Reviews

Unplanned extubation in adult patients: a narrative review of modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 24 May 2026
Published: 3 July 2026
129
Views
33
Downloads

Authors

Unplanned Extubations (UE) are adverse events of relevant clinical significance, with an incidence ranging from less than 1 per 100 ventilator-days in high-volume academic settings to 19.74% in low-resource referral hospitals. This narrative review, conducted according to SANRA criteria, analyzed 7 studies published between 2021 and 2026 with the aim of identifying clinical, care-related, and organizational factors associated with unplanned removal of airway management devices in adult patients. Three thematic macro-areas were identified: patient-related factors (agitation, physical discomfort, male sex, short intubation duration, use of physical restraints); technical and clinical factors related to the device and its management (endotracheal tube positioning, event timing in relation to shift changes and direct nursing procedures); and organizational and professional factors (nurse-to-patient ratio, staff experience, cognitive continuity during care transitions). The results confirm the multifactorial nature of the phenomenon and highlight two significant gaps in the existing literature: the systematic absence of nursing experience as an independent variable, despite nurses representing the professionals with the highest direct patient contact time; and the exclusive focus on intensive care settings, with a near-total lack of data on rehabilitation and sub-intensive wards, where the progressive increase in tracheostomized patients makes unplanned device removal potentially even more critical. Future research should adopt standardized definitions, prospective multicenter designs, and explicitly include the nursing experience variable, extending the scope to non-intensive care settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

1. Cosentino C, Fama M, Foà C, et al. Unplanned extubations in intensive care unit: evidences for risk factors. A literature review. Acta Bio-Medica Atenei Parm 2017;88:55–65.

2. de Groot RI, Dekkers OM, Herold IH, et al. Risk factors and outcomes after unplanned extubations on the ICU: a case-control study. Crit Care Lond Engl 2011;15:R19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9964

3. Kiekkas P, Aretha D, Panteli E, et al. Unplanned extubation in critically ill adults: clinical review. Nurs Crit Care 2013;18:123–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-5153.2012.00542.x

4. Peñuelas Ó, Frutos-Vivar F, Esteban A. Unplanned extubation in the ICU: a marker of quality assurance of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Lond Engl 2011;15:128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10049

5. Chao CM, Sung MI, Cheng KC, et al. Prognostic factors and outcomes of unplanned extubation. Sci Rep 2017;7:8636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08867-1

6. Dixit K, Ishisaka Y, Sinclair De Frías J, et al. Trends in tracheostomy: a comparative analysis from 2018 to 2023. Chest 2024;166:A5180–1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3081

7. Betbesé AJ, Pérez M, Bak E, Rialp G, Mancebo J. A prospective study of unplanned endotracheal extubation in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 1998;26:1180–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199807000-00016

8. Chiang AA, Lee KC, Lee JC, Wei CH. Effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement program aiming to reduce unplanned extubation: a prospective study. Intensive Care Med 1996;22:1269–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709348

9. Kapadia FN, Tekawade PC, Nath SS, et al. A prolonged observational study of tracheal tube displacements: Benchmarking an incidence <0.5-1% in a medical-surgical adult intensive care unit. Indian J Crit Care Med Peer-Rev Off Publ Indian Soc Crit Care Med 2014;18:273–7.

10. Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Res Integr Peer Rev 2019;4:5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8

11. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

12. Aladin M, Buckley L, Maloney M, et al. Unplanned extubation prevention in the neuroscience ICU at a High Reliability Organization. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas 2025;135:111124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111124

13. Guillemin J, Rieu B, Huet O, et al. Prospective multi-center evaluation of the incidence of unplanned extubation and its outcomes in French intensive care units. The Safe-ICU study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2024;43:101411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101411

14. Gupta K, Espinosa L, Penikilapate S, et al. Impact of performance improvement strategies on unplanned extubation in an inner-city intensive care unit. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2025;19:17534666251383662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17534666251383662

15. Ju TR, Wang E, Castaneda C, et al. Superficial placement of endotracheal tubes associated with unplanned extubation: A case-control study. J Crit Care 2022;67:39–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.09.010

16. Minda Z, Samuel H, Aweke S, et al. Magnitude and associated factors of unplanned extubation in intensive care unit: A multi-center prospective observational study. Ann Med Surg 2012 2022;79:103936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103936

17. Tanios M, Nguyen HM, Devlin JW, et al. Impact of adding an airway safety prompt to the A-F bundle on unplanned extubation in the intensive care unit. BMJ Open Qual 10 2025;14:196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003196

18. Zuo M, Chu H, Qian X. Protective restraint nursing interventions in ICU patients: assessing their influence on unplanned extubation and skin injury incidence. Altern Ther Health Med 2024;30:264–9.

19. Li P, Sun Z, Xu J. Unplanned extubation among critically ill adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2022;70:103219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103219

20. Herer B. Outcomes of tracheostomized subjects undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation in an intermediate-care facility. Respir Care 2018;63:282–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.05602

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

CRediT authorship contribution

Ruben Gorla conceived the research question, defined the study objectives, and was responsible for the original drafting of the manuscript, including the narrative synthesis and interpretation of findings. Valentina Sciara led the construction of the search strategy, coordinated the literature search across all three databases, and supervised the methodological application of SANRA criteria throughout the review process. Both authors independently performed title and abstract screening; disagreements were resolved through discussion and, where necessary, full-text reading. Full-text evaluation and data extraction were performed jointly. Both authors contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the final version.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

How to Cite



Unplanned extubation in adult patients: a narrative review of modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors. (2026). Emergency Care Journal. https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2026.15693