Reviews

Effectiveness of plasma versus crystalloids in pre-hospital hemorrhagic shock: systematic review and meta-analysis

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 20 October 2025
Accepted: 10 December 2025
Published: 13 January 2026
364
Views
53
Downloads

Authors

The impact of prehospital plasma transfusion on survival after major trauma remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD420251027516) following PRISMA 2020 standards. Randomized and comparative observational studies published through [March 8, 2025] were included; alerts/hand-searches to April 15, 2025. Primary outcomes were 24-hour and 28–30-day mortality. Pooled Odds Ratios (ORs) were estimated using random-effects models with restricted maximum likelihood and Hartung–Knapp adjustment. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 and ROBINS-I, and certainty of evidence appraised by GRADE. Three randomised trials (n=760) and two observational cohorts were included. Mortality at 28–30 days did not differ between pre-hospital plasma and crystalloids (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.49–1.72; I²=50.6%). Twenty-four-hour mortality was not meta-analysed due to heterogeneity. Secondary outcomes showed no clinically significant differences. Observational cohorts were not pooled due to endpoint misalignment and risk of bias. Certainty of evidence ranged from low to very low across outcomes, primarily due to imprecision and inconsistency. Current evidence shows no survival benefit of prehospital plasma over crystalloid resuscitation. The findings remain uncertain, and routine plasma use should be restricted to controlled research or highly structured trauma systems until adequately powered multicenter trials with standardized outcomes confirm benefit. In Emergency Medical Services (EMS) settings, crystalloids remain the pragmatic first-line fluid.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1. World Health Organization. Injuries and violence: key facts. Geneva: WHO; 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/injuries-and-violence
2. Kauvar DS, Wade CE. The epidemiology and modern management of traumatic hemorrhage. J Trauma 2005;59:S2–6.
3. Latif RK, Hasselé MF, Apostolakis S, et al. Traumatic hemorrhage and the chain of survival: economic and clinical impact. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2023;31:118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01088-8
4. Gauss T, Pasquier P, Montalvan P, et al. Association between prehospital time and in-hospital trauma mortality in a physician-staffed system. JAMA Surg 2019;154:1117–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3475
5. von Olnhausen O, Wladis A, Bäckström D. Prehospital fatal hemorrhage in Sweden: a nationwide population-based study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2024;32:96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01269-z
6. Mitra B, Cameron PA, Gruen RL. The lethal triad of hypothermia, acidosis and coagulopathy in trauma: a review. Injury 2012;43:556–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.10.015
7. Spahn DR, Bouillon B, Cerny V, et al. Management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fifth edition of the European guideline. Crit Care 2019;23:98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2347-3
8. Rossaint R, Bouillon B, Cerny V, et al. The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: sixth edition. Crit Care 2023;27:260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04327-7
9. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Advanced trauma life support (ATLS): student course manual. 10th ed. Chicago (IL): American College of Surgeons; 2018.
10. Pusateri AE, Moore EE, Moore HB, et al. Association of prehospital plasma transfusion with survival in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 2020;155:e201706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1131
11. AlJoaib NA, AlGhamdi FA, Ghafoor A, et al. Prehospital plasma administration for haemorrhagic shock: a systematic review. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2024;17:136–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_124_23
12. Hamed AA, Shuib SM, Elhusein AM, et al. Efficacy and safety of prehospital blood transfusion in traumatized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prehosp Disaster Med 2024;39:e38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X24000621
13. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al., editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2nd ed. Chichester (UK): Wiley-Blackwell; 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604
14. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
15. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies. BMJ 2017;358:j4008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008
16. Rethlefsen ML, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, et al. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches. Syst Rev 2021;10:39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z
17. McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, et al. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2016;75:40–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021
18. Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB. The injury severity score. J Trauma 1974;14:187–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-197403000-00001
19. Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS, et al. A revision of the trauma score. J Trauma 1989;29:623–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198905000-00017
20. Ringdal KG, Coats TJ, Lefering R, et al. The Utstein template for uniform reporting of data following major trauma. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2008;16:7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-16-7
21. Christoffel J, Maegele M. Guidelines in trauma-related bleeding and coagulopathy: an update. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2024;37:110–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001346
22. Vlaar APJ, Toy P, Fung M, et al. A consensus redefinition of transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI). Transfusion 2019;59:2465–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.15311
23. Wiersum-Osselton JC, Whitaker B, Gray A, et al. Revised international surveillance case definition of transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO). Lancet Haematol 2019;6:e350–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30080-8
24. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:395–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012
25. Savage SA, Zarzaur BL, Croce MA, Fabian TC. Redefining massive transfusion: the critical administration threshold (CAT). J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013;74:396–401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31827a3639
26. Moren A, Hampton D, Diggs B, et al. Recursive partitioning identifies >4 units of packed red blood cells per hour as an improved massive transfusion definition. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015;79:920–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000830
27. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan: a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016;5:210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
28. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or IQR. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014;14:135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
29. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019;366:l4898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898
30. Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies. BMJ 2016;355:i4919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919
31. Campbell M, McKenzie JE, Sowden A, et al. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline. BMJ 2020;368:l6890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6890
32. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:37–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
33. Gwet KL. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2008;61:29–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/000711006X126600
34. Moore HB, Moore EE, Chapman MP, et al. Plasma-first resuscitation to treat hemorrhagic shock during emergency ground transportation in an urban area (COMBAT). Lancet 2018;392:283–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31553-8
35. Sperry JL, Guyette FX, Brown JB, et al. Prehospital plasma during air medical transport in trauma patients at risk for hemorrhagic shock (PAMPer). N Engl J Med 2018;379:315–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1811315
36. Jost D, Lemoine S, Lemoine F, et al. Prehospital lyophilized plasma for trauma-induced coagulopathy (PREHO-PLYO). JAMA Netw Open 2022;5:e2223619.
37. Henriksen HH, Rahbar E, Baer LA, et al. Pre-hospital transfusion of plasma in hemorrhaging trauma patients independently improves hemostatic competence and acidosis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2016;24:145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0327-z
38. Shlaifer A, Siman-Tov M, Radomislensky I, et al. The impact of prehospital administration of freeze-dried plasma on casualty outcome. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2019;86:108–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000002094
39. Abuelazm M, Rezq H, Mahmoud A, et al. The efficacy and safety of pre-hospital plasma in patients at risk for hemorrhagic shock: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2024;50:2697–707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02461-7
40. Levy MJ, O’Connor JY, King DR, Lublink MJ. Bridging the gap: whole blood and plasma in prehospital trauma resuscitation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2025;98:e1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2025-001828

How to Cite



Effectiveness of plasma versus crystalloids in pre-hospital hemorrhagic shock: systematic review and meta-analysis. (2026). Emergency Care Journal. https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2026.14597