Usefulness of antenatal care handbook: a cross-sectional study of mothers' perspectives

Queenita Anak Luta; Khadizah H. Abdul Mumin; Hanif Abdul Rahman; Sarena Haji Hashim

doi:10.4081/hls.2023.11813

Authors

Queenita Anak Luta Nursing and Midwifery Programme, PAP Rashidah Sa'adatul Bolkiah, Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei Darussalam.
Khadizah H. Abdul Mumin Nursing and Midwifery Programme, PAP Rashidah Sa'adatul Bolkiah, Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei Darussalam; School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Melbourne,, Australia. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3474-5089
Hanif Abdul Rahman Nursing and Midwifery Programme, PAP Rashidah Sa'adatul Bolkiah, Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei Darussalam.
Sarena Haji Hashim
sarena.hashim@ubd.edu.bn
Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam; School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0165-7835

In 2016, the Ministry of Health Brunei Darussalam introduced the Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Handbook, replacing the card-type record. Despite its implementation, the handbook's utility remains unexamined. This study aims to evaluate the community's usage of the MCH handbook and explore the connections between age, education, and handbook utilization. A cross-sectional study employed an online self-administered survey among pregnant women attending routine antenatal checkups at 32 weeks gestation between December 2020 and January 2021. The survey used the MCH Usefulness Questionnaire, and subgroup analysis was conducted. The study included 73 mothers. Most participants reported having sufficient time to read the handbook (95.9%), being familiar with its content (89.0%), and feeling satisfied with its usage (93.2%). Reasons for not using the handbook included "online availability of the same information" (20.5%), difficulty in understanding certain words (17.8%), preference for more visual content (12.3%), and inadequate encouragement from healthcare providers (12.3%). The majority of mothers perceive the handbook as useful. Nonetheless, further investigation is necessary to delve into their perceptions and ensure the handbook's sustained relevance and effectiveness over time.

Nakamura Y. The role of maternal and child health (MCH) handbook in the era of sustainable development goals (SDGs). J Glob Heal Sci 2019;1(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35500/jghs.2019.1.e24

Widianti N, Suryawan A, Irmawati M. Validity test of pre-screening developmental questionnaire (PDQ) and mother and child health (MCH) handbook for determining children’s readiness to enter elementary school. Bali Med J 2023;12:211–7.

Utami S, Susilaningrum R, Nursalam. The effect of health promotion based on the health promotion model with a peer group approach regarding the utilization of maternal and child health handbook. Indian J Public Heal Res Dev 2019;10:1987–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2019.03139.5

Kawakatsu Y, Sugishita T, Oruenjo K, et al. Effectiveness of and factors related to possession of a mother and child health handbook: an analysis using propensity score matching. Health Educ Res 2015;30:935–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyv048

WMA - The World Medical Association. WMA Statement on the Development and Promotion of a Maternal and Child Health Handbook. 2021.

Osaki K, Kosen S, Indriasih E, et al. Factors affecting the utilisation of maternal, newborn, and child health services in Indonesia: the role of the Maternal and Child Health Handbook. Public Health 2015;129:582–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2015.01.001

Balogun OO, Tomo CK, Mochida K, et al. Impact of the Maternal and Child Health handbook in Angola for improving continuum of care and other maternal and child health indicators: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials 2020;21:1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04664-w

Magwood O, Kpadé V, Thavorn K, et al. Effectiveness of home-based records on maternal, newborn and child health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2019;14:e0209278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209278

Mori R, Yonemoto N, Noma H, et al. The maternal and child health (MCH) handbook in Mongolia: a cluster-randomized, controlled trial. PLoS One 2015;10:e0119772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119772

Aiga H, Nguyen VD, Nguyen CD, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practices: assessing maternal and child health care handbook intervention in Vietnam. BMC Public Health 2015;16:1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2788-4

Sudaryanti L, Mardhika A, Qona’Ah A, et al. Antenatal care of pregnant women during pandemic: A phenomenology study. J Pak Med Assoc 2023;73:S71–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.Ind-S2-17

Gopalakrishnan S, Eashwar VMA, Muthulakshmi M. Health-seeking behaviour among antenatal and postnatal rural women in Kancheepuram District of Tamil Nadu: A cross-sectional Study. J Fam Med Prim Care 2019;8:1035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_323_18

Istifa MN, Efendi F, Wahyuni ED, et al. Analysis of antenatal care, intranatal care and postnatal care utilization: Findings from the 2017 Indonesian Demographic and Health Survey. PLoS One 2021;16:e0258340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258340

Triharini M, Sulistyono A, Adriani M, Devy SR. The Effect of Health Promotion Intervention on Anemia Prevention Behavior and Haemoglobin Level in Pregnant Women: Based on Health Promotion Model and Self-Determination Theory. J Ners 2019;14:92–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/jn.v14i1.15213

Debessai Y, Costanian C, Roy M, et al. Inadequate prenatal care use among Canadian mothers: findings from the Maternity Experiences Survey. J Perinatol Off J Calif Perinat Assoc 2016;36:420–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.218

Moniz MH, Fendrick AM, Kolenic GE, et al. Out-Of-Pocket Spending For Maternity Care Among Women With Employer-Based Insurance, 2008-15. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020;39:18–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00296

Sebayang SK, Efendi F, Astutik E. Women’s empowerment and the use of antenatal care services: analysis of demographic health surveys in five Southeast Asian countries. Women Heal 2019;59:1155–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2019.1593282

Yunitasari E, Putri DUW, Armini NKA, et al. Analysis of factors that affect the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: A systematic review. J Pak Med Assoc 2023;73:S162–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.Ind-S2-37

Yanagisawa S, Soyano A, Igarashi H, et al. Effect of a maternal and child health handbook on maternal knowledge and behaviour: a community-based controlled trial in rural Cambodia. Health Policy Plan 2015;30:1184–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czu133

Khasanah U, Efendi F, Has EMM, et al. Healthcare-seeking behavior for children aged 0–59 months: Evidence from 2002–2017 Indonesia Demographic and Health Surveys. PLoS One 2023;18:e0281543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281543

Habtu Y, Yohannes S, Laelago T. Health seeking behavior and its determinants for cervical cancer among women of childbearing age in Hossana Town, Hadiya zone, Southern Ethiopia: community based cross sectional study. BMC Cancer 2018;18:1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4203-2

Swire-Thompson B, Lazer D. Public health and online misinformation: challenges and recommendations. Annu Rev Public Health 2020;41:433–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094127

Van Riel N, Auwerx K, Debbaut P, et al. The effect of Dr Google on doctor–patient encounters in primary care: a quantitative, observational, cross-sectional study. BJGP Open 2017;1(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen17X100833

Mardiyanti I, Devy SR, Ernawati E. Analysis of Sociodemographic and Information Factors on Family Behaviour in Early Detection of High-Risk Pregnancy. J Ners 2019;14:144–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/jn.v14i2.16561

Ainiyah NH. The use of Maternal and Child Health (MCH) handbook improves healthy behavior of pregnant women. Maj Obstet Ginekol 2017;25:58–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/mog.V25I22017.59-62

Tang J, Abraham C, Stamp E, Greaves C. How can weight‐loss app designers’ best engage and support users? A qualitative investigation. Br J Health Psychol 2015;20:151–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12114

Lim S, Xue L, Yen CC, et al. A study on Singaporean women’s acceptance of using mobile phones to seek health information. Int J Med Inform 2011;80:e189–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.08.007

Mahmood A, Kedia S, Wyant DK, et al. Use of mobile health applications for health-promoting behavior among individuals with chronic medical conditions. Digit Heal 2019;5:2055207619882181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619882181

Bhuyan SS, Lu N, Chandak A, et al. Use of mobile health applications for health-seeking behavior among US adults. J Med Syst 2016;40:153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0492-7

Anak Luta, Q., Abdul Mumin, K. H., Abdul Rahman , H., & Haji Hashim, S. (2023). Usefulness of antenatal care handbook: a cross-sectional study of mothers’ perspectives. Healthcare in Low-Resource Settings, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/hls.2023.11813