Case Reports

Persistent hypoxia in a pediatric patient following a house fire

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 12 May 2025
Accepted: 20 October 2025
Published: 4 December 2025
415
Views
97
Downloads

Authors

A 5-year-old female presented to the pediatric emergency department from a community emergency department for persistent hypoxia in the setting of inhalational exposure due to a house fire. The patient had refractory hypoxia despite routine interventions in the referring emergency department. After a thorough physical exam, and further lab work-up, it was determined that the child had complex congenital heart disease that was yet undiagnosed, and her hypoxia was unrelated to her inhalational exposure. This case demonstrates the risk of anchoring bias and premature closure in the emergency department. By maintaining a broad differential diagnosis, this patient received the appropriate care for her complex congenital heart condition. Providers should self-evaluate for early closure and anchoring bias to minimize morbidity and mortality risk to patients. Through an understanding of adult learning and thought-processing patterns, providers can assess their biases and maintain broad differential diagnoses when presented with information contrary to their first impression.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1. Szymanski KD, Tannan SC. Thermal burns. StatPearls [Internet]: StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
2. Kayton ML, Staab V, Stahl B, et al. Health Inequities in Pediatric Trauma. Children 2023;10:343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children10020343
3. Toma A, Voicu D, Popazu C, et al. Severity and Clinical Outcomes of Pediatric Burns—A Comprehensive Analysis of Influencing Factors. J Pers Med 2024;14:788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14080788
4. Reid A, Ha JF. Inhalational injury and the larynx: A review. Burns 2019;45:1266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2018.10.025
5. Walker PF, Buehner MF, Wood LA, et al. Diagnosis and management of inhalation injury: an updated review. Crit Care 2015;19:351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1077-4
6. Vida VL, Mack R, Barnoya J, et al. The association of renal tubular acidosis and cyanotic congenital heart disease. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surgery 2005;130:1466-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.06.040
7. Scarfone RJ, Nagler J. Cognitive errors in pediatric emergency medicine. Pediatric Emerg Care 2023;37:96–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000002342
8. Mamede S, Zandbergen A, De Carvalho-Filho MA, et al. Role of knowledge and reasoning processes as predictors of resident physicians’ susceptibility to anchoring bias in diagnostic reasoning: a randomised controlled experiment. BMJ Qual Saf 2024;33:563-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016621
9. Ly DP, Shekelle PG, Song Z. Evidence for anchoring bias during physician decision-making. JAMA Intern Med 2023;183:818-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.2366
10. Roland D, Snelson E. ‘So why didn’t you think this baby was ill?’ Decision-making in acute paediatrics. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2018;104:43-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-313199
11. Croskerry P, Singhal G, Mamede S. Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasing. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22:ii58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001712
12. Lakhlifi C, Rohaut B. Heuristics and biases in medical decision-making under uncertainty: The case of neuropronostication for consciousness disorders. Presse Méd 2023;52:104181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2023.104181
13. Daniel M, Carney M, Khandelwal S, et al. Cognitive debiasing strategies: a faculty development workshop for clinical teachers in emergency medicine. MedEdPORTAL 2017;13:10646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10646
14. Rutkowski RA, Scheer E, Carlson C, et al. A scoping review of work system elements that influence emergency department disposition decision-making. Human Factors in Healthcare 2023;4:100059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hfh.2023.100059
15. Oster ME, Pinto NM, Pramanik AK, et al. Newborn screening for critical congenital heart disease: a new algorithm and other updated recommendations: clinical report. Pediatrics 2025;155:e2024069667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-069667

How to Cite



Persistent hypoxia in a pediatric patient following a house fire. (2025). Emergency Care Journal. https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2025.13980