De Cobelli O, et al. Results of a randomised controlled trial comparing intravesical chemohyperthermia with mitomycin C versus bacillus Calmette-Guérin for adjuvant treatment of patients with intermediate- and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder Cancer. Eur Urol. 2016; 69:1046-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.006
19. Smani S, DuBois J, Zhao K, et al. Advancements in the diagnosis, treatment, and risk stratification of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2025;27:236-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-025-01645-7

How to Cite



Hyperthermic vs normothermic mitomycin C for intermediate-risk NMIBC: a real-world retrospective cohort study. (2025). Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 97(4). https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2025.14167