Risk of urogenital infections in non-diabetic patients treated with sodium glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. Systematic review and meta-analysis


Published: June 13, 2023
Abstract Views: 1498
PDF: 1056
Supplementary material: 64
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Rawa Bapir U-merge Ltd. (Urology for emerging countries), London-Athens-Dubai; Smart Health Tower, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan region, Iraq.
  • Kamran Hassan Bhatti U-merge Ltd. (Urology for emerging countries), London-Athens-Dubai; Urology Department, HMC, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar.
  • Ahmed Eliwa U-merge Ltd. (Urology for emerging countries), London-Athens-Dubai; Department of Urology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Sharkia, Egypt.
  • Herney Andrés García-Perdomo U-merge Ltd. (Urology for emerging countries), London-Athens-Dubai; Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
  • Nazim Gherabi U-merge Ltd. (Urology for emerging countries), London-Athens-Dubai; Faculty of Medicine Algiers 1, Algiers, Algeria.
  • Derek Hennessey U-merge Ltd. (Urology for emerging countries), London-Athens-Dubai; Department of Urology, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
  • Vittorio Magri U-merge Ltd. (Urology for emerging countries), London-Athens-Dubai; Urology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy.
  • Panagiotis Mourmouris U-merge Ltd. (Urology for emerging countries), London-Athens-Dubai; 2nd Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanoglio Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Adama Ouattara U-merge Ltd. (Urology for emerging countries), London-Athens-Dubai; Division of Urology, Souro Sanou University Teaching Hospital, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
  • Gianpaolo Perletti U-merge Ltd. (Urology for emerging countries), London-Athens-Dubai; Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, Section of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
  • Joseph Philipraj U-merge Ltd. (Urology for emerging countries), London-Athens-Dubai; Department of Urology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Puducherry, India.
  • Konstantinos Stamatiou U-merge Ltd. (Urology for emerging countries), London-Athens-Dubai; Department of Urology, Tzaneio General Hospital, 18536 Piraeus, Greece.
  • Musliu Adetola Tolani U-merge Ltd. (Urology for emerging countries), London-Athens-Dubai; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Ahmadu Bello University/Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria.
  • Lazaros Tzelves U-merge Ltd. (Urology for emerging countries), London-Athens-Dubai; 2nd Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanoglio Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Stefan D. Anker Department of Cardiology and BCRT (Campus CVK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
  • Alberto Trinchieri U-merge Ltd. (Urology for emerging countries), London-Athens-Dubai; Urology School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9394-8292
  • Noor Buchholz U-merge Ltd. (Urology for emerging countries), London-Athens-Dubai; Sobeh's Vascular and Medical Center, Dubai Health Care City, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Although SGLT2 inhibitors have been initially employed in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, their clinical use was later extended to the treatment of other conditions such as heart failure, chronic kidney disease and obesity. In patients with type 2 diabetes, the administration of SGLT2 inhibitors has been associated with an increased incidence of urogenital infections, which may be linked to high glucose levels in the urine. The rate of urogenital side effects may be different in non-diabetic patients. The aim of this study was to review the risk of urogenital infections in non-diabetic patients taking SGLT2 inhibitors. Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching PubMed and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting urogenital adverse effects in non-diabetic patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors. Odds ratios for urogenital infections were calculated using random effect Mantel-Haenszel statistics. Results: Out of 387 citations retrieved, 12 eligible RCTs were assessed for risk of bias and included in the meta-analysis. Compared to placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with increased odds of genital infections (OR 3.01, 95% CI: 1.93- 4.68, 9 series, 7326 participants, Z = 5.74, p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%) as well as urinary tract infections (OR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.13-1.57, 9 series, 7326 participants, Z = 4.05, p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%). When four trials investigating the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in populations including both diabetic and non-diabetic patients were considered, administration of SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetic patients was associated with significantly higher odds of genital infections but not urinary tract infections compared to patients without type 2 diabetes. In patients taking placebo, the odds for urinary tract infections were significantly increased in diabetic patients compared to non-diabetic patients. Conclusions: The risk of genital infections is increased also in non-diabetic patients taking SGLT2 inhibitors although at a lesser extent that in diabetics. A careful assessment of the local anatomical conditions and of the history of previous urogenital infections is desirable to select those patients who need more intense follow-up, possibly combined with prophylactic measures of infections during treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors.


Monami M, Nardini C, Mannucci E. Efficacy and safety of sodium glucose co-transport-2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014; 16:457-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12244

Butler J, Usman MS, Khan MS, et al. Efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis. ESC Heart Fail. 2020; 7:3298-3309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13169

Hallow KM, Helmlinger G, Greasley PJ, et al. Why do SGLT2 inhibitors reduce heart failure hospitalization? A differential volume regulation hypothesis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018; 20:479-487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13126

Heerspink HJL, Stefánsson BV, Correa-Rotter R, et al. DAPACKD Trial Committees and Investigators. Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383:1436-1446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2024816

Zheng H, Liu M, Li S, et al. Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors in Non-Diabetic Adults With Overweight or Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021; 12:706914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.706914

Puckrin R, Saltiel MP, Reynier P, et al. SGLT-2 inhibitors and the risk of infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Diabetol. 2018; 55:503-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-018-1116-0

Li D, Wang T, Shen S, et al. Urinary tract and genital infections in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017; 19:348-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12825

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6:e1000097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019; 366:l4898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898

Bays HE, Weinstein R, Law G, Canovatchel W. Canagliflozin: effects in overweight and obese subjects without diabetes mellitus. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014; 22:1042-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20663

Hollander P, Bays HE, Rosenstock J, et al. Coadministration of Canagliflozin and Phentermine for Weight Management in Overweight and Obese Individuals Without Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care. 2017; 40:632-639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-2427

Lundkvist P, Pereira MJ, Katsogiannos , et al. Dapagliflozin once daily plus exenatide once weekly in obese adults without diabetes: Sustained reductions in body weight, glycaemia and blood pressure over 1 year. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017; 19:1276-1288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12954

Cherney DZI, Dekkers CCJ, Barbour SJ, et al. DIAMOND investigators. Effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin on proteinuria in non-diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease (DIAMOND): a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020; 8:582-593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30162-5

Reis J, Teixeira AR, Gonçalves AV, et al. Dapagliflozin Impact on the Exercise Capacity of Non-Diabetic Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Patients. J Clin Med. 2022; 11:2935. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102935

Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, et al. EMPEROR-Preserved Trial Investigators. Empagliflozin in Heart Failure with a Preserved Ejection Fraction. N Engl J Med. 2021; 385:1451-1461 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2107038

Abraham WT, Lindenfeld J, Ponikowski P, et al. Effect of empagliflozin on exercise ability and symptoms in heart failure patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction, with and without type 2 diabetes. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42:700-710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa943

The EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group; Herrington WG, Staplin N, Wanner C, et al. Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. N Engl J Med. 2023; 388:117-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2204233

McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, et al. DAPA-HF Trial Committees and Investigators. Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381:1995-2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1911303

Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, et al. EMPEROR-Reduced Trial Investigators. Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383:1413-1424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2022190

Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, Claggett B, et al. DELIVER Trial Committees and Investigators. Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction. N Engl J Med. 2022; 387:1089-1098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2206286

Wheeler DC, Stefánsson BV, Jongs N, et al. DAPA-CKD Trial Committees and Investigators. Effects of dapagliflozin on major adverse kidney and cardiovascular events in patients with diabetic and non-diabetic chronic kidney disease: a prespecified analysis from the DAPA-CKD trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021; 9:22-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30369-7

Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, et al. Effect of Empagliflozin on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure by Baseline Diabetes Status: Results From the EMPEROR-Reduced Trial. Circulation. 2021; 143:337-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.051824

https://www.g-ba.de/bewertungsverfahren/nutzenbewertung/810/. Nutzenbewertungsverfahren zum Wirkstoff Empagliflozin (Neues Anwendungsgebiet: chronische Herzinsuffizienz mit linksventrikulärer Ejektionsfraktion LVEF > 40 %) - Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (g-ba.de)

Fünfstück R, Nicolle LE, Hanefeld M, Naber KG. Urinary tract infection in patients with diabetes mellitus. Clin Nephrol. 2012; 77:40-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5414/CN107216

Nicolle LE, Capuano G, Fung A, Usiskin K. Urinary tract infection in randomized phase III studies of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor. Postgrad Med. 2014; 126:7-17.

Geerlings SE, Brouwer EC, Gaastra W, et al. Effect of glucose and pH on uropathogenic and non-uropathogenic Escherichia coli: studies with urine from diabetic and non-diabetic individuals. J Med Microbiol. 1999; 48:535-539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/00222615-48-6-535

Turan H, Serefhanoglu K, Torun AN, et al. Frequency, risk factors, and responsible pathogenic microorganisms of asymptomatic bacteriuria in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2008; 61:236-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7883/yoken.JJID.2008.236

Geerlings SE, Stolk RP, Camps MJ, et al. Asymptomatic bacteriuria may be considered a complication in women with diabetes. Diabetes Mellitus Women Asymptomatic Bacteriuria Utrecht Study Group. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23:744-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.23.6.744

Geerlings SE, Stolk RP, Camps MJ, et al. Diabetes Women Asymptomatic Bacteriuria Utrecht Study Group. Risk factors for symptomatic urinary tract infection in women with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23:1737-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.23.12.1737

Nicolle LE, Capuano G, Fung A, Usiskin K. Urinary tract infection in randomized phase III studies of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor. Postgrad Med. 2014; 126:7-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3810/pgm.2014.01.2720

Gunther LS, Martins HP, Gimenes F, et al. Prevalence of Candida albicans and non-albicans isolates from vaginal secretions: comparative evaluation of colonization, vaginal candidiasis and recurrent vaginal candidiasis in diabetic and non-diabetic women. Sao Paulo Med J. 2014; 132:116-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2014.1322640

Ciurea CN, Kosovski IB, Mare AD, et al. Candida and Candidiasis-Opportunism Versus Pathogenicity: A Review of the Virulence Traits. Microorganisms. 2020; 8:857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8060857

Mukaremera L, Lee KK, Mora-Montes HM, Gow NAR. Candida albicans Yeast, Pseudohyphal, and Hyphal Morphogenesis Differentially Affects Immune Recognition. Front Immunol. 2017; 8:629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00629

Nikou SA, Kichik N, Brown R, et al. Candida albicans Interactions with Mucosal Surfaces during Health and Disease. Pathogens. 2019; 8:53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens8020053

Rodrigues CF, Rodrigues ME, Henriques M. Candida sp. Infections in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Med. 2019; 8:76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8010076

Van Ende M, Wijnants S, Van Dijck P. Sugar Sensing and Signaling in Candida albicans and Candida glabrata. Front Microbiol. 2019; 10:99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00099

Chandra J, Kuhn D, Mukherjee P, et al. Biofilm formation by the fungal pathogen Candida albicans: Development, architecture, and drug resistance. J. Bacteriol. 2001; 183:5385-5394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.18.5385-5394.2001

Talapko J, Meštrovic T, Škrlec I. Growing importance of urogenital candidiasis in individuals with diabetes: A narrative review. World J Diabetes. 2022; 13:809-821. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v13.i10.809

Mikamo H, Yamagishi Y, Sugiyama H, et al. High glucose-mediated overexpression of ICAM-1 in human vaginal epithelial cells increases adhesion of Candida albicans. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018; 38:226-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2017.1343810

Calvet HM, Yoshikawa TT. Infections in diabetes. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2001; 15:407-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5520(05)70153-7

Alexander JT, Staab EM, Wan W, et al. Longer-term Benefits and Risks of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2022; 37:439-448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07227-0

Yokoyama H, Nagao A, Watanabe S, Honjo J. Incidence and risk of vaginal candidiasis associated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in real-world practice for women with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Investig. 2019; 10:439-445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12912

Sha S, Devineni D, Ghosh A, et al. Canagliflozin, a novel inhibitor of sodium glucose co-transporter 2, dose dependently reduces calculated renal threshold for glucose excretion and increases

urinary glucose excretion in healthy subjects. Diabetes Obes Metab 2011; 13:669-672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01406.x

Sarich T, Devineni D, Ghosh A, et al. Canagliflozin, a novel inhibitor of sodium glucose co-transporter 2, increases 24-hour urinary glucose excretion and reduces body weight in obese subjects over 2 weeks of treatment. Diabetologia. 2010; 53(Suppl. 1):S349-S350.

Novak LM, Kruger DF. Bolstering your armamentarium with SGLT2 inhibitors. Nurse Pract. 2017; 42:28-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NPR.0000524665.16846.63

Rieg T, Masuda T, Gerasimova M, et al. Increase in SGLT1- mediated transport explains renal glucose reabsorption during genetic and pharmacological SGLT2 inhibition in euglycemia. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2014; 306:F188-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00518.2013

Nagata T, Fukazawa M, Honda K, et al. Selective SGLT2 inhibition by tofogliflozin reduces renal glucose reabsorption under hyperglycemic but not under hypo- or euglycemic conditions in rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 304:E414-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00545.2012

Staplin N, Roddick AJ, Emberson J, et al. Net effects of sodiumglucose co-transporter-2 inhibition in different patient groups: a meta-analysis of large placebo-controlled randomized trials. EClinicalMedicine. 2021; 41:101163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101163

McGovern AP, Hogg M, Shields BM, et al. MASTERMIND consortium. Risk factors for genital infections in people initiating SGLT2 inhibitors and their impact on discontinuation. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020; 8:e001238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001238

Cooke G, Watson C, Deckx L, et al. Treatment for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush) Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 1:CD009151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009151.pub2

Bapir, R., Bhatti, K. H., Eliwa, A., García-Perdomo, H. A., Gherabi, N., Hennessey, D., Magri, V., Mourmouris, P., Ouattara, A., Perletti, G., Philipraj, J., Stamatiou, K., Tolani, M. A., Tzelves, L., Anker, S. D., Trinchieri, A., & Buchholz, N. (2023). Risk of urogenital infections in non-diabetic patients treated with sodium glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 95(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2023.11509

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations