Reviews - Andrology

Evaluating hormonal differences in post-orchidopexy patients: a meta-analysis of palpable vs. nonpalpable undescended testis

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 17 April 2025
Published: 30 June 2025
774
Views
419
Downloads

Authors

Introduction: Cryptorchidism or undescended testis (UDT) is one of the most common congenital anomalies in male infants. Based on the physical examination, UDT can be classified into palpable and non-palpable. However, despite successful repositioning, the long-term function of the testis is still a concern. This meta-analysis aims to compare the testicular function of palpable UDT and non-palpable UDT post-orchidopexy using hormonal markers such as FSH, LH, and testosterone.
Materials and methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases up to March 2025. Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager (RevMan).
Results: Four eligible studies were included in the analysis, involving 207 patients who underwent orchidopexy for UDT, including 160 with palpable UDT and 47 with non-palpable UDT. There is no significant difference between palpable compared to non-palpable in terms of FSH (MD 0.78 IU/L [95% CI: -0.34 to 1.90], p = 0.14); LH (MD -0.17 IU/L [95% CI: -0.45 to 0.12], p = 0.25); and testosterone (-0.08 IU/L [95% CI: -0.64 to 0.48], p = 0.78).
Conclusions: Testicular functions, including FSH, LH, and testosterone, in palpable UDT did not differ significantly from those in non-palpable UDT.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Liu J, Xiu W, Sui B, et al. Open controversies on the treatment of undescended testis: An update. Front Pediatr. 2022; 10:874995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.874995

Rodprasert W, Virtanen HE, Toppari J. Cryptorchidism and puberty. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1347435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1347435

Chiba K, Ishikawa T, Yamaguchi K, Fujisawa M. The efficacy of adult orchidopexy as a treatment of male infertility: our experience of 20 cases. Fertil Steril. 2009; 92:1337-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.104

Lee PA, Coughlin MT, Bellinger MF. Paternity and hormone levels after unilateral cryptorchidism: association with pretreatment testicular location. J Urol. 2000;164:1697-701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67087-5

Walczak-Jedrzejowska R, Niedzielski J, Slowikowska-Hilczer J, et al. Hormonal function of undescended testes before orchidopexy in prepubertal boys. J Clin Med. 2024; 14:73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010073

Sangster P, Alnajjar HM, Ahmed K, et al. Microdissection TESE (mTESE) following adult orchidopexy for undescended intra-abdominal and inguinal testicles – surgical techniques and outcomes from a single-centre cohort. Andrology. 2020;8:166-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12679

Trsinar B, Muravec UR. Fertility potential after unilateral and bilateral orchidopexy for cryptorchidism. World J Urol. 2009;27:513-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-009-0406-0

American Urological Association. Evaluation and treatment of cryptorchidism (2018). Accessed: 2025 Mar 25. Available from: https://www.auanet.org/guidelines-and-quality/guidelines/cryptorchidism-guideline

Uroweb [Internet]. EAU Guidelines on paediatric urology - Accessed: 2025 Mar 25. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/paediatric-urology/chapter/citation-information

How to Cite



Evaluating hormonal differences in post-orchidopexy patients: a meta-analysis of palpable vs. nonpalpable undescended testis. (2025). Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 97(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2025.13903