Safety and tolerability of biodegradable balloon spacers in patients undergoing radiotherapy for organ-confined prostate cancer


Submitted: January 21, 2023
Accepted: April 22, 2023
Published: June 13, 2023
Abstract Views: 680
PDF: 376
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Introduction: Radiotherapy is a common treatment for prostate cancer, and can be administered in various ways, including 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and hypo-fractionated radiation therapy. During treatment the gastrointestinal tract may be exposed to radiation and the rectal wall may be exposed to high doses of ionizing radiation, which can lead to rectal bleeding, ulcers or fistulas, and an increased risk of rectum cancer. Various strategies to minimize these complications have been developed in the last decade; one of the most promising is to use a rectal balloon to fixate the prostate gland during treatment or to inject biodegradable spacers between the prostate and rectum to reduce the rectal dose of radiation. Aim of our paper is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of spacers implantation. Materials and methods: From January 2021 to June 2022 all patients with a diagnosis of prostate cancer with unfavorable/ intermediate risk - poor prognosis and programmed hypofractionated radiation therapy were enrolled. In all patients biodegradable balloons spacers were placed posteriorly to the prostate to increase the separation between prostate and rectum. The duration of the procedure, observation time, the appearance of early and late complications and their severity (according to Charlson comorbidity index) and tolerability of the device were recorded at the time of positioning and after 10 days. Results: 25 patients were enrolled in our study. Two patients (8%) underwent acute urine retention resolved with catheterization and one patient (4%) developed a mild perineal hematoma that did not require any treatment. As regards late complications 1 patient (4%) developed hyperpyrexia (> 38°C) the day after the procedure requiring continuation of antibiotic regimen. At T1 visit we recorded no medium-high grade complications. As for the tolerability of the device, it was optimal with no perineal discomfort or alterations of bowel function. Conclusions: Biodegradable balloon spacers appears to be safe and well tolerated and its positioning does not present any technical difficulties or risks of major complications.


Wang L, Lu B, He M, et al. Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality: Global Status and Temporal Trends in 89 Countries From 2000 to 2019. Front Public Health. 2022; 10:811044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.811044

EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam 2022. ISBN 978-94 92671-16-5.

Hummel S, Simpson EL, Hemingway P, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2010; 14:1- 108, iii-iv. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3310/hta14470

Nilsson S, Norlén BJ, Widmark A. A systematic overview of radiation therapy effects in prostate cancer. Acta Oncol. 2004; 43:316-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860410030661

Navaratnam A, Cumsky J, Abdul-Muhsin H, et al. Assessment of Polyethylene Glycol Hydrogel Spacer and Its Effect on Rectal Radiation Dose in Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Proton Beam Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019; 5:92-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2019.08.007

Mok G, Benz E, Vallee JP, et al. Optimization of radiation therapy techniques for prostate cancer with prostate-rectum spacers: a systematic review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014; 90:278-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.06.044

Miller LE, Efstathiou JA, Bhattacharyya SK, et al. Association of the Placement of a Perirectal Hydrogel Spacer With the Clinical Outcomes of Men Receiving Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3:e208221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8221

Pepe P, Tamburo M, Panella P, et al. Erectile dysfunction following hydrogel injection and hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Our experience in 56 cases. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022; 94:166-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2022.2.166

Fathy MM, Hassan BZ, El-Gebaly RH, Mokhtar MH. Dosimetric evaluation study of IMRT and VMAT techniques for prostate cancer based on different multileaf collimator designs. Radiat Environ Biophys 2023; 62:97-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-022-01011-2

Thompson AB, Hamstra DA. Rectal Spacer Usage with Proton Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020; 108:644-648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.05.034

Sanei M, Ghaffari H, Ardekani MA, et al. Effectiveness of rectal displacement devices during prostate external-beam radiation therapy: A review. J Cancer Res Ther. 2021; 17:303-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_841_19

Pradere B, Veeratterapillay R, Dimitropoulos K, et al. Nonantibiotic Strategies for the Prevention of Infectious Complications following Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Urol. 2021; 205:653-663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001399

Topazio, L., Narcisi, F., Tana, F., Ciotta, C., Iossa, V., Perna, P., Chiaramonti, F., & Romantini, F. (2023). Safety and tolerability of biodegradable balloon spacers in patients undergoing radiotherapy for organ-confined prostate cancer. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 95(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2023.11156

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations