https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2025.13937
Sex disparities in older patients attending the european emergency departments: an EGERS sub-analysis
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 27 August 2025
This study explores the epidemiology and sex-specific characteristics of geriatric patients presenting to 36 Emergency Departments (EDs) across 9 European countries (EGERS study). This sub-analysis investigates potential associations between sex disparities and various characteristics, including demographics, personal traits, clinical findings, and main clinical outcomes, both in the general study population and across different age groups (old: 65–74 years, older: 75–84 years, and oldest: 85 years and above). Overall, females were more represented than males (51.5% vs. 48.5%), and this difference increased with increasing age groups. Females were more likely to use home support services, were visited for traumatic causes, and had a history of falls. In contrast, males had higher rates of hospitalization in ordinary wards (45.4% vs. 41.2%) and intensive care units (ICUs) (9.8% vs. 7.6%). In-hospital mortality was also higher in males (9.3%) compared to females (7.5%), and the difference increases with increasing age. In ED patients, the male-to-female ratio favoured women, particularly among those aged 85+ years. Males had more comorbidities, such as coronary artery disease, dyslipidaemia, active malignancy, prior stroke, chronic renal failure, history of coronary events, chronic liver disease, excessive smoking and alcohol abuse. Females had more traumatic events and falls. Hospitalisation and mortality rates were higher in males, especially in the older and oldest age groups.
A list of the EGERS research network study group’s names is available in the supplementary materials.
Downloads
1. van Oppen JD, Keillor L, Mitchell Á, et al. What older people want from emergency care: a systematic review. Emerg Med J 2019;36:754-761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2019-208589
2. Magidson PD, Carpenter CR. Trends in geriatric emergency medicine. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2021;39:243-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2020.12.004
3. Aminzadeh F, Dalziel WB. Older adults in the emergency department: a systematic review of patterns of use, adverse outcomes, and effectiveness of interventions. Ann Emerg Med 2002;39:238-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2002.121523
4. Gruneir A, Silver MJ, Rochon PA. Emergency department use by older adults: a literature review on trends, appropriateness, and consequences of unmet health care needs. Med Care Res Rev 2011;68:131-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558710379422
5. Dent E, Martin FC, Bergman H, et al. Management of frailty: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Lancet 2019;394:1376-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31785-4
6. Karamercan MA, Dündar DZ, Slagman A, et als. Epidemiology of geriatric patients presenting to emergency departments in Europe: EGERS study. Eur J Emerg Med 2023;30:117-24. Erratum in: Eur J Emerg Med 2023;30:224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000997
7. Subbe CP, Kruger M, Rutherford P, Gemmel L. Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions. QJM 2001;94:521-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/94.10.521
8. Smith GB, Prytherch DR, Meredith P, et al. The ability of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) to discriminate patients at risk of early cardiac arrest, unanticipated intensive care unit admission, and death. Resuscitation 2013;84:465-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.12.016
9. Candel BG, Dap S, Raven W, et al. Sex differences in clinical presentation and risk stratification in the Emergency Department: An observational multicenter cohort study. Eur J Intern Med 2022;95:74-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2021.09.001
10. Lee SB, Oh JH, Park JH, et al. Differences in youngest-old, middle-old, and oldest-old patients who visit the emergency department. Clin Exp Emerg Med 2018;5:249-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.17.261
11. Wanrooij VHM, Cobussen M, Stoffers J, et al. Sex differences in clinical presentation and mortality in emergency department patients with sepsis. Ann Med 2023;55:2244873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2244873
12. Kabell Nissen S, Rueegg M, Carpenter CR, et al. Prognosis for older people at presentation to emergency department based on frailty and aggregated vital signs. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023;71:1250-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.18170
13. van Dam CS, Labuschagne HA, van Keulen K, et al. Polypharmacy, comorbidity and frailty: a complex interplay in older patients at the emergency department. Eur Geriatr Med 2022;13:849-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-022-00664-y
14. Salvi F, Rossi L, Lattanzio F, Cherubini A. Is polypharmacy an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes after an emergency department visit? Intern Emerg Med 2017;12:213-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-016-1451-5
15. Banerjee A, Mbamalu D, Ebrahimi S, et al. The prevalence of polypharmacy in elderly attenders to an emergency department - a problem with a need for an effective solution. Int J Emerg Med 2011;4:22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1865-1380-4-22
16. Cella A, Veronese N, Custodero C, et al. Validation of Abbreviated Form of the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI): The BRIEF-MPI Project. Clin Interv Aging 2022;17:789-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S355801
17. Di Prazza A, Canino B, Barbagallo M, Veronese N. The importance of prognosis in geriatric patients attending the emergency department: a comparison between two common short geriatric assessment tools. Aging Clin Exp Res 2023;35:3041-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-023-02603-8
18. Lucke JA, Mooijaart SP, Heeren P, et al. Providing care for older adults in the Emergency Department: expert clinical recommendations from the European Task Force on Geriatric Emergency Medicine. Eur Geriatr Med 2022;13:309-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-021-00578-1
Supporting Agencies
European Society of Emergency MedicineHow to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
