Mobile health applications in kidney stone disease management: A reliable support for patients?


Submitted: December 11, 2022
Accepted: December 28, 2022
Published: February 22, 2023
Abstract Views: 846
PDF: 417
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Luigi Cirillo Unit of Urology, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences, and Odontostomatology University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy.
  • Celeste Manfredi Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9706-8516
  • Biagio Barone Unit of Urology, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences, and Odontostomatology University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy.
  • Vincenzo Morgera Unit of Urology, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences, and Odontostomatology University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy.
  • Gianluigi Cacace Unit of Urology, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences, and Odontostomatology University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy.
  • Francesco Mastrangelo Unit of Urology, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences, and Odontostomatology University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy.
  • Francesco Di Bello Unit of Urology, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences, and Odontostomatology University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8585-3701
  • Marco Abate Unit of Urology, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences, and Odontostomatology University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy.
  • Davide Arcaniolo Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
  • Lorenzo Spirito Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1175-8637
  • Felice Crocetto Unit of Urology, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences, and Odontostomatology University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4315-7660
  • Roberto La Rocca Unit of Urology, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences, and Odontostomatology University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy.
  • Massimiliano Creta Unit of Urology, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences, and Odontostomatology University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy.
  • Francesco Paolo Calace Unit of Urology, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences, and Odontostomatology University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy.
  • Giovanni Maria Fusco Unit of Urology, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences, and Odontostomatology University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy.
  • Luigi Napolitano Unit of Urology, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences, and Odontostomatology University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2036-0356

Introduction: Mobile health applications (MHAs) represent an interesting issue to assist and improve the quality of life of patients affected by Kidney Stone Disease (KSD). Despite this, their scientific quality and adherence to guidelines are not yet addressed.

Material and methods: On 2 November 2022, we conducted an observational cross-sectional descriptive study of all MHAs on KSD. A search in the Apple App Store and Google Play Store was performed. We reviewed all mobile apps from Apple App Store and Google Play Store for KSD and evaluated their usage in screening, prevention, management, and adherence to EAU guidelines.

Results: In total 13 MHA were included in the final analysis. All MHAs, 4 (30.8%) from the Apple App Store and 9 (69.2%) from the Google Play Store are geared towards the patient. Engagement ranged from 1.73 to 4.06; Functionality ranged from 3.17 to 4.75; Aesthetics ranged from 1.9 to 4.12; Information ranged from 2.25 to 4.27, and Subjective quality ranged from 1.58 to 3.23. MHAs reported low and medium adherence to EAU guidelines.

Conclusions: MHAs provide a very useful assistance in several medical fields, including KSD. Despite MHAs development is constantly increasing, the scientific validation, content, and quality are not yet solved. Future research is necessary to improve the quality of the apps and promote new user designed, and high-quality apps.


Sohgaura A, Bigoniya P. A review on epidemiology and etiology of renal stone. Am. J. Drug Discov. Dev. 2017; 7: 54-62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajdd.2017.54.62

Curhan GC. Epidemiology of stone disease. Urol Clin North Am. 2007; 34:287-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2007.04.003

Khan SR, Pearle MS, Robertson WG, et al. Kidney stones. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016; 2:16008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.8

Frassetto L, Kohlstadt I. Treatment and prevention of kidney stones: an update. Am Fam Physician. 2011; 84:1234-42.

Spring B, Gotsis M, Paiva A, Spruijt-Metz D. Healthy apps: mobile devices for continuous monitoring and intervention. IEEE Pulse. 2013; 4:34-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MPUL.2013.2279620

Mirone V, Creta M, Capece M, et al. Telementoring for communi-cation between residents and faculty physicians: Results from a survey on attitudes and perceptions in an Academic Tertiary Urology Referral Department in Italy. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2021; 93:450-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2021.4.450

Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, et al. Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015; 3:e27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.3422

Stec MA, Arbour MW, Hines HF. Client-Centered Mobile Health Care Applications: Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale Instrument for Evidence-Based Evaluation. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019; 64:324-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12941

Napolitano L, Fusco GM, Cirillo L, et al. Erectile dysfunction and mobile phone applications: Quality, content and adherence to European Association guidelines on male sexual dysfunction. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022; 94:211-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2022.2.211

Davalbhakta S, Advani S, Kumar S, et al. A systematic review of the smartphone applications available for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) and their assessment using the mobile app rating scale (MARS). medRxiv [Preprint]. 2020 Jul 4:2020.07.02.20144964. Update in: J Med Syst. 2020; 44:164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.02.20144964

Napolitano L, Cirillo L, Fusco GM, et al. Premature ejaculation in the era of mobile health application: A current analysis and eval-uation of adherence to EAU guidelines. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022; 94:328-333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2022.3.328

Napolitano L, Cirillo L, Fusco GM, et al. Natural treatments for erectile dysfunction: A focus on mobile health applications. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022; 94:373-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2022.3.373

Fusco GM, Cirillo L, Abate M, et al. Male infertility, what Mobile Health Applications “know”: quality analysis and adherence to European Association of Urology Guidelines. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022; 94:470-475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2022.4.470

O'Connor SR, Kee F, Thompson DR, et al. A review of the qual-ity and content of mobile apps to support lifestyle modifications fol-lowing a transient ischaemic attack or 'minor' stroke. Digit Health. 2021; 7:20552076211065271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076211065271

Jupp JCY, Sultani H, Cooper CA, et al. Evaluation of mobile phone applications to support medication adherence and symptom management in oncology patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018; 65:e27278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.27278

López JM, Mainez JA, Mora Christian J, et al. Usefulness and acceptability of a Smart pH meter and mobile medical App as a mon-itoring tool in patients with urolithiasis: short-term prospective study. Arch Esp Urol. 2022; 75:60-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37554/en-j.arch.esp.urol-20211108-3552-36

Geraghty RM, Davis NF, Tzelves L, et al. Best Practice in Interventional Management of Urolithiasis: An Update from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel for Urolithiasis 2022. Eur Urol Focus. 2022:S2405-4569(22)00144-4.

Philip-McKenzie Y, Jamnadass E, Hameed BZ, et al. A content analysis of 'Water Apps' and prevention of urological diseases: Do apps really help? Cent European J Urol. 2020; 73:187-192.

Khambati A, Matulewicz RS, Perry KT, Nadler RB. Factors Associated with Compliance to Increased Fluid Intake and Urine Volume Following Dietary Counseling in First-Time Kidney Stone Patients. J Endourol. 2017; 31:605-610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0836

Streeper NM, Lehman K, Conroy DE. Acceptability of Mobile Health Technology for Promoting Fluid Consumption in Patients With Nephrolithiasis. Urology. 2018; 122:64-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.08.020

Banov P, Ceban E. The efficacy of metaphylaxis in treatment of recurrent urolithiasis. J Med Life. 2017; 10:188-193.

Becker B, Gadzhiev N, Popiolek M, et al. Smartphone-App für Patienten mit Nierensteinen [A mobile app for patients suffering from kidney stones]. Urologe A. 2018; 57:577-582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-018-0652-0

Shahmoradi L, Azizpour A, Bejani M, et al. Prevention and con-trol of urinary tract stones using a smartphone-based self-care appli-cation: design and evaluation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021; 21:299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01661-0

Cirillo, L., Manfredi, C., Barone, B., Morgera, V., Cacace, G., Mastrangelo, F., Di Bello, F., Abate, M., Arcaniolo, D., Spirito, L., Crocetto, F., La Rocca, R., Creta, M., Calace, F. P., Fusco, G. M., & Napolitano, L. (2023). Mobile health applications in kidney stone disease management: A reliable support for patients?. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 95(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2023.11076

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations