Comparison of the effect of interactive and non-interactive education on the self-efficacy of COVID-19 patients
https://doi.org/10.4081/hls.2023.11872
Accepted: 24 November 2023
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of interactive and non-interactive education on the self-efficacy of COVID-19 patients. This is a randomized clinical trial that was conducted on 80 COVID-19 patients in Zahedan in 2022. The samples were randomly assigned to intervention (interactive) and control (non-interactive) groups (n=40 people per group). The patients of each group received two initial education sessions in the hospital and at the time of discharge. Patients of the intervention group participated in 5 sessions of face-to-face interactive education along with practical education using a video projector by the researcher. The control group only received education ions by ward nurses during discharge and only one educational PDF file was given to them to study. The results showed that the mean and standard deviation of the self-efficacy score of the patients of the two interactive and non-interactive education groups did not differ significantly before the intervention (P = 0.024), but it was significantly higher in the interactive education group than the non-interactive education group (p<0.0001). That is, the mean and standard deviation of the self-efficacy score of patients in the interactive education group increased significantly from 49.8 ± 14.77 to 96.77 ± 18.29. The same score in the non-interactive education group increased from 57.85 ± 16.35 to 62.45 ± 14.52, which was not a significant increase. The results showed this intervention helps patients to make informed decisions about their goals, treatments, and self-care behaviors.
Mohammad AA, Firouzkouhi MR. Qualitative Research in COVID 19 Pandemic. Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences. 2021: 29 3448-52 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/ssu.v29i2.6083
Firouzkouhi M, Abdollahimohammad A, Alimohammadi N, et al. Lived experiences of critically ill COVID-19 patients about death and dying: a descriptive phenomenology. OMEGA- J Death Dying 2022:00302228211073269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228211073269
Liu X, Na R, Bi Z. Challenges to prevent and control the outbreak of COVID-19. Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi= Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi. 2020: 994
Firouzkouhi M, Abdollahimohammad A, Rezaie-Kheikhaie K, et al. Nurses’ caring experiences in COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review of qualitative research. Health Sci Rev 2022:100030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hsr.2022.100030
Li S, Wang Y, Xue J, et al. The impact of COVID-19 epidemic declaration on psychological consequences: a study on active Weibo users. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:2032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062032
Bao Y, Sun Y, Meng S, et al. 2019-nCoV epidemic: address mental health care to empower society. Lancet 2020;395:e37-e38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30309-3
Bo H-X, Li W, Yang Y, et al. Posttraumatic stress symptoms and attitude toward crisis mental health services among clinically stable patients with COVID-19 in China. Psychol Med 2021;51:1052-1053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720000999
8 Yao H, Chen J-H, Xu Y-F. Patients with mental health disorders in the COVID-19 epidemic. Lancet Psychiatry 2020;7:e21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30090-0
Gandoy-Crego M, Clemente M, Gómez-Cantorna C, et al. Self-efficacy and Health: The SEH Scale. Am J Health Behav 2016;40:389-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.40.3.11
Khadivzadeh T, Seighalani MAS, Mirzaii K, Mazloum SR. The Effect of Interactive Educational Workshops With or Without Standardized Patients on the Clinical Skills of Midwifery Students in Providing Sexual Health Counseling. Simul Healthc 2020;15:234-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000439
Habibinezhad Z, Parvaresh Masoud M, Vahedian M, Akbari M. The effect of interactive training on emergency nurses’ readiness and attitude through triage in fasa city hospital 1397. Iranian J Nurs Res 2021:28
Hesaraki M, Akbarizadeh M, Ahmadidarrehsima S, et al. Knowledge, attitude, practice and clinical recommendations of health care workers towards COVID-19: a systematic review. Rev Environ Health 2020;36:345-357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2020-0099
Shaygan M, Yazdani Z, Rambod M. The effect of interactive virtual psycho-educational interventions via social networks on self-efficacy and anxiety among patients infected with COVID-19 and living in home quarantine: A randomized control trial. Iranian J Nursing Midwif Res 2023:65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_451_21
Pour ER, Aliyari S, Farsi Z, Ghelich Y. Comparing the effects of interactive and noninteractive education using short message service on treatment adherence and blood pressure among patients with hypertension. Nursing Midwif Studies 2020:68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/nms.nms_82_19
Haramiova Z, Stasko M, Hulin M, et al. The effectiveness of daily SMS reminders in pharmaceutical care of older adults on improving patients’ adherence to antihypertensive medication (SPPA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2017;18:334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2063-8
Gharaati F, Aghamolaei T, Davoodi SH, et al. Effect of a mobile-phone mediated based education on self-care behaviors of patients with thalassemia major. J Caring Sci 2019;8:149-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2019.022
Amiri M, Mobareke KA, Oreyzi SHR. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Interactive Diabetes Management Education and Stress Inoculation Training on the Self-care of Type II Diabetic Patients. J Res Behav Sci 2018:549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52547/rbs.16.4.549
Shoob A-e, Abbasi G-O, Mirzaian B. Comparing the Efficiency of Task-based Interactive Language Teaching and Task-based Language Teaching on Language Learners’ Fear of Negative Evaluation in University Heterogeneous Classes. J English Language Pedagogy Practice 2019:1
Hemmat A, Hemmat J, Pirzeh R, Dadashi M. The Effectiveness of Group Therapy Based on Acceptance and Commitment to Reduce Obsessive-Compulsive Use of Substance, Anxiety and Depression of Addicts under Methadone Treatment. J Adv Medical Biomed Res 2018:109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30699/jambs.30.142.10
Soltanian A, Khatiban M, Karbasi F. The Effects of Teaching the Communication Skills to Patients Through Role-Playing Method on Nursing Students' Self-Efficacy. Sci J Hamadan Nurs Midwif Faculty 2019:2819.
Roh YS, Lee WS, Chung HS, Park YM. The effects of simulation-based resuscitation training on nurses' self-efficacy and satisfaction. Nurse Educ Today 2013;33:123-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.11.008
Zarshenas L, Keshavarz T, Momennasab M, Zarifsanaiey N. Interactive multimedia training in osteoporosis prevention of female high school students: An interventional study. Acta Medica Iranica 2017:514.
Merriel A, Ficquet J, Barnard K, et al. The effects of interactive training of healthcare providers on the management of life‐threatening emergencies in hospital. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;9:CD012177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012177.pub2
Copyright (c) 2023 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Citations
