Telemedicine and social media: A contemporary analysis of the most shared content by internet users
https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.11206
Accepted: February 17, 2023
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Objective: To evaluate the telemedicine information published on the most popular social media platforms, during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: We queried the BuzzSumo tool to identify related telemedicine article links that were shared most on social media, from February 2021 to February 2022. The PEMAT-P was used for the quality assessment of the most shared links.
Results: 125 links were eligible for the analysis. Facebook was the most used social media platform for sharing articles (median engagement: 1000). Most of the articles were published by magazines (n = 82, 65.6%) and the main topic addressed was general information (n = 49, 39.2%). In the subgroup analyses of the 34 most shared articles, Facebook was the most used social media platform (median engagement:1950), most of the articles were published by magazines (n = 24, 70.6%), whereas the main topic addressed was the prescription of the abortion pill (n = 9, 26.5%). According to the PEMAT-P tool, the median understandability and actionability score was 63.8 and 20%, respectively.
Conclusions: The interest in telemedicine has increased all over the world, as evidenced by the high engagement in social media articles, recorded during the last year. However, the access to digital health services is still limited, the information provided is often not verified by an official entity and unable to fill the digital divide exacerbated by COVID 19 pandemic crisis. Hence, health policy should be developed or modified to ensure a more egalitarian Internet access for all citizens. Official medical institutions should standardize telemedicine regulation and online content to reduce the widespread of misleading information.
Dorsey ER, Topol EJ. State of Telehealth. Campion EW, editor. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 14;375(2):154–61.
Gajarawala SN, Pelkowski JN. Telehealth Benefits and Barriers. J Nurse Pract. 2021 Feb;17(2):218–21.
Kichloo A, Albosta M, Dettloff K, Wani F, El-Amir Z, Singh J, et al. Telemedicine, the current COVID-19 pandemic and the future: a narrative review and perspectives moving forward in the USA. Fam Med Community Health. 2020 Aug;8(3):e000530.
Mirone V, Creta M, Capece M, Celentano G, Califano G, Collà Ruvolo C, et al. Telementoring for communication between residents and faculty physicians: Results from a survey on attitudes and perceptions in an Academic Tertiary Urology Referral Department in Italy. Arch Ital Urol E Androl. 2021 Dec 21;93(4):450–4.
Hollander JE, Carr BG. Virtually Perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1679–81.
Novara G, Checcucci E, Crestani A, Abrate A, Esperto F, Pavan N, et al. Telehealth in Urology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. How Much Can Telemedicine Be Useful During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic? Eur Urol. 2020 Dec;78(6):786–811.
Mirone V, Celentano G, Collà Ruvolo C, Cirillo L, Fusco GM, Abate M, et al. Perceptions and attitudes toward the use of telemedicine for the postoperative outpatient urological care during the COVID-19 pandemic in an Academic Hospital in Southern Italy. Arch Ital Urol Androl Organo Uff Soc Ital Ecogr Urol E Nefrol. 2022 Dec 27;94(4):375–9.
Monaghesh E, Hajizadeh A. The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence. BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec;20(1):1193.
Stipa G, Gabbrielli F, Rabbito C, Di Lazzaro V, Amantini A, Grippo A, et al. The Italian technical/administrative recommendations for telemedicine in clinical neurophysiology. Neurol Sci. 2021 May;42(5):1923–31.
Creta M, Sagnelli C, Celentano G, Napolitano L, La Rocca R, Capece M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection affects the lower urinary tract and male genital system: A systematic review. J Med Virol. 2021;93(5):3133–42.
Turco C, Collà Ruvolo C, Cilio S, Celentano G, Califano G, Creta M, et al. Looking for cystoscopy on YouTube: Are videos a reliable information tool for internet users? Arch Ital Urol E Androl. 2022 Mar 29;94(1):57–61.
Collà Ruvolo C, Califano G, Tuccillo A, Tolentino S, Cancelliere E, Di Bello F, et al. “YouTubeTM as a source of information on placenta accreta: A quality analysis”. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 May;272:82–7.
Loeb S, Reines K, Abu-Salha Y, French W, Butaney M, Macaluso JN, et al. Quality of Bladder Cancer Information on YouTube. Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):56–9.
Alexa - Top sites [Internet]. [cited 2022 Apr 18]. Available from: https://www.alexa.com/topsites
Google Trends [Internet]. Google Trends. [cited 2021 Dec 30]. Available from: https://trends.google.it/trends/?geo=IT
Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO Declares COVID-19 a Pandemic. Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parm. 2020;91(1):157–60.
Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Situation Reports [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jun 7]. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports
Sj S. Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V). :4.
Di Bello F, Collà Ruvolo C, Cilio S, La Rocca R, Capece M, Creta M, et al. Testicular cancer and YouTube: What do you expect from a social media platform? Int J Urol Off J Jpn Urol Assoc. 2022 Mar 22;
Gerundo G, Collà Ruvolo C, Puzone B, Califano G, La Rocca R, Parisi V, et al. Personal protective equipment in Covid-19: Evidence-based quality and analysis of YouTube videos after one year of pandemic. Am J Infect Control. 2021 Nov;S0196655321007586.
Morra S, Collà Ruvolo C, Napolitano L, La Rocca R, Celentano G, Califano G, et al. YouTube TM as a source of information on bladder pain syndrome: A contemporary analysis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2021 Sep 24;nau.24802.
Alberto Melchionna, Claudia Collà Ruvolo, Marco Capece, Roberto La Rocca, Giuseppe Celentano, Gianluigi Califano, et al. Testicular pain and youtubeTM: are uploaded videos a reliable source to get information? International Journal of Impotence Research. 2022;
Capece M, Di Giovanni A, Cirigliano L, Napolitano L, La Rocca R, Creta M, et al. YouTube as a source of information on penile prosthesis. Andrologia [Internet]. 2021 Sep 14 [cited 2021 Dec 30]; Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/and.14246
Cilio S, Collà Ruvolo C, Turco C, Creta M, Capece M, La Rocca R, et al. Analysis of quality information provided by ‘Dr. YouTubeTM’ on Phimosis. Int J Impot Res. 2022 Mar 24;
Shoemaker SJ, Wolf MS, Brach C. Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): A new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):395–403.
National Telemedicine Guidelines [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://www.moh.gov.sg/docs/librariesprovider5/resources-statistics/guidelines/moh-cir-06_2015_30jan15_telemedicine-guidelines-rev.pdf
Becker CD, Dandy K, Gaujean M, Fusaro M, Scurlock C. Legal Perspectives on Telemedicine Part 1: Legal and Regulatory Issues. Perm J. 2019 Jun 7;23:18–293.
National Telemedicine Guidelines [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://www.mohfw.gov.in/pdf/Telemedicine.pdf
Copyright (c) 2024 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Downloads
Citations
