https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2025.14075
Comments on "Barts flank-free modified supine position vs prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis"
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 28 August 2025
To the Editor,
We read the meta-analysis by Ananda et al. with great interest and congratulate the authors on their contribution...
Downloads
1. Ananda IGYP, Santosa KB, Yudiana IW, et al. Barts flank-free modified supine position vs prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Systematic review and meta analysis. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2024; 96:12944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.12944
2. Bach C, Goyal A, Kumar P, et al. The Barts 'flank-free' modified supine position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Int. 2012; 89:365-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000341430
3. Karaolides T, Moraitis K, Bach C, et al. Positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Thirty-five years of evolution. Arab J Urol. 2012;10:307-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2012.06.005
4. Ray AA, Chung DG, Honey RJ. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone and prone-flexed positions: anatomic considerations. J Endourol 2009; 23:1607-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0294
5. Papatsoris A, Masood J, El-Husseiny T, et al. Improving patient positioning to reduce complications in prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2009; 23:831-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0611
6. Hunt K, Bajekal R, Calder I, et al. Changes in intraocular pressure in anesthetized prone patients. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2004;16:287-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00008506-200410000-00005
7. Feindel W. Neurosurgery at the Montreal Neurological Institute and McGill University Hospitals. Neurosurgery 1996; 39:830-839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199610000-00038
8. Li J, Gao L, Li Q, et al. Supine versus prone position percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2019; 66:62-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.04.016
9. Farkouh A, Park K, Buell MI, et al. Prone vs supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does position affect renal pelvic pressures? Urolithiasis 2024; 52:66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01555-6
10. Kasap Y, Senel S, Uzun E, et al. Does surgical position affect infective complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Urolithiasis 2022;50:765-771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-022-01367-6
11. Moreland H, Smith L, Stowasser V, et al. The endourological society inaugural census report. J Endourol 2023; 37:199-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0516
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.