https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2025.13316
Standard vs. mass training in basic life support and defibrillation: a prospective analysis among Italian high school students within a municipal project
Accepted: 20 January 2025
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Italian Law No. 116/2021 highlights the necessity of basic life support (BLS) education in schools, especially for secondary school students. This study assessed the efficacy of two basic life support and defibrillation (BLSD) training models — standard teaching method (SE) and mass teaching method (ME) — focusing on student satisfaction and skill retention. Between January 2023 and April 2024, high school students attended either SE sessions (24 students per session) or ME sessions (100 students per session). Both groups completed a 5-hour course following Italian Resuscitation Council Guidelines with an instructor-student ratio of 1:6. Skill retention was assessed immediately and after four months; satisfaction was measured via the Likert scale. Among 1307 students, 899 completed the follow-up. ME students showed superior skill in environmental safety and compression frequency, while SE students excelled in hand placement. Satisfaction levels were high in both groups, with no significant differences, indicating both SE and ME methods were well received.
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
