https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2025.13880
Predicting outcomes with pembrolizumab: a meta-analysis of pre-treatment hematological and clinical prognostic factors in advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 16 June 2025
Introduction: Recent studies have shown the therapeutic benefits of pembrolizumab in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). However, its high cost and variable patient responses remain challenges. This study aims to investigate the prognostic value of pre-treatment hematologic and clinical parameters in predicting outcomes in mUC patients.
Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across five databases for relevant articles. Studies that assessed the relationship between pre-treatment hematological and clinical parameters and either progression free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) were included and evaluated for bias.
Results: The literature search identified 27 studies encompassing a total of 4,731 patients. Several prognostic factors linked to OS were identified, with the most adverse survival outcomes associated with hypoalbuminemia (HR 3.13, 95% CI: 2.52-3.88), ECOG-PS ≥2 (HR 2.94, 95% CI: 2.65-3.26), and the presence of liver metastasis (HR 2.44, 95% CI: 2.16-2.76). Additionally, the presence of bone, liver, or lung metastases, ECOG-PS ≥ 2, surgical excision of the primary tumor, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and low hemoglobin levels were all correlated with unfavorable PFS and OS.
Conclusions: Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma and poor performance status, visceral metastases, high NLR or CRP, or low hemoglobin may have poorer survival, even with pembrolizumab. These factors may help guide clinical decisions for patients with advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
Downloads
Lenis AT, Lec PM, Chamie K, Mshs MD. Bladder cancer: a review. JAMA. 2020; 324:1980-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.17598
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71:209-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
Heijden AG van der, Bruins HM, Carrion A, et al. EAU Guideline son muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. In Arnhem, The Netherlands: EAU Guidelines Office; 2025. Available from:https://uroweb.org/guidelines/muscle-invasive-and-metastatic-bladder-cancer/
Dash A, Galsky MD, Vickers AJ, et al. Impact of renal impairment on eligibility for adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Cancer. 2006; 107:506-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22031
Balar AV, Galsky MD, Rosenberg JE, et al. Atezolizumab as first line treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet 2017; 389:67-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32455-2
Balar AV, Castellano D, O’Donnell PH, et al. First-line pembrolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic urothelial cancer (KEYNOTE-052): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18:1483-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30616-2
Merck Sharp, Dohme LLC. A study of efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus enfortumab vedotin (EV) +/- investigational agents in first-line metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) (MK-3475-04B/KEYMAKER-U04). 2025 Report No. NCT05845814. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05845814.
Powles T, Valderrama BP, Gupta S, et al. Enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab in untreated advanced urothelial cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024; 390:875-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2312117
Rosenberg JE, O’Donnell PH, Balar AV, et al. Pivotal trial of enfortumab vedotin in urothelial carcinoma after platinum and anti-programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37:2592-600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01140
Khunger M, Hernandez AV, Pasupuleti V, et al. Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) ligand (PD-L1) expression in solid tumors as a predictive biomarker of benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 axis inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.16.00030
:1-15.
Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, et al. PD-1 Blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372:2509-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1500596
Hayden JA, Côté P, Bombardier C. Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:427-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-144-6-200603210-00010
McGuinness LA, Higgins JPT. Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-biasassessments. Res Synth Methods. 2021; 12:55-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1411
Higgins JPT. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327:557-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
Tanabe K, Kobayashi S, Maezawa Y, et al. Gustave Roussy immune score as a prognostic biomarker in patients with platinumrefractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab: YUSHIMA study. Int J Clin Oncol. 2024; 29:1302-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02563-7
Tomioka-Inagawa R, Nakane K, Enomoto T, et al. The impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after two courses of pembrolizumab for oncological outcomes in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Biomedicines. 2022; 10:1609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071609
Kobayashi T, Ito K, Kojima T, et al. Pre-pembrolizumab neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) predicts the efficacy of second-line pembrolizumab treatment in urothelial cancer regardless of the prechemo NLR. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022; 71:461-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-021-03000-8
Kurashina R, Ando K, Inoue M, et al. Pretreatment hemoglobin levels and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predict survival benefit from pembrolizumab in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Diagn Progn. 2023; 3:230-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/cdp.10206
Plimack ER, Bellmunt J, Gupta S, et al. Safety and activity of pembrolizumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (KEYNOTE-012): a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1b study. Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18:212-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30007-4
Bellmunt J, De Wit R, Vaughn DJ, et al. Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376:1015-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1613683
Huang J, Teng X. Expression of PD-L1 for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Oncol. 2020; 27:656-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6437
Powles T, Csoszi T, .zgüroglu M, et al. Pembrolizumab alone or combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (KEYNOTE-361): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021; 22:931-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00152-2
Shinagare AB, Ramaiya NH, Jagannathan JP, et al. Metastatic pattern of bladder cancer: correlation with the characteristics of the primary tumor. Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196:117-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5036
Hsieh M-C, Chiang P-H, Rau K-M, et al. Metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder with lymph node-only metastasis treated with M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin) has a better survival than GC (gemcitabine and cisplatin). J Cancer Res Pract 2014;1;197-207.
Shou J, Zhang Q, Zhang D. The prognostic effect of metastasis patterns on overall survival in patients with distant metastatic bladder cancer: a SEER population-based analysis. World J Urol. 2021;39:4151-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03721-6
Tatokoro M, Kihara K. Liver metastases from ureteral and bladder cancer. In: Di Carlo I, editor. Non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases. Cham, Springer; 2015. p. 175-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09293-5_14
Wallmeroth A, Wagner U, Moch H, et al. Patterns of metastasis in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (pT2-4): An autopsy study on 367 patients. Urol Int. 1999; 62:69-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000030361
Makrakis D, Talukder R, Lin GI, et al. Association between sites of metastasis and outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022;20:e440-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2022.06.001
Vuky J, Balar AV, Castellano D, et al. Long-term outcomes in KEYNOTE-052: phase II study investigating first-line pembrolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020; 38:2658-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01213
Gou M, Zhang Y, Liu T, et al. The prognostic value of pre-treatment hemoglobin (Hb) in patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer treated with immunotherapy. Front Oncol. 2021; 11:655716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.655716
Zhang Z, Zhang F, Yuan F, et al. Pretreatment hemoglobin level as a predictor to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint
inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020; 12:1758835920970049.
He Y, Ren T, Ji C, et al. The baseline hemoglobin level is a positive biomarker for immunotherapy response and can improve the predictability of tumor mutation burden for immunotherapy response in cancer. Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1456833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1456833
Zhuang Y, Liu K, He Q, et al. Hypoxia signaling in cancer: Implications for therapeutic interventions. MedComm. 2023; 4:e203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.203
Templeton AJ, McNamara MG, Šeruga B, et al. Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014; 106:dju124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju124
Zidar DA, Al-Kindi SG, Liu Y, et al. Association of lymphopenia with risk of mortality among adults in the US general population. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2:e1916526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16526
Aggarwal BB, Vijayalekshmi RV, Sung B. Targeting inflammatory pathways for prevention and therapy of cancer: short-term friend, long-term foe. Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15:425-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0149
Ohsugi Y. Recent advances in immunopathophysiology of interleukin-6: An innovative therapeutic drug, tocilizumab (recombinant humanized anti-human interleukin-6 receptor antibody), unveils the mysterious etiology of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Biol Pharm Bull. 2007; 30:2001-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.30.2001
Li W, Luo X, Liu Z, et al. Prognostic value of C-reactive protein levels in patients with bone neoplasms: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018; 13:e0195769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195769
Gao GD, Sun B, Wang XB, Wang SM. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as prognostic indicator for patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer. Int J Biol Markers. 2017; 32:409-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5301/ijbm.5000294
Akashi Y, Yamamoto Y, Hashimoto M, et al. Prognostic factors of platinum-refractory advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab. Cancers. 2023; 15:5780. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15245780
Fukata S, Mizutani K, Yamamoto S, et al. Sarcopenia and the rate of change of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as predictors of pembrolizumab efficacy in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Anticancer Drugs. 2022; 33:459-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0000000000001279
Furubayashi N, Minato A, Negishi T, et al. The eosinophil changes, efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in advanced urothelial carcinoma patients with an older age and a poor performance status. OncoTargets Ther. 2022; 15:1321-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S389138
Ito K, Kobayashi T, Kojima T, et al. Pembrolizumab for treating advanced urothelial carcinoma in patients with impaired performance status: Analysis of a Japanese nationwide cohort. Cancer Med. 2021; 10:3188-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3863
Kawashima A, Yamamoto Y, Sato M, et al. FAN score comprising fibrosis-4 index, albumin-bilirubin score and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is a prognostic marker of urothelial carcinoma patients treated with pembrolizumab. Sci Rep. 2021; 11:21199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00509-x
Kita Y, Ito K, Kanda S, et al. Tolerability and treatment outcome of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma and severe renal dysfunction. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig. 2022; 40:410.e11-410.e18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.04.005
Kobayashi T, Ito K, Kojima T, et al. Risk stratification for the prognosis of patients with chemoresistant urothelial cancer treated with pembrolizumab. Cancer Sci. 2021; 112:760-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.14762
Komura K, Tokushige S, Ishida M, et al. Tertiary lymphoid structure and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio coordinately predict outcome of pembrolizumab. Cancer Sci. 2023; 114:4622-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.15976
Miyama Y, Kaneko G, Nishimoto K, Yasuda M. Lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and positive programmed cell death ligand-1 expression are favorable prognostic markers in patients treated with pembrolizumab for urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Med. 2022;11:4236-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4779
Nagasaka H, Yamamoto S, Suzuki A, et al. C-reactive protein is a prognostic factor for survival in metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients receiving pembrolizumab. In Vivo. 2024; 38:1823-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13634
Nishio K, Higashio T, Komura K, et al. Predicting objective response of pembrolizumab in platinum-refractory urothelial carcinoma based on neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio fluctuation and liver metastases. Oncology. 2024; 102:457-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000534554
Ogihara K, Kikuchi E, Shigeta K, et al. The pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a novel biomarker for predicting clinical responses to pembrolizumab in platinum-resistant metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients. Urol Oncol. 2020; 38:602.e1-602.e10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.02.005
Rijnders M, Robbrecht DGJ, Oostvogels AAM, et al. A blood based immune marker for resistance to pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2023; 72:759-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-022-03250-0
Sato R, Inamoto T, Matsushita Y, et al. Significance of second progression-free survival in patients with advanced urothelial cancer who received platinum-based combination chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab. Int J Urol. 2023; 30:730-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.15133
Shimizu T, Miyake M, Hori S, et al. Clinical impact of sarcopenia and inflammatory/nutritional markers in patients with unresectable metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab. Diagnostics. 2020; 10:310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10050310
Tamura D, Jinnouchi N, Abe M, et al. Prognostic outcomes and safety in patients treated with pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma: experience in real-world clinical practice. Int J Clin Oncol. 2020; 25:899-905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01613-9
Uchimoto T, Komura K, Fukuokaya W, et al. Risk classification for overall survival by the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and the number of metastatic sites in patients treated with pembrolizumab— a multicenter collaborative study in Japan. Cancers. 2021; 13:3554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13143554
Uchimoto T, Nakamura K, Komura K, et al. Prognostic value of the fluctuation in the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio at 6 weeks of pembrolizumab treatment is specific to the clinical response in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig. 2022;40:344.e11-344.e17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.02.012
Umeda K, Tanaka N, Yasumizu Y, et al. Site-specific differences in PD-1 blockade success and biomarkers in urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2023;21:128-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2022.08.004
Yamamoto S, Fukushima H, Fukuda S, et al. Early cancer cachexia phenotype predicts survival of advanced urothelial cancer patients treated with pembrolizumab. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2022;18:410-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13666
Yamashita S, Wada T, Deguchi R, et al. Prognostic significance of pre-treatment albumin-bilirubin grade in metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving pembrolizumab. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2023; 53:845-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyad069
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.